Another age problem in the early universe?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the age problem in the early universe, specifically regarding the observation of highly evolved objects at high redshifts that challenge the standard ΛCDM cosmological model. A recent study published in the Journal of the Korean Astronomical Society identifies 59 Massive Structures of Galaxies (MSGs) with significant discrepancies in number densities compared to simulations, particularly at redshifts greater than 2. The findings suggest that the overabundance of MSGs at these redshifts poses a significant challenge to ΛCDM predictions, necessitating adjustments to initial density fluctuations or baryonic physics to reconcile observations with theoretical models.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the ΛCDM cosmological model
  • Familiarity with redshift measurements and their implications in cosmology
  • Knowledge of Massive Structures of Galaxies (MSGs) and their significance
  • Basic concepts of baryonic physics in galaxy formation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of high redshift observations on the ΛCDM model
  • Explore methods for adjusting initial density fluctuations in cosmological simulations
  • Investigate the role of baryonic physics in galaxy formation and its impact on cosmic structure
  • Study the findings of the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey (GOODS) and its relevance to high redshift galaxies
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and astrophysicists interested in the evolution of the universe, particularly those studying high redshift phenomena and the implications for cosmological models.

Garth
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
3,580
Reaction score
107
I have on several occasions on PF flagged up examples where it appears that there is an age problem in the early universe, in other words highly evolved objects have been observed whose existences are difficult to explain at their high red shifts in the standard \LambdaCDM cosmological model.

Another example has been recently published in the Journal of the Korean Astronomical Society (48: 21-55, February 2015) and on the physics arXiv Massive Structures of Galaxies at High Redshifts in the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey Fields
8. CONCLUSIONS
Using the multi-wavelength data, we identied 59 Massive Structures of Galaxies (MSGs) from the combined areas of the GOODS-South and the GOODS-North fields with signicances of 3:5 - 8 \sigma from z = 0:6 to z ~ 4:5. Among them, ~20% of MSGs show plausible associations with AGN/radio sources.
In comparison with a simulation data set, we find a discrepancy between the observed number densities of MSGs and those from the simulation at z > 1 (M > 7 X 1013M\odot ). The discrepancy becomes more signicant at higher redshifts (z > 2) by a factor of ~5 or more. Even after considering possible systematic effects, our result implies that there are too many massive structures at z > 2 compared to the \LambdaCDM prediction. By tweaking the conditions for the initial density fluctuation or baryonic physics in galaxy formation, one may be able to explain the result within the \LambdaCDM cosmology framework, but as of now the overabundance of MSGs at z > 2 stands as a challenge to the models based on the \LambdaCDM cosmology.
(emphasis mine)

Garth
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes wolram and QuantumQuest
Space news on Phys.org
Given the variance is sensitive to the assumptions employed in the Millenium simulation, this result is not altogether surprising. We already knew, for example, that the apparent mass of high z black holes that power ancient quasars is a challenge to explain under LCDM, so it is reasonable to expect the answer to both enigmas is probably related.
 
Last edited:
As they say in the conclusions of the article Garth quoted:
" By tweaking the conditions for the initial density fluctuation or baryonic physics in galaxy formation, one may be able to explain the result within the ΛCDM cosmology framework. ..."

It sounds like what we have here is a tweaking problem---adjusting the initial conditions of the standard cosmic model to get a better fit to all the data.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
11K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K