Angular Momentum/Rotation Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Felix83
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angular
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the hit point (h) above the center of a billiard ball needed for it to roll without slipping at a speed of 14.10 m/s. The initial velocity of 15.0 m/s is deemed irrelevant for this calculation. The problem involves using the rolling motion equation V=ωR and the kinetic coefficient of friction (0.214) to determine the necessary parameters. Key calculations include finding the angular velocity, frictional force, and torque to derive the value of h. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between linear and angular motion in this context.
Felix83
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
A uniform billiard ball with radius R= 7.00 cm rests on a billiard table. At one moment, the ball received a hit from the horizontal direction. Hit point is h above the center of the ball. Then, the ball begins to move with a velocity V0= 15.0 m/s. The kinetic coeffient between table and the slipping ball is 0.214. In order that the ball can roll without slipping with a speed V= 14.10 m/s, what the value of h should be?

I'm stumped on this one, I tried several different ways, all of which the computer tells me is wrong. But the numbers I got didn't make any sense anyway. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about you post yours...?To see where they went wrong.

Daniel.
 


It seems like there may be a misunderstanding of the problem here. The question is asking for the value of h, which is the hit point above the center of the ball, in order for the ball to roll without slipping with a speed of 14.10 m/s. This means that the ball will be rolling and not sliding on the table. The initial velocity given (V0=15.0 m/s) is not relevant for this part of the problem.

To solve this problem, we can use the equation for rolling motion without slipping: V=ωR, where V is the linear velocity of the ball, ω is the angular velocity, and R is the radius of the ball. We also know that the kinetic coefficient (μ) between the ball and the table is 0.214.

First, we can find the angular velocity of the ball at a speed of 14.10 m/s by rearranging the equation: ω=V/R. Plugging in the values, we get ω=14.10 m/s ÷ 0.07 m = 201.43 rad/s.

Next, we can use the definition of kinetic coefficient to find the frictional force (F) acting on the ball: F=μmg, where m is the mass of the ball and g is the acceleration due to gravity. We can find the mass of the ball by using the formula for the volume of a sphere: V=4/3πR³. Plugging in the values, we get m=4/3π(0.07 m)³ρ, where ρ is the density of the ball. We can assume a density of 1 g/cm³ for a billiard ball, so m=0.229 kg. Plugging this into the equation for frictional force, we get F=0.214(0.229 kg)(9.8 m/s²)=0.48 N.

Finally, we can use the definition of torque (τ) to find the distance h: τ=FR, where R is the radius of the ball. Plugging in the values, we get τ=0.48 N(0.07 m)=0.0336 Nm. We also know that τ=Iα, where I is the moment of inertia of the ball and α is the angular acceleration. The moment of inertia for a solid sphere is 2/5MR², so I
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
849
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K