Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Stargazing Spatial and Angular Resolution of a Earth observing Telescope

  1. Sep 25, 2011 #1
    Does anybody know of a good reference for determining the required diameter of an earth observing telescope's primary mirror? I am trying to find determine a rough estimate for a design I am working on. So far I have found the equation

    Sin[itex]\theta[/itex] = 1.220 [itex]\lambda[/itex]/D

    for angular resolution and

    [itex]\Delta[/itex]l = 1.220 d[itex]\lambda[/itex]/D

    for spatial resolution, where D is the Diameter, d is the distance, lambda is the wavelength. I've never really dealt with optics like this (minus like a class in high school long ago) but I do know my results are ridiculous at a 12 cm primary for a 500Km orbit

    My confusion comes from what the angle I use is. The satellite would be orbiting between 200 and 500 Km and be taking 25 x 25 km images in full colour.

    If anyone can help me with this it would be greatly appreciated.
    Last edited: Sep 25, 2011
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 25, 2011 #2
    The angle is the object size (I assume you're talking about an orbiting telescope looking down on Earth?) divided by the altitude. You can forget the sines and tangents, the angles are tiny so just use the angle in radians. Note the angle is the half-angle, so the diffraction limit to "resolve" an object of diameter L requires a telescope diameter D given by D = 2.44*d*lamda/L. I use quotes on "resolve" because it's actually a lot more complicated than this simple formula.
  4. Sep 25, 2011 #3
    Thank you. I just had just found something saying just this and this confirms that I have been using every angle but the right one! This formula should do for a first approximation. I just need to give the guys in the structures and mechanisms group an idea of how big this is going to be (seeing as they need to get it into the launch vehicle fairing). This has been a great help.
  5. Sep 25, 2011 #4
    Hmmm... the data still seems wonky. According to this for 1m resolution at 600km I only need a mirror of about 1.1 m, which doesn't seem right given that every commercial sat I know has a mirror around 1.6 m and has a working resolution in colour of around 4m.
  6. Sep 25, 2011 #5
    It's not just limited by diffraction, in fact that's probably the least of your worries.
  7. Sep 25, 2011 #6
    Optical aberrations being what I need to reduce.
    Last edited: Sep 25, 2011
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook