Angular Velocity: Vector or Not?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Angular velocity is classified as an axial vector, which transforms under space reflections differently than polar vectors. The discussion clarifies that while angular velocity has magnitude and direction in three dimensions, it is considered a pseudovector due to its behavior under mirror reflections. The cross product of two polar vectors results in a pseudovector, while the cross product of a pseudovector and a polar vector yields a vector. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurately applying concepts in physics and mathematics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of axial vectors and polar vectors
  • Familiarity with the Levi-Civita symbol (##\epsilon_{jkl}##)
  • Knowledge of the Einstein summation convention
  • Basic concepts of vector mathematics and cross products
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of axial and polar vectors in depth
  • Learn about the Levi-Civita symbol and its applications in tensor analysis
  • Explore the implications of pseudovectors in physics
  • Investigate the mathematical foundations of cross products in three-dimensional space
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, mathematics, and engineering who seek to deepen their understanding of vector classifications and their applications in rotational dynamics.

e2m2a
Messages
354
Reaction score
13
I understand that angular velocity is technically not a vector so does that mean the cross product of the radius vector and the angular velocity vector, the tangential vector, is also not a vector?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Angular velocity is an axial vector, i.e., it transforms as ##\vec{\omega} \rightarrow \vec{\omega}## under space reflections, while a polar vector like the usual velocity transforms as ##\vec{v} \rightarrow -\vec{v}##. Wrt. rotations axial vectors transform in the same as polar vectors.

An axial vector is always equivalent to an antisymmetric tensor. For Cartesian components you can map the axial-vector components to the tensor components via
$$\Omega_{jk}=\epsilon_{jkl} \omega_l$$
and the other way
$$\omega_l=\frac{1}{2} \epsilon_{jkl} \Omega_{jk}.$$
In both formulae the Einstein summation convention is used, and ##\epsilon_{jkl}## is the Levi-Civita symbol which is defined by ##\epsilon_{123}=1## and being antisymmetric under exchange of any index pair. This implies that it's 0 if at least two of the indices are equal.

It's also easy to see that the cross product of two polar or two axial vectors is an axial vector, while the cross product of a polar and axial vector is a polar vector.
 
e2m2a said:
I am told that angular velocity is not a vector so does that mean the cross product between the radius vector and angular velocity vector, the tangential velocity vector, is also not a vector?
If you are working in the two dimensional plane then angular velocity has only one dimension. It is a scalar.

If you are working in three dimensions then angular velocity is a pseudovector. It has magnitude and direction, but if you do a mirror reflection on your coordinate system so that all of your vectors change signs, the pseudovectors remain unchanged. So picky mathematical types do not want to call them vectors.

Taking the cross product of the angular momentum [pseudo]vector and the radius vector will do just fine to get you a velocity vector.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and berkeman
In three dimensions, the cross product of two (polar) vectors gives a pseudovector. The cross product of a pseudovector and a vector gives a vector. The cross product of two pseudovectors gives a pseudovector.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and jbriggs444
jbriggs444 said:
If you are working in the two dimensional plane then angular velocity has only one dimension. It is a scalar.

If you are working in three dimensions then angular velocity is a pseudovector. It has magnitude and direction, but if you do a mirror reflection on your coordinate system so that all of your vectors change signs, the pseudovectors remain unchanged. So picky mathematical types do not want to call them vectors.

Taking the cross product of the angular momentum [pseudo]vector and the radius vector will do just fine to get you a velocity vector.
Ok. Thanks for the explanation.
 
Dale said:
In three dimensions, the cross product of two (polar) vectors gives a pseudovector. The cross product of a pseudovector and a vector gives a vector. The cross product of two pseudovectors gives a pseudovector.
All right. Thanks. That clears things up.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
821
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K