Angular Momentum Conservation | Velocity at perigee

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of velocity at perigee using angular momentum conservation principles. The initial velocity at apogee is given as 3 km/s, and the textbook answer for velocity at perigee is 10.2 km/s. The user proposes using the formula for angular momentum, L = mvr, to simplify calculations and questions the validity of the equation 3 rad/s = 600 km/s. After further investigation, discrepancies in the textbook answers are noted, with one user suggesting a velocity of 18.3 km/s based on their calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum conservation principles
  • Familiarity with the concepts of apogee and perigee
  • Knowledge of basic physics equations, specifically L = mvr
  • Ability to interpret and analyze physics textbook problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of angular momentum equations in orbital mechanics
  • Learn about the effects of altitude on orbital velocity calculations
  • Explore discrepancies in textbook physics problems and solutions
  • Investigate the impact of updated editions on problem statements and answers
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching orbital mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding angular momentum in celestial mechanics.

I_Try_Math
Messages
119
Reaction score
25
Homework Statement
A Molniya orbit is a highly eccentric orbit of a communication satellite so as to provide continuous communications coverage. The orbit is positioned so that these countries have the satellite in view for extended periods in time (see below). If a satellite in such an orbit has an apogee at 40,000.0 km as measured from the center of Earth and a velocity of 3.0 km/s, what would be its velocity at perigee measured at 200.0 km altitude?
Relevant Equations
##L_i = L_f##
10-31.png


I'm trying to understand if I'm making a mistake because the answer in the textbook is ##10.2~km/s##.

Here's my attempt at a solution:

The subscript A is intended to mean apogee and P is for perigee.

##v_A = 3~km/s##

##w_A = \frac{v_A}{r_A} = 7.5 \times 10^{-5}~rad/s##

##L_i=L_f##

##I_Aw_A = I_Pw_P##

##mr_A^2w_A = mr_P^2w_P##

##w_P = \frac{r_A^2w_A}{r_P^2}##

## = \frac{(40000)^2(7.5 \times 10^{-5})}{200^2}##

##=3~rad/s = 600~km/s##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, I would skip finding ##\omega## and I would use ##L=mvr## for angular momentum because it's more direct and leaves little room for calculational error.

Second, you are given an altitude of 200 km. That's the distance from what to what?

Third, ##3~rad/s = 600~km/s## is not an equation that makes sense.

Fourth, I disagree with the book's answer that you gave. Please make sure you copied it correctly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and I_Try_Math
kuruman said:
First, I would skip finding ##\omega## and I would use ##L=mvr## for angular momentum because it's more direct and leaves little room for calculational error.

Second, you are given an altitude of 200 km. That's the distance from what to what?

Third, ##3~rad/s = 600~km/s## is not an equation that makes sense.
Okay that seems like a better approach. About the altitude, I suppose I should add the radius of earth to it for the use in the calculation.
 
I_Try_Math said:
Okay that seems like a better approach. About the altitude, I suppose I should add the radius of earth to it for the use in the calculation.
I suppose so.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
I_Try_Math said:
After double checking, the answer I'm seeing in the book is 10.2 km/s. This is problem #57.

https://openstax.org/books/university-physics-volume-1/pages/chapter-11
Check the answer in the link that you provided.

Edit: Wow, that's interesting. When I clicked on your link a few minutes ago, I think I saw the answer as 18.3 km/s. Now it's showing 10.2 km/s. I guess I need to get my eyes checked! Anyway, your answer of 18.3 km/s looks good.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: I_Try_Math
Here's what the link now gives for the problem statement:

1730404415506.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and I_Try_Math
TSny said:
Here's what the link now gives for the problem statement:

View attachment 352934
Ok thank you for pointing that out. They must have an updated version of the text online now.
 
I_Try_Math said:
Ok thank you for pointing that out. They must have an updated version of the text online now.
Yes.
The pdf version that you can download from OpenStax shows the problem as

1730405019509.png


Answer:
1730405375531.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: I_Try_Math

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
982
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
16K