Anomalous field dimension in the on-shell scheme

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter aqualone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension Field
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of the anomalous field dimension in quantum field theory (QFT) using the on-shell scheme. The user correctly identifies that the anomalous dimension, calculated as \gamma_{\phi} = \mu \frac{\partial \ln Z_{\phi}}{\partial \mu}, results in \gamma_{\phi} = 0 for both massless \phi^3 and \phi^4 theories at one-loop order. This outcome is confirmed by the fact that corrections only appear at two-loop order in massless \phi^4 theory, while \phi^3 theory in six dimensions does yield a one-loop correction as noted in Srednicki's textbook.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory (QFT) principles
  • Familiarity with the renormalization group concepts
  • Knowledge of the MS (Minimal Subtraction) and on-shell renormalization schemes
  • Basic proficiency in calculating anomalous dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the renormalization group flow in QFT
  • Learn about the Minimal Subtraction (MS) scheme in detail
  • Explore the calculation of anomalous dimensions in QED
  • Investigate the implications of two-loop corrections in massless \phi^4 theory
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on quantum field theory, renormalization techniques, and the implications of anomalous dimensions in particle physics.

aqualone
In learning QFT, I've found that the renormalization group is often introduced with the MS scheme. I noticed that if one uses the on-shell scheme instead and calculates the anomalous field dimension using
\gamma_{\phi} = \mu \frac{\partial \ln Z_{\phi}}{\partial \mu}
one finds that \gamma_{\phi} = 0. Is this correct or am I making a mistake? What is the physical interpretation?

I've found this to be the case for both \phi^3 and \phi^4 theory. I haven't learned QED or anything about QFTs in particle physics so I'm not sure how it plays out there.

I wasn't sure if this is the place to post, or the homework or high-energy section; if this is not the right place, apologies and please feel free to move this thread.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In massless \phi^4 theory in 4 dimensions,

<br /> \gamma_{\phi} = O(g^2)<br />

That is, there's no correction until 2-loop, so if you just do the one-loop calculation, you should get zero.

In massless \phi^3 theory in 6 dimensions (where the interaction is renormalizable), Srednicki does the calculation in his book and he does find a one-loop correction. (Note that the one-loop contribution is proportional to the square of the coupling still, unlike the phi4 case).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K