Angular momentum of a particles in the form of ##L = mr^2\omega##

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the angular momentum formula for a planet orbiting the sun, specifically showing that ##L = mr^2\omega##. Participants clarify that the angle ##\phi## has different meanings in various contexts, leading to confusion in calculations. The angle in the equation ##L = mvr \sin \phi## represents the angle between the momentum vector and the position vector, while in the context of angular velocity, it refers to the angle in polar coordinates. It is emphasized that for circular motion, this angle is consistently 90 degrees, simplifying the relationship to ##L = mvr##. The conversation concludes with a suggestion to use a different variable, ##\psi##, to avoid further confusion.
Redwaves
Messages
134
Reaction score
7
Homework Statement
Consider a planet orbiting the fixed sun. Take the plane of the planet's orbit to be the xy plane, with the sun at the origin and label the planet's position by polar coordinates (##r,\phi##). Show that the planet's angular momentum has magnitude ##L = mr^2\omega##, where ##\dot\phi## = ##\omega##
Relevant Equations
##\vec{L} = \vec{P} \times \vec{r}##
##\vec{L} = \vec{P} \times\vec{r}##

##L = mvr sin \phi##, where P = mv

Since ##\vec{r}## and ##\vec{v}## are always perpendicular, ##\phi## = 90.

Then, ##L = mvr##

At this point, I don't see how to get ##L = mvr = mr^2\omega##, using ##\omega = \dot{\phi}##

I know that ##\omega = \frac{v}{r}##. However, the way the question if written, I'm wondering if there's another by way using the angle ##\phi##.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Redwaves said:
Homework Statement:: Consider a planet orbiting the fixed sun. Take the plane of the planet's orbit to be the xy plane, with the sun at the origin and label the planet's position by polar coordinates (##r,\phi##). Show that the planet's angular momentum has magnitude ##L = mr^2\omega##, where ##\dot\phi## = ##\omega##
Relevant Equations:: ##\vec{L} = \vec{P} \times \vec{r}##

##\vec{L} = \vec{P} \times\vec{r}##

##L = mvr sin \phi##, where P = mv

Since ##\vec{r}## and ##\vec{v}## are always perpendicular, ##\phi## = 90.

Then, ##L = mvr##

At this point, I don't see how to get ##L = mvr = mr^2\omega##, using ##\omega = \dot{\phi}##

I know that ##\omega = \frac{v}{r}##. However, the way the question if written, I'm wondering if there's another by way using the angle ##\phi##.
You are confusing two uses of the variable name ##\phi##.
In "where ##\dot\phi## = ##\omega##", ##\phi## is the angle in the XY plane as a polar coordinate.
In ##L = mvr sin \phi##, it is the angle between the vector ##\vec{P}## and the vector ##\vec r##.
 
haruspex said:
You are confusing two uses of the variable name ##\phi##.
In "where ##\dot\phi## = ##\omega##", ##\phi## is the angle in the XY plane as a polar coordinate.
In ##L = mvr sin \phi##, it is the angle between the vector ##\vec{P}## and the vector ##\vec r##.
Isn't ##\dot{\phi} = \frac{d\phi}{dt}##, which is ##\frac{\Delta\phi}{\Delta t}## where t -> 0

Thus, we are using ##\phi## the angle.
 
Redwaves said:
Isn't ##\dot{\phi} = \frac{d\phi}{dt}##, which is ##\frac{\Delta\phi}{\Delta t}## where t -> 0
Yes, but the ##{\phi} ## in ##\omega=\dot\phi## is the angle around the sun in the XY plane. I.e. if we write the coordinates in polar, the position of the planet at time t is ##\vec {r(t)}=(r(t),\phi(t))##. Clearly this angle is not always 90°.

In the equation ##L = mvr sin \phi##, ##{\phi} ## has a completely different meaning. It is the angle between the vector ##\vec v= \dot {\vec r }(t)## and the vector ##\vec r##. For circular motion, this angle is always 90°.

To avoid confusion, write ##L = mvr \sin (\psi)## instead.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top