Angular speed and intertia problem

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a student on a rotating stool who pulls weights inward, affecting angular speed and inertia. The conservation of angular momentum equation, Iiwi=Ifwf, is correctly identified as essential for solving the problem. Participants emphasize the need to calculate the moment of inertia accurately, distinguishing between the constant moment of inertia of the stool and the variable moment of inertia of the weights. The parallel axis theorem is suggested for calculating the moment of inertia when the weights are moved. Ultimately, the new angular speed and kinetic energy can be derived from these calculations.
coey
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm kinda having trouble figuring out this problem...i already know that i have to use conservation of angular momentum Iiwi=Ifwf but I'm having trouble calculating the key part, the second moment of inertia. I'm pretty sure that im' supposed to be using this form of the calculation of inertia, I=Mr^2... but i still can't seem to solve it... like when i use it to test whether the numbers work out for the first moment of inertia 2.92 = 2.92*2 * 1.09^2, these numbers don't work out.



A student sits on a freely rotating stool holding two weights, each of mass 2.92 kg. When his arms are extended horizontally, the weights are 1.09 m from the axis of rotation and he rotates with an angular speed of 0.746 rad/s.

The moment of inertia of the student plus stool is 2.92 kg · m2 and is assumed to be constant. The student pulls the weights in horizontally to a position 0.307 m from the rotation axis.


Question: Find the new angular speed and find the kinetic energy before and after he pulls the weight inward.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
coey said:
I'm kinda having trouble figuring out this problem...i already know that i have to use conservation of angular momentum Iiwi=Ifwf but I'm having trouble calculating the key part, the second moment of inertia. I'm pretty sure that im' supposed to be using this form of the calculation of inertia, I=Mr^2... but i still can't seem to solve it... like when i use it to test whether the numbers work out for the first moment of inertia 2.92 = 2.92*2 * 1.09^2, these numbers don't work out.



A student sits on a freely rotating stool holding two weights, each of mass 2.92 kg. When his arms are extended horizontally, the weights are 1.09 m from the axis of rotation and he rotates with an angular speed of 0.746 rad/s.

The moment of inertia of the student plus stool is 2.92 kg · m2 and is assumed to be constant. The student pulls the weights in horizontally to a position 0.307 m from the rotation axis.


Question: Find the new angular speed and find the kinetic energy before and after he pulls the weight inward.

A number of issues here:

1. Never, EVER solve a physics problem by plugging in numbers at the very beginning. This is a big no-no and will create hell in your attempts at solving physics problems later on. Assign symbols to all the relevant quantities and solve the problem algebraically first. This also allows whoever is looking at your work to follow what you are doing clearer.

2. What is "The moment of inertia of the student plus stool is 2.92 kg · m2..."? m2? In any case, I will assume that I, the moment of inertia of the student+stool is known (at least to you).

3. There are TWO moment of inertias here: (i) moment of inertia of student+stool, which is I, which doesn't change, and (ii) moment of inertia of the two masses, which does change. Call it I1 and I2 for before and after.

Then your conservation equation should look like

(I+I1)w1 = (I+I2)w2

You want to solve for w2. You know I, you can calculate I1 and I2 (you were given the radius of revolution for each case), and you were given w1. Thus, w2 can be solved.

From this, the rotational KE should be baby algebra.

Zz.
 


Hi there, it seems like you are struggling with a problem involving angular speed and inertia. To solve this problem, you are correct in using the conservation of angular momentum equation, Iiwi=Ifwf. However, you are also correct in saying that you need to calculate the second moment of inertia (I) in order to use this equation.

The formula for calculating the moment of inertia of a point mass is I=Mr^2, where M is the mass and r is the distance from the axis of rotation. However, in this problem, we are dealing with two point masses (the weights) at different distances from the axis of rotation. In order to calculate the moment of inertia for this system, we need to use the parallel axis theorem, which states that I=Icm+Md^2, where Icm is the moment of inertia about the center of mass and d is the distance between the center of mass and the axis of rotation.

In this problem, the student plus stool system can be treated as a point mass located at the center of mass, which is in the middle of the stool. Therefore, the moment of inertia for the student plus stool system is simply I=Mr^2, where M is the total mass of the student and stool and r is the distance from the axis of rotation to the center of mass.

To calculate the moment of inertia for the system with the weights pulled in, we need to use the parallel axis theorem. The distance between the center of mass and the new position of the weights is 0.307 m, so the moment of inertia for the system with the weights pulled in is I=Icm+Md^2=Mr^2+(2*2.92 kg)*(0.307 m)^2=2.92 kg · m^2 + 0.898 kg · m^2=3.818 kg · m^2.

Now, using the conservation of angular momentum equation, we can solve for the new angular speed. Plugging in the initial and final moments of inertia and the initial angular speed, we get:

Iiwi=Ifwf
(2.92 kg · m2)(0.746 rad/s)=(3.818 kg · m2)(wf)
wf=(2.92 kg · m2)(0.746 rad/s)/(3.818 kg · m2)=0.572 rad/s

To calculate the kinetic energy before and after the weights are pulled in
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
15K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K