Angular momentum of the Universe

In summary: Lambda CDM if it agrees with many other predictions of Lambda CDM.I don't know what you mean by "many other predictions of Lambda CDM".
  • #1
rootone
3,395
946
It explains very well many aspects of the Universe.
Why should there be any angular momentum though?
The idea that the Universe is itself intrisically rotating doesn't make sense.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
rootone said:
The idea that the Universe is itself intrisically rotating doesn't make sense.
Right. Because it isn't. What made you think it is? If it were rotating then it would have a center and thus a preferred frame of reference. You are certainly right that this doesn't make sense (goes against evidence)
 
  • #3
rootone said:
The idea that the Universe is itself intrisically rotating

Where did you encounter this idea?
 
  • #4
Tbh, I don't recall where I first heard of the notation that the Universe as a whole has angular momentum.
It isn't something I made up though, and I rejected that for the same reasons as pointed out by Phinds.
It might have been better not to have mentioned a proposal I had already dismissed.

However having dismissed that, the question still remains.
Why does rotation of massive bodies exist at all?, and not just exist but is a fundamental feature of massive bodies.
Isn't the implication of this that at a very early time the evolution of the Universe would have to be asymmetric,
(As in being not isotropic)Edit: (So you know I didn't pull the idea of thin air before rejecting it)
Here is a reference to a rotating universe model, though it isn't where I heard of the idea originally.
https://arxiv.org/ftp/astro-ph/papers/0601/0601659.pdf
 
Last edited:
  • #5
rootone said:
Isn't the implication of this that at a very early time the evolution of the Universe would have to be asymmetric

No. Individual systems within the universe can have nonzero angular momentum even if the total angular momentum of the universe is zero. (More precisely, the concept of "total angular momentum of the universe" isn't even well-defined, but heuristically, the angular momenta of all the individual systems should "average out" to zero in some suitable sense.)
 
  • #6
rootone said:
Here is a reference to a rotating universe model

I know it's on arxiv, but there is no sign that it's been looked at by anyone except the author. I haven't had time to read through the paper in detail, and I'm not sure it's worth it; I would just point out that whatever model is described in the paper might not be a valid one, and I would not rely on it as a source.
 
  • #7
I have heard of this as well, not that my two cents is worth much, but I have read that it has been constrained to a small amount of rotation. As per arXiv:1207.6640v1
"Cosmological Birefringence (CB), a rotation of the polarization plane of radiation coming to us from distant astrophysical sources, may reveal parity violation in either the electromagnetic or gravitational sectors of the fundamental interactions in nature. Until only recently this phenomenon could be probed with only radio observations or observations at UV wavelengths. Recently, there is a substantial effort to constrain such non-standard models using observations of the rotation of the polarization plane of cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation. This can be done via measurements of the B-modes of the CMB or by measuring its TB and EB correlations which vanish in the standard model. In this paper we show that EBcorrelations-based estimator is the best for upcoming polarization experiments. The EB based estimator surpasses other estimators because it has the smallest noise and of all the estimators is least affected by systematics. Current polarimeters are optimized for the detection of B-mode polarization from either primordial gravitational waves or by large scale structure via gravitational lensing. In the paper we also study optimization of CMB experiments for the detection of cosmological birefringence, in the presence of instrumental systematics, which by themselves are capable of producing EB correlations; potentially mimicking CB."
I would think it is about as important as redshift, since if everything is rotating as the metric is expanding... I imagine you get my drift.

Small edit to clarify what is quoted.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #8
PeterDonis said:
I would just point out that whatever model is described in the paper might not be a valid one, and I would not rely on it as a source.

jerromyjon said:
I have heard of this as well, not that my two cents is worth much, but I have read that it has been constrained to a small amount of rotation.

Regarding validity, any model that produces similar results to Lambda CDM, where the ratio of all universal matter to ordinary universal matter is 2 * Pi +/- 1%, can be considered just as valid as the Lambda CDM model.
 
  • #9
Laurie K said:
any model that produces similar results to Lambda CDM, where the ratio of all universal matter to ordinary universal matter is 2 * Pi +/- 1%, can be considered just as valid as the Lambda CDM model.

I don't know what you mean by "all universal matter" and "ordinary universal matter". Nor do I know where you're getting the ratio of ##2 \pi## from.

In any case, a model can be considered "just as valid" as the Lambda CDM model only if it matches all of the confirmed predictions of the Lamda CDM model, which predicts a lot more than just the ratios of dark energy/dark matter/ordinary matter. If you know of such a model, please give a reference.
 
  • #10
So far so good, I think we mostly agree that the idea of the Universe as a whole having angular momentum doesn't make sense.
I do appreciate the math efforts of those who think it could be possible though, it's well above my level of math.
OK, so if the Universe after the big bang event is perfectly isotropic, then why do things rotate, they shouldn't do that.
 
  • #11
rootone said:
if the Universe after the big bang event is perfectly isotropic

It isn't. Perfect isotropy is an idealization.
 
  • Like
Likes rootone
  • #12
PeterDonis said:
It isn't. Perfect isotropy is an idealization.
Aha!, quantum scale randomness then?
Brownion motion?
 
  • #13
rootone said:
quantum scale randomness then?

In inflationary cosmology, the deviations from perfect isotropy in the early universe are ultimately due to quantum fluctuations being amplified during the inflationary era. But perfect isotropy is an idealization in any context, just from ordinary classical randomness.
 

1. What is angular momentum of the Universe?

The angular momentum of the Universe is a measure of the rotational motion of all matter and energy within the Universe. It is a fundamental property that plays a crucial role in the formation and evolution of celestial bodies and structures.

2. How is the angular momentum of the Universe calculated?

The angular momentum of the Universe can be calculated by taking into account the mass, velocity, and distance of all the objects within the Universe. This calculation can be complex and requires advanced mathematical and computational techniques.

3. Why is the angular momentum of the Universe important?

The angular momentum of the Universe is important because it is a key factor in understanding the motion and dynamics of celestial bodies and structures. It also plays a role in the overall stability and balance of the Universe.

4. Does the angular momentum of the Universe change over time?

Yes, the angular momentum of the Universe can change over time due to various factors such as the interactions between celestial bodies, gravitational forces, and the expansion of the Universe.

5. Can the angular momentum of the Universe be affected by external factors?

Yes, the angular momentum of the Universe can be influenced by external factors such as collisions with other galaxies, the presence of dark matter, and the overall distribution of matter and energy within the Universe.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
410
Replies
1
Views
291
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
840
Replies
5
Views
954
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
795
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
753
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
990
Back
Top