Angular Momentum: Calculating Change in Moment of Inertia

  • Thread starter Thread starter jrd007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angular
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a rotating platform and a person whose moment of inertia changes as they raise their arms. The discussion centers on the principles of angular momentum and the relationship between moment of inertia and rotational speed.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the conservation of angular momentum and its implications for changes in moment of inertia. Questions arise regarding the calculation of moment of inertia and the factor by which it changes.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the conservation of angular momentum, while others express confusion about the calculations involved. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the factor of change in moment of inertia, with some suggesting different values.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need for clarity on the initial and final angular velocities, as well as the assumptions related to the conservation of angular momentum. There is mention of potential errors in previously provided answers.

jrd007
Messages
159
Reaction score
0
Problem: A person stands, hands at his side, on a platform that is rotating at a rate of 1.30 rev/s. If he raises his arms to a horizontial position the speed of rotation decreases to 0.80 rev/s. (a) Why? (b)By what factor has the moment of inertia changed? Answer: (b) 1.6

Okay, so I know part a which is because his rotational inertia increases.

Someone please help explain where 1.6 is even coming from... I have yet to get a soild answer. :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]\vec{L} = I \vec{\omega}[/tex]
L, angular momentum, is conserved. Can you take it from here?
 
Last edited:
But how do I find I ? I know w is 1.30 - 0.80...
 
You don't.
You have Ii and If = kIi (where k is a factor by which Ii must be multiplied to get If)

I's should cancel out.
 
You do realize what conservation of linear momentum imples...

[tex]\vec{L}_{initial} = \vec{L}_{final}[/tex]
 
I am going to have to ask my instructor. I have no idea where the 1.6 is coming from. sorry.
 
Like I mentioned the previous time you brought this question up, the factor I get is 1.4. I think there is an error in the answer you were given.

EDIT: After looking at sig figs, I ended up with the factor of 1.6.

Since you're not grasping the conservation idea, how about this:

[tex]{L}_1 = I_1 {\omega_1}[/tex] and [tex]{L}_2 = I_2 {\omega_2}[/tex]

Now Since [tex]{L}_1 = {L}_2[/tex] then you can set the rest equal [tex]I_1 \omega_1 = I_2 \omega_2[/tex]

To get the ratio you are looking for solve that for [tex]\frac{I_2}{I_1}[/tex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K