Analyzing the kinematic x(t) equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter brusier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematic
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 4K views
brusier
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Solve the equation below for deltaX symbolically and simplify the answer as much as possible.

deltaY = (tan A)deltaX - g*deltaX^2/2V(initialx)^2

Homework Equations


quadratic equation.


The Attempt at a Solution



I can handle the algebra and simplification. My question comes as I analyze the equation as a kinematics problem. I assume the fnal term was gotten by the equation:

V(final)^2 = V(initial)^2 + 2ax. Therefore V(final) = 0 so there is a deceleration. But g is divided by this accel so I guess g is dependent on this acceleration??

I also found, that given the velocity v time graph, V(initial) = tan A.

Why wasn't this value used in the g*deltaX^2/2 V(initialx)^2 term?

Finally, because I don't see any t in the equation, I assume it can be used in terms of deltaX as well?? Or was the professor just testing our understanding of the quadratic equ?

Does this quation describe any familiar motion?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
deltaY = (tan A)deltaX - g*deltaX^2/2V(initialx)^2
Dimensionally this equation is not correct. One t is missing.
I also found, that given the velocity v time graph, V(initial) = tan A.
V initial cannot be tanA