Angular Momentum Problem: Torque after fall

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the calculation of angular momentum and torque in a physics problem. The correct approach involves using the formula for torque as the product of distance and the force of gravity, rather than relying on momentum. It is clarified that torque is not the same as the change in angular momentum, which can lead to misunderstandings in solving the problem. The problem's lack of clarity is noted, particularly for first-year students, as it does not adequately guide them on how to approach the calculations. Ultimately, the focus should be on understanding the relationship between torque and angular momentum without overcomplicating the solution with unnecessary variables.
JoeyBob
Messages
256
Reaction score
29
Homework Statement
See attached
Relevant Equations
Torque=change in angular momentum
I know how to get to the answer but that's what is confusing me.

To find final velocity I multiply the acceleration by the time the object fell.

Then multiply the velocity by the mass to get momentum.

Now the angular momentum is r x p.

Since the initial angular momentum was 0, this was also the change in angular momentum.

The problem is that to solve this youre not suppose to multiply by the time. You are suppose to do r*a*d*m to get the answer (599.56).

Why don't I need the momentum to find the angular momentum here??
 

Attachments

  • Question.PNG
    Question.PNG
    11.1 KB · Views: 179
Physics news on Phys.org
Torque=rate of change in angular momentum w.r.t. time.
It is also ## \vec{r} \times \vec{F} ##, where the ## \times ## is a vector cross product.
## m \cdot a \cdot d ## should be the correct answer, where ## a=9.8 m/sec^2 ##. I don't get an ## r ## in the product.
We, as homework helpers, generally aren't supposed to give the answer, but this one is almost one that involves a definition. Meanwhile, vector cross products may not have been covered yet in your coursework.

The problem gives you a lot of extra detail, but really doesn't give you much direction in how to solve it.
 
Charles Link said:
Torque=rate of change in angular momentum w.r.t. time.
It is also ## \vec{r} \times \vec{F} ##, where the ## \times ## is a vector cross product.
## m \cdot a \cdot d ## should be the correct answer, where ## a=9.8 m/sec^2 ##. I don't get an ## r ## in the product.
We, as homework helpers, generally aren't supposed to give the answer, but this one is almost one that involves a definition. Meanwhile, vector cross products may not have been covered yet in your coursework.
Yeah I meant d.

So torque here would be d x force of gravity.

But isn't torque also the change in angular momentum? Why does calculating the change in angular momentum give the wrong answer?
 
The torque multiplied by the time will give the change in angular momentum.
Unless my arithmetic is off, they don't have ## h=at^2/2 ##, where ## a=9.8 ##.
I get that ## t \approx 19 ## seconds, when it hits the ground.
Maybe they wanted you to simply conclude that at ## t=15.8 ## seconds, the object hadn't reached the ground yet.
In any case, the problem could be a little more clear to the reader, especially when I think it is supposed to be for a first year student.
 
JoeyBob said:
torque here would be d x force of gravity.
Yes.
JoeyBob said:
isnt torque also the change in angular momentum?
No. A change in angular momentum is still an angular momentum, just as a change in velocity is dimensionally a velocity, not an acceleration.
Charles Link said:
Maybe they wanted you to simply conclude that at t=15.8 seconds, the object hadn't reached the ground yet.
It asks for the torque due to gravity, so whether it has hit the ground is irrelevant. I think they are just leaving open the possibility that the torque varies with time ("##\tau(t)##"), and it is up to the student to figure out that it doesn't.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
858
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
3K
Replies
335
Views
15K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K