'And' means 'Multiply' and 'Or' means 'Add'?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ajay.05
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Means
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the principles of probability and combinatorics, specifically how to interpret 'and' as multiplication and 'or' as addition in probability calculations. Participants clarify that these operations apply under specific conditions: multiplication for independent events and addition for mutually exclusive events. The conversation also highlights the importance of distinguishing between probability and combinatorial counting, using examples such as drawing cards from a deck and rolling dice to illustrate these concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic probability concepts
  • Familiarity with combinatorial counting techniques
  • Knowledge of independent and mutually exclusive events
  • Ability to calculate combinations, such as using the binomial coefficient (nCr)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of independent and dependent events in probability
  • Learn about mutually exclusive events and their implications in probability calculations
  • Explore combinatorial techniques, specifically the use of binomial coefficients (nCr)
  • Investigate real-world applications of probability and combinatorics in games and decision-making
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, educators teaching probability and combinatorics, and anyone interested in understanding the foundational principles of probability theory.

ajay.05
Messages
46
Reaction score
3
Mentor note: Moved from a non-HW forum section, so missing the HW template
When I was attending probability class, my math teacher said me that in the problems involving Case 1 'and' Case 2, I have to multiply probability of Case 1 and Case 2, while in the case of Case 1 'or' Case 2, I have to add probability of Case 1 and Case 2. I didn't get any valid reason from my Math teacher for this statement. Recently, when I was Studying Combinatorics, I cam across the same thing. I can give an Example from that...
"What is the number of ways of choosing 4 cards from a pack of playing cards, such that
1)Four Cards of the same suit
2)Four Cards belonging to different suits"

For the first question, it means 13C4 or 13C4 or 13C4 or 13C4, that is 13C4+13C4+13C4+13C4
For the second question, it means 13C1 and 13C1 and 13C1 and 13C1, that is 13C1*13C1*13C1*13C1
Can anybody please explain this to me? What do actually these and/or things mean?
Thanks in Advance:)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you look at the problem you have to figure out what it means to pick four cards from the deck in order to fulfill the requirement of either case. It is impossible to draw both situations at once so the two should be separate draws. Unless you keep on drawing after the first pick of four.
Your example does not tell me what to do.
If I would guess you mean that for case 1) you end up with a combination problem that doesn't involve random drawing just calculating the number of sequences that fit case 1) which is 52*12*11*10 combinations. No probability involved, just a number of sequences that are not unique. If you need them to be unique you need to figure out how many combination ABCD you need to eliminate from the combinations you already have. And remember you have four suits.
Your second case is very similar to the first but involves 52*13*13*13 combinations again these are not unique in a sense that a hand abcd is the same as abdc where a,b,c,d are cards in the deck.
So how does this relate to adding or multiplying is how you split up the problem. If you calculate combinations that can happen separate from each draw and have no overlap you can add all those combination together. If do not split up the problem you usually end up with multiplying each situation to get all the combinations. (and dividing out those that do not match yours)
I think you are making it hard because you mix up the terms probability and combinations. In order to calculate the probability of a person drawing four cards out of a random 52 card deck involves the number of combinations which are correct dividing them by the number that you actually can be drawn namely 52*51*50*49 if you are only interested in the first four draws and then resetting the deck.
I hope this helps.
 
Michael27 said:
If you look at the problem you have to figure out what it means to pick four cards from the deck in order to fulfill the requirement of either case. It is impossible to draw both situations at once so the two should be separate draws. Unless you keep on drawing after the first pick of four.
Your example does not tell me what to do.
If I would guess you mean that for case 1) you end up with a combination problem that doesn't involve random drawing just calculating the number of sequences that fit case 1) which is 52*12*11*10 combinations. No probability involved, just a number of sequences that are not unique. If you need them to be unique you need to figure out how many combination ABCD you need to eliminate from the combinations you already have. And remember you have four suits.
Your second case is very similar to the first but involves 52*13*13*13 combinations again these are not unique in a sense that a hand abcd is the same as abdc where a,b,c,d are cards in the deck.
So how does this relate to adding or multiplying is how you split up the problem. If you calculate combinations that can happen separate from each draw and have no overlap you can add all those combination together. If do not split up the problem you usually end up with multiplying each situation to get all the combinations. (and dividing out those that do not match yours)
I think you are making it hard because you mix up the terms probability and combinations. In order to calculate the probability of a person drawing four cards out of a random 52 card deck involves the number of combinations which are correct dividing them by the number that you actually can be drawn namely 52*51*50*49 if you are only interested in the first four draws and then resetting the deck.
I hope this helps.

Yes! I do know that this involves only combinatorics...But I wondered, whether this principle is followed in combinatorics too?
 
In a sense it does.
Let {a,b,c,d} be an item in the result set S where a,b,c and d are cards the actions on those combinations can be seen as items in a set. When making an intersection of all the subsets you'll end up with satisfying your S1 and S2 and S3 and S4 question which is not exactly multiplication. When you do an Or operation you do a join of all your result sets which can be seen as an addition.
The Or and And should be seen as operations on your (sub)result set(s) and not as multiplications or additions.
Hope this helps a bit more.
 
ajay.05 said:
When I was attending probability class, my math teacher said me that in the problems involving Case 1 'and' Case 2, I have to multiply probability of Case 1 and Case 2, while in the case of Case 1 'or' Case 2, I have to add probability of Case 1 and Case 2.
It is important to understand that neither of those statements are true in general. Each only applies under specific (and different) conditions.

You can multiply probabilities to get the 'joint' probability (i.e. the probability that both events happen) only if the events are independent. That is, if knowing that one event occurs does not alter the probability that the other occurs.
For a simple example, consider tossing a coin twice. What is the probability of getting two heads? Since the outcome of the second toss is independent of the outcome of the first toss, the probability of getting a head on the first AND a head on the second is 1/2 * 1/2 = 1/4.
For the combinatorics equivalent, count the number of possible outcomes (HH, HT, TH, TT). Only one of the four is HH.
Now consider two events that are not independent. Throw a die once. The probability that the result is an even number is 1/2. The probability that it is greater than 3 is 1/2. But the probability that it is even AND greater than 3 is 1/3, not 1/4. (4 and 6 are each even and greater than 3.)

To be able to add probabilities to get the probability that either one or the other event happens, you need to know that the events are mutually exclusive, i.e. that they cannot both happen. (So, in particular, they are definitely not independent.)
The probability of either a 4 or a 6 from one roll of a die is 1/6 + 1/6 = 1/3, because they cannot both happen. But if you ask for the probability of either a 4 on the the first roll or a 6 on the second roll it is different, because they could both happen. Can you work out what this probability is?

Edited as per Insightful's insight in post 6.
 
Last edited:
This doesn't seem right.
haruspex said:
The probability of either a 4 or a 6 from one roll of a die is 1/3 + 1/3 = 2/3
 
insightful said:
This doesn't seem right.
Good catch. I meant of, of course, 1/6+1/6=1/3.
 
haruspex said:
It is important to understand that neither of those statements are true in general. Each only applies under specific (and different) conditions.

You can multiply probabilities to get the 'joint' probability (i.e. the probability that both events happen) only if the events are independent. That is, if knowing that one event occurs does not alter the probability that the other occurs.
For a simple example, consider tossing a coin twice. What is the probability of getting two heads? Since the outcome of the second toss is independent of the outcome of the first toss, the probability of getting a head on the first AND a head on the second is 1/2 * 1/2 = 1/4.
For the combinatorics equivalent, count the number of possible outcomes (HH, HT, TH, TT). Only one of the four is HH.
Now consider two events that are not independent. Throw a die once. The probability that the result is an even number is 1/2. The probability that it is greater than 3 is 1/2. But the probability that it is even AND greater than 3 is 1/3, not 1/4. (4 and 6 are each even and greater than 3.)

To be able to add probabilities to get the probability that either one or the other event happens, you need to know that the events are mutually exclusive, i.e. that they cannot both happen. (So, in particular, they are definitely not independent.)
The probability of either a 4 or a 6 from one roll of a die is 1/3 + 1/3 = 2/3, because they cannot both happen. But if you ask for the probability of either a 4 on the the first roll or a 6 on the second roll it is different, because they could both happen. Can you work out what this probability is?

Thank You...
 

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K