Angular momentum of a particles in the form of ##L = mr^2\omega##

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the angular momentum formula for a planet orbiting the sun, specifically showing that ##L = mr^2\omega##. Participants clarify that the angle ##\phi## has different meanings in various contexts, leading to confusion in calculations. The angle in the equation ##L = mvr \sin \phi## represents the angle between the momentum vector and the position vector, while in the context of angular velocity, it refers to the angle in polar coordinates. It is emphasized that for circular motion, this angle is consistently 90 degrees, simplifying the relationship to ##L = mvr##. The conversation concludes with a suggestion to use a different variable, ##\psi##, to avoid further confusion.
Redwaves
Messages
134
Reaction score
7
Homework Statement
Consider a planet orbiting the fixed sun. Take the plane of the planet's orbit to be the xy plane, with the sun at the origin and label the planet's position by polar coordinates (##r,\phi##). Show that the planet's angular momentum has magnitude ##L = mr^2\omega##, where ##\dot\phi## = ##\omega##
Relevant Equations
##\vec{L} = \vec{P} \times \vec{r}##
##\vec{L} = \vec{P} \times\vec{r}##

##L = mvr sin \phi##, where P = mv

Since ##\vec{r}## and ##\vec{v}## are always perpendicular, ##\phi## = 90.

Then, ##L = mvr##

At this point, I don't see how to get ##L = mvr = mr^2\omega##, using ##\omega = \dot{\phi}##

I know that ##\omega = \frac{v}{r}##. However, the way the question if written, I'm wondering if there's another by way using the angle ##\phi##.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Redwaves said:
Homework Statement:: Consider a planet orbiting the fixed sun. Take the plane of the planet's orbit to be the xy plane, with the sun at the origin and label the planet's position by polar coordinates (##r,\phi##). Show that the planet's angular momentum has magnitude ##L = mr^2\omega##, where ##\dot\phi## = ##\omega##
Relevant Equations:: ##\vec{L} = \vec{P} \times \vec{r}##

##\vec{L} = \vec{P} \times\vec{r}##

##L = mvr sin \phi##, where P = mv

Since ##\vec{r}## and ##\vec{v}## are always perpendicular, ##\phi## = 90.

Then, ##L = mvr##

At this point, I don't see how to get ##L = mvr = mr^2\omega##, using ##\omega = \dot{\phi}##

I know that ##\omega = \frac{v}{r}##. However, the way the question if written, I'm wondering if there's another by way using the angle ##\phi##.
You are confusing two uses of the variable name ##\phi##.
In "where ##\dot\phi## = ##\omega##", ##\phi## is the angle in the XY plane as a polar coordinate.
In ##L = mvr sin \phi##, it is the angle between the vector ##\vec{P}## and the vector ##\vec r##.
 
haruspex said:
You are confusing two uses of the variable name ##\phi##.
In "where ##\dot\phi## = ##\omega##", ##\phi## is the angle in the XY plane as a polar coordinate.
In ##L = mvr sin \phi##, it is the angle between the vector ##\vec{P}## and the vector ##\vec r##.
Isn't ##\dot{\phi} = \frac{d\phi}{dt}##, which is ##\frac{\Delta\phi}{\Delta t}## where t -> 0

Thus, we are using ##\phi## the angle.
 
Redwaves said:
Isn't ##\dot{\phi} = \frac{d\phi}{dt}##, which is ##\frac{\Delta\phi}{\Delta t}## where t -> 0
Yes, but the ##{\phi} ## in ##\omega=\dot\phi## is the angle around the sun in the XY plane. I.e. if we write the coordinates in polar, the position of the planet at time t is ##\vec {r(t)}=(r(t),\phi(t))##. Clearly this angle is not always 90°.

In the equation ##L = mvr sin \phi##, ##{\phi} ## has a completely different meaning. It is the angle between the vector ##\vec v= \dot {\vec r }(t)## and the vector ##\vec r##. For circular motion, this angle is always 90°.

To avoid confusion, write ##L = mvr \sin (\psi)## instead.
 
Thread 'Earthed plates confusion'
So, we know that since the 3rd plate is grounded that means the potential from the right side of the third plate to infinity should be 0, i.e no work should be required to bring a test charge from infinity to the right side of plate 3. Similarly the left side of plate 3's potential should also be 0, i.e no work is done when moving a test charge from infinity to the left side of plate 3. This should mean the fields in these regions should either cancel out or be 0. My teacher told me that...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
683
Replies
335
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K