Angular Momentum Question: M_z from Landau-Lifgarbagez p21

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of angular momentum equations from the Lagrangian framework as presented in Landau-Lifgarbagez, specifically on page 21. The equation for the z-component of angular momentum, M_z=\sum_a \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\phi}_a}, is established as the canonical momentum for each degree of freedom. The transformation to the second equation, M_z=\sum_a m_a(x_a \dot{y}_a-y_a \dot{x}_a), involves a change of variables from polar coordinates (r, φ) to Cartesian coordinates (x, y). Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the underlying mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics
  • Understanding of canonical momentum
  • Knowledge of coordinate transformations from polar to Cartesian
  • Basic grasp of angular momentum concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lagrangian in classical mechanics
  • Learn about canonical momentum and its applications
  • Explore coordinate transformations in mechanics, specifically from polar to Cartesian coordinates
  • Review angular momentum calculations in various coordinate systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics, as well as educators looking to clarify concepts related to angular momentum and Lagrangian dynamics.

Piano man
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
I've got a question about angular momentum arising from Landau-Lifgarbagez p21.

Firstly, I'm not sure where this equation comes from:

M_z=\sum_a \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\phi}_a}

and from that, how do you get

M_z=\sum_a m_a(x_a \dot{y}_a-y_a \dot{x}_a)

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The partial derivative of the Lagrangian with respect to the time derivative of a space variable is the canonical momentum for that degree of freedom.
The second equation comes from a change of variables from r,phi to x,y.
You may want to study the Lagrangian in a good mechanics book.
 
Ok, I still don't really follow.
When you say 'canonical momentum', is that derived from somewhere or is it empirical?
And I've been trying to change the variables to get the second equation, but I'm not getting anywhere. How does it work?
Thanks for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K