Angle that makes kinetic and potential energy of simple pendulum equal

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between kinetic and potential energy in a simple pendulum, exploring methods to derive equations for speed and angle. Initial attempts involved conservation of energy to relate speed and angle, leading to a derived equation for speed, but the author struggled with the concept of maximum speed. A later realization connected potential energy to kinetic energy, simplifying the problem to a straightforward equation. The conversation highlights that both energy types depend on chosen reference points, and the derived equations ultimately yield consistent results despite initial confusion. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying energy conservation principles in pendulum motion analysis.
DrBanana
Messages
54
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
The max speed and the length of the string of a pendulum is given. At what angle (with regard to the vertical y axis) is the kinetic energy and potential energy the same? Assume the maximum angle displacement is small, so that the pendulum udergoes simple harmonic motion.
Relevant Equations
##E_{total}=0.5mv_{max}^2##
pendulumquestion.png


On the first attempt I used conservation of energy to get it down to a single equation involving theta and v (the speed when the angle is theta). But I had no idea how to find v.

Now since the maximum speed is given, it is possible to find the maximum angular displacement, ##\alpha##. Then, using conservation of energy, it is possible to show that ##v^2=2gL(cos\theta - cos\alpha)##. Then came my hail mary attempt, so to speak.
I don;t know if this is legal for a single particle, but I wrote ##\frac{1}{2}I \omega^2 = \int_{0}^{\beta}\tau d \beta##, where ##\tau=-Lmgsin\theta## and after solving the integral I use ##\beta=\alpha=\theta##. Of course, ##I=mL^2##. Using the fact that tangential speed=L*angular speed, it is possible to get another equation for v using this integral. Then equating the two v's: ##cos\theta-cos\alpha=1-cos(\alpha-\theta)##.
An observation is, I didn't actually use the fact that this is simple harmonic motion.
Is this way ok?

Now, I found a solution elsewhere. Though I do not understand it, it eerily yields a similar result:
##v_{max}^2=2gx##, x is the distance such that ##OBcos\theta+x=OA## (look at the figure). How it's assumed that the particle undergoes constant acceleration, I'm not sure. Using this equation, theta is calculated. At first this was the wrong approach, but the answer is the same as the one I get. Of course there is a possibility both methods are wrong.

Edit: It just occurred to me neither approach makes use of the fact that the two energies are equal. So how'd I still get an angle?

I can't believe I didn't get this before, but it should be as simple as this:
##2PE=E_{total}##
##2mgL(1-cos\theta)=mgL(1-cos\alpha)##
##\theta=9.166^{\circle}##

Still I would like to know what happened in my first attempt.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The snarky answer is: "Every angle that the pendulum achieves".

Potential energy depends on an arbitrarily chosen reference. Choose the right reference and potential energy is equal to kinetic energy.

For that matter, kinetic energy also depends on an arbitrarily chosen reference frame. Choose the right reference frame and kinetic energy can take on any arbitrarily chosen [non-negative] value.
 
Last edited:
DrBanana said:
Now, I found a solution elsewhere. Though I do not understand it, it eerily yields a similar result:
##v_{max}^2=2gx##, x is the distance such that ##OBcos\theta+x=OA## (look at the figure). How it's assumed that the particle undergoes constant acceleration, I'm not sure. Using this equation, theta is calculated. At first this was the wrong approach, but the answer is the same as the one I get. Of course there is a possibility both methods are wrong.
This is not a solution to the same problem. Distance ##x## is the vertical distance from the lowest point of the motion when the pendulum is at angle ##\theta## and at rest. Note that ##v_{max}^2=2gx## does not necessarily imply constant acceleration. It is a mechanical energy conservation equation because only gravity does work on the mass, so it's as if the mass were in free fall over height ##x##. If you write ##KE+PE## at height of release (##KE=0##) and at the lowest point (##PE=0##), $$0+mgx=\frac{1}{2}mv_{max}^2\implies v_{max}^2=2gx.$$The equation that you found relates the maximum speed to the angle of release from rest.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top