MHB Angle change rate is a function of the instantaneous angle

zshaban
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Dear All,

I have an integration probelm and I hope to find a solution for.

I assume that an objects moves vertically in the +ive direction of the $y$ axis, from $x=a$, with constant speed $v$. I monitor the rate of change of the angle $\theta\left({t}\right)$. I have derived this rate to be:

$\frac{d\theta\left({t}\right)}{dt}=\frac{v}{a} \cos^2\left({\theta\left({t}\right)}\right)$.

I would like to solve this equation to get $\theta\left({t}\right)$. Does this make sense? Do you have any idea of how to do it?

Many thanks
Zohair
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
zshaban said:
Dear All,

I have an integration probelm and I hope to find a solution for.

I assume that an objects moves vertically in the +ive direction of the $y$ axis, from $x=a$, with constant speed $v$. I monitor the rate of change of the angle $\theta\left({t}\right)$. I have derived this rate to be:

$\frac{d\theta\left({t}\right)}{dt}=\frac{v}{a} \cos^2\left({\theta\left({t}\right)}\right)$.

I would like to solve this equation to get $\theta\left({t}\right)$. Does this make sense? Do you have any idea of how to do it?

Many thanks
Zohair

Wellcome on MHB zshaban!...

You can solve the ODE...

$\displaystyle \frac{d \theta}{d t} = \frac{v}{a}\ \cos^{2} \theta\ (1)$

... separating the variables as follows...

$\displaystyle \frac{d \theta}{\cos^{2} \theta} = \frac{v}{a}\ d t \implies \tan \theta = \frac{v}{a} (t + c) \implies \theta = \tan^{-1} (\frac{v\ t}{a} + c)\ (2)$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
chisigma said:
Wellcome on MHB zshaban!...

You can solve the ODE...

$\displaystyle \frac{d \theta}{d t} = \frac{v}{a}\ \cos^{2} \theta\ (1)$

... separating the variables as follows...

$\displaystyle \frac{d \theta}{\cos^{2} \theta} = \frac{v}{a}\ d t \implies \tan \theta = \frac{v}{a} (t + c) \implies \theta = \tan^{-1} (\frac{v\ t}{a} + c)\ (2)$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
Thank you, chisigma! That was really helpful.
 
I solve it this way:
\[vt = r\sin\theta,\,\,\,\,a=r\cos\theta\]
\[\tan\theta=\frac{vt}{a}\]
\[\theta=\tan^{-1}\frac{vt}{a}=\theta(t)\]
The domain of $\theta(t)=\pm\infty,$ the range is $\pm\frac{\pi}{2}$.

I don't understand the reason for treating this as an integration/differential equation problem.
 
Last edited:
DavidCampen said:
I solve it this way:
\[vt = r\sin\theta,\,\,\,\,a=r\cos\theta\]
\[\tan\theta=\frac{vt}{a}\]
\[\theta=\tan^{-1}\frac{vt}{a}=\theta(t)\]
The domain of $\theta(t)=\pm\infty,$ the range is $\pm\frac{\pi}{2}$.

I don't understand the reason for treating this as an integration/differential equation problem.

Thanks David. The intention was to consider a motion that makes an angle $\alpha$ with the $x-axis$, which is more complicated than the case shown above. I just wanted to find the tool to solve similar but more general cases, so I posted a simplified case.

Thanks again for your post.

Cheers,
Zohair
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top