In learning QFT, I've found that the renormalization group is often introduced with the MS scheme. I noticed that if one uses the on-shell scheme instead and calculates the anomalous field dimension using(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[itex]\gamma_{\phi} = \mu \frac{\partial \ln Z_{\phi}}{\partial \mu} [/itex]

one finds that [itex]\gamma_{\phi} = 0[/itex]. Is this correct or am I making a mistake? What is the physical interpretation?

I've found this to be the case for both [itex]\phi^3[/itex] and [itex]\phi^4[/itex] theory. I haven't learned QED or anything about QFTs in particle physics so I'm not sure how it plays out there.

I wasn't sure if this is the place to post, or the homework or high-energy section; if this is not the right place, apologies and please feel free to move this thread.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A Anomalous field dimension in the on-shell scheme

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Anomalous field dimension | Date |
---|---|

B Amplitude of a photon's E and B fields | Saturday at 10:49 AM |

A Can disjoint states be relevant for the same quantum system? | Mar 13, 2018 |

Stupid question on anomalous magnetic moment of the electron | Nov 13, 2012 |

The normal and anomalous Zeeman effect | Sep 25, 2010 |

(Anomalous?) Wick rotation in Fujikawa's method | Aug 27, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**