Angular Velocity: Vector or Not?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of angular velocity, specifically whether it is classified as a vector or not, and the implications this has for operations such as cross products involving angular velocity and other vectors. The scope includes theoretical considerations and mathematical reasoning related to vector classification in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that angular velocity is not a vector, questioning whether the cross product of the radius vector and angular velocity results in a vector.
  • Others clarify that angular velocity is an axial vector, which transforms differently under space reflections compared to polar vectors, and provide mathematical relationships involving axial vectors and tensors.
  • One participant notes that in two dimensions, angular velocity can be treated as a scalar, while in three dimensions, it is considered a pseudovector, maintaining its direction under mirror reflections.
  • Participants discuss the properties of cross products, stating that the cross product of two polar vectors yields a pseudovector, while the cross product of a pseudovector and a vector results in a vector.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the classification of angular velocity, with some arguing it is a pseudovector while others maintain it is not a vector at all. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these classifications on related vector operations.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific mathematical properties and transformations of vectors and pseudovectors, but there are no settled definitions or consensus on the implications of these properties for angular velocity.

e2m2a
Messages
354
Reaction score
13
I understand that angular velocity is technically not a vector so does that mean the cross product of the radius vector and the angular velocity vector, the tangential vector, is also not a vector?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Angular velocity is an axial vector, i.e., it transforms as ##\vec{\omega} \rightarrow \vec{\omega}## under space reflections, while a polar vector like the usual velocity transforms as ##\vec{v} \rightarrow -\vec{v}##. Wrt. rotations axial vectors transform in the same as polar vectors.

An axial vector is always equivalent to an antisymmetric tensor. For Cartesian components you can map the axial-vector components to the tensor components via
$$\Omega_{jk}=\epsilon_{jkl} \omega_l$$
and the other way
$$\omega_l=\frac{1}{2} \epsilon_{jkl} \Omega_{jk}.$$
In both formulae the Einstein summation convention is used, and ##\epsilon_{jkl}## is the Levi-Civita symbol which is defined by ##\epsilon_{123}=1## and being antisymmetric under exchange of any index pair. This implies that it's 0 if at least two of the indices are equal.

It's also easy to see that the cross product of two polar or two axial vectors is an axial vector, while the cross product of a polar and axial vector is a polar vector.
 
e2m2a said:
I am told that angular velocity is not a vector so does that mean the cross product between the radius vector and angular velocity vector, the tangential velocity vector, is also not a vector?
If you are working in the two dimensional plane then angular velocity has only one dimension. It is a scalar.

If you are working in three dimensions then angular velocity is a pseudovector. It has magnitude and direction, but if you do a mirror reflection on your coordinate system so that all of your vectors change signs, the pseudovectors remain unchanged. So picky mathematical types do not want to call them vectors.

Taking the cross product of the angular momentum [pseudo]vector and the radius vector will do just fine to get you a velocity vector.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and berkeman
In three dimensions, the cross product of two (polar) vectors gives a pseudovector. The cross product of a pseudovector and a vector gives a vector. The cross product of two pseudovectors gives a pseudovector.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and jbriggs444
jbriggs444 said:
If you are working in the two dimensional plane then angular velocity has only one dimension. It is a scalar.

If you are working in three dimensions then angular velocity is a pseudovector. It has magnitude and direction, but if you do a mirror reflection on your coordinate system so that all of your vectors change signs, the pseudovectors remain unchanged. So picky mathematical types do not want to call them vectors.

Taking the cross product of the angular momentum [pseudo]vector and the radius vector will do just fine to get you a velocity vector.
Ok. Thanks for the explanation.
 
Dale said:
In three dimensions, the cross product of two (polar) vectors gives a pseudovector. The cross product of a pseudovector and a vector gives a vector. The cross product of two pseudovectors gives a pseudovector.
All right. Thanks. That clears things up.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
906