Blackberg
- 29
- 20
Climate models!
https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2021/press-release/
https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2021/press-release/
The discussion revolves around the 2021 Nobel Prize in Physics, particularly focusing on the contributions related to climate models and the broader implications of these awards. Participants explore the significance of the awarded work, its historical context, and the perception of climate science within the physics community.
Participants express a range of views on the significance and novelty of the awarded work, with some questioning its originality while others emphasize its importance in the context of climate science. No consensus is reached regarding the implications of the prize or the nature of the contributions recognized.
Some discussions reflect a perceived lack of objectivity in the treatment of climate science within the physics community, which may influence participants' perspectives on the award.
It gets hotter and hotter in both metaphorical and literal sense.DennisN said:It's a hot topic, which is getting even hotter as the years go by.
Please check your PMs. Thanks.Blackberg said:Many years ago, I had to leave this forum because of that problem (lack of objectivity on the issue).
Manabe, of Princeton University, developed a one-dimensional climate model to investigate the balance of incoming radiation from the Sun, IR from Earth, convection in the atmosphere, and the latent heat of water vapor. His 1967 framework verified that carbon dioxide was the primary source of rising global temperatures.
My emphasis..
Syukuro Manabe and Klaus Hasselmann “for the physical modelling of Earth’s climate, quantifying variability and reliably predicting global warming”
Giorgio Parisi “for the discovery of the interplay of disorder and fluctuations in physical systems from atomic to planetary scales