Analyzing the Argument: Is Algebraic Operations on Infinite Series Valid?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the validity of algebraic operations on infinite series, particularly focusing on divergent series and their properties. Participants explore the implications of applying standard algebraic rules to series that do not converge, as well as the nuances of conditionally convergent series.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant argues that certain manipulations of the series S = 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + ... are invalid due to ignoring sums based on congruence modulo 2.
  • Another participant suggests that algebraic operations on infinite series do not behave like those on finite numbers because the series diverges, indicating a limitation in applying standard rules.
  • A question is raised about the existence of defined operations for divergent series, leading to a mention of literature on the topic.
  • It is noted that even conditionally convergent series, such as the harmonic series, face issues with associativity and commutativity, referencing Riemann's Rearrangement Theorem.
  • A participant provides a link to the Riemann Series Theorem, which relates to the rearrangement of conditionally convergent series.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of algebraic operations on divergent series, with some agreeing on the limitations while others explore the implications of conditionally convergent series. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the application of algebraic rules to these series.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the convergence of series for the validity of algebraic operations and the unresolved nature of how to handle divergent series without specific summation techniques.

Gear300
Messages
1,209
Reaction score
9
I just need to make sure that I've got this analysis right:

The argument S = 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - ...
then S = (1 - 1) + (1 -1) + (1 -1) + ... = 0 is invalid because it ignores all sum Sn for n not congruent modulo 2 (not even).

The argument S = 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - ...
then S = 1 - (1 -1) - (1 - 1) - ... = 1 is invalid because it ignores all sum Sn for n congruent modulo 2 (even).

The argument S = 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - ...
then S = 1 - (1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + ...) = 1 - S,
S = 1 - S
S = 1/2 is invalid because S + S (from adding the terms) is the same as S. From this, it seems as though algebraic operations such as addition and multiplication by scalars do not seem to work the same way with infinite series as they do with numbers.

The argument S = 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 ...
Then 2S = 2 + 4 + 8 + 16 ...
2S = S - 1
S = -1 is invalid because (from the third argument) 2S - S is not necessarily S.

What struck me as odd was that even though infinite series, such as these, consist of algebraic operations on Real Numbers (integers in this case), algebraic operations do not seem to work on them in the same way...why is that so?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gear300 said:
algebraic operations do not seem to work on them in the same way...why is that so?

Because the series diverges. You can use those rules on series that converge absolutely, but not (without Caesaro, etc. summation) on divergent series.
 
I see...are there defined operations for diverging series?
 
Gear300 said:
I see...are there defined operations for diverging series?

There are whole BOOKS on the subject ... such as:

G. H. Hardy, Divergent Series, 1929
 
I see...thanks for the replies.
 
Even when the series is conditionally convergent, such as the harmonic series \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n}, there are still problems with associativity and commutativity of addition and distribution.

There is a theorem (which may be called Riemann's Rearrangement Theorem) that says for any conditionally convergent series there exists a permutation of the terms that will converge to any finite number desired or diverge to infinity or minus infinity.

The only series where the normal algebraic properties hold are those that are absolutely convergent.

--Elucidus
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K