MHB Angular Speed of Smaller Wheel

AI Thread Summary
To determine the angular speed of the smaller wheel, the relationship between the linear speeds of both wheels must be used, given by the equations v = rω1 and v = Rω2. With r at 6 cm and R at 10 cm, and the larger wheel's angular speed (ω2) at 100 rpm, the formula ω1 = (Rω2)/r leads to ω1 = (10 * 100)/6. This calculation results in ω1 = 500/3 rpm. Converting this to radians per minute gives the final answer as 1000π/3 radians/min.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Let r = radius

See picture.

If r = 6 cm, R = 10 cm, and the angular speed of the larger wheel is 100 rpm, determine the angular speed of the smaller wheel in radians per minute.

Again, 1 revolution = 2 pi radians.

I need to use w = θ/t.

So, θ = 100 rpm • 2 pi radians.

θ = 200 pi radians

w = 200 pi radians/min, which is my answer.

At this point, I doubted that my answer is right because it did not take long to find w or omega representing the angular speed.

The book's answer is 1000/3 radians/min.

What did I forget to do?

View attachment 7910
 

Attachments

  • sDraw_2018-03-07_02-12-51.png
    sDraw_2018-03-07_02-12-51.png
    8.9 KB · Views: 119
Mathematics news on Phys.org
f r = 6 cm, R = 10 cm, and the angular speed of the larger wheel is 100 rpm, determine the angular speed of the smaller wheel in radians per minute.

$v = r \omega_1$, where $\omega_1$ is the angular speed of the smaller wheel

$v = R \omega_2$, where $\omega_2$ is the angular speed of the larger wheel.

the belt connecting the two wheels has a fixed linear speed, $v$ ...

$\implies r \omega_1 = R \omega_2$

$\omega_1 = \dfrac{R \omega_2}{r} = \dfrac{10 \cdot 100}{6} = \dfrac{500}{3} \, rpm$

convert $\omega_1$ to radians per minute ...

$\dfrac{500 \, rev}{3 \, min} \cdot \dfrac{2\pi \, rad}{rev} = \dfrac{1000\pi}{3} \, rad/min$
 
Nicely-done. I will try your solution steps for this question to answer the textbook question where r = 6 cm and R = 10 cm.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top