Angular Resolution of Telescopes at 500nm: Formula & Explanation

Click For Summary
Technological advancements allow for linking visible-light telescopes to achieve angular resolution equivalent to a single telescope 300 meters in size. The angular resolution formula discussed is sin(theta) = 1.220 * wavelength/diameter, where the wavelength is 500 nanometers (5.00 x 10^-7 m). The diameter of the telescope's mirror is crucial for calculating the resolution. Participants clarify that the size of a telescope refers to the diameter of its mirror. Understanding these concepts is essential for accurate astronomical observations.
oldspice1212
Messages
149
Reaction score
2
Technological advances are now making it possible to link visible-light telescopes so that they can achieve the same angular resolution as a single telescope over 300 meters in size.

What is the angular resolution (diffraction limit) of such a system of telescopes for observations at a wavelength of 500 nanometers?


I was wondering if anyone has an idea on what the angular resolution formula is, I know there is one but I can't recall it..and when it says 500 nm it's 5.00*10^-9 m right? Been a while since I've dealt with waves.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
oldspice1212 said:
I was wondering if anyone has an idea on what the angular resolution formula is, I know there is one but I can't recall it..
Why struggle with recollection when you can "look it up"? Try your favorite search engine, wiki, etc.
and when it says 500 nm it's 5.00*10^-9 m right?
No, that would be 5nm. 1nm = 1*10-9 m.
 
^ Yeah sorry i meant -7 lol and I still can't figure it out, I need the diameter of the telescope or something... I think the formula is sin theta = 1.220 * wavelength/ diameter but I have no clue how to get the diameter?
 
How big was the single telescope? Hint: when you talk about the size of a telescope, you are talking about the diameter of the mirror which collects the incoming light.
 
300m?
 
nvm got it
 
Last edited:
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K