Another Electric Charges Q about Leaves

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of an electroscope with two leaves when subjected to a negatively charged rod and a finger touch. Initially, the leaves separate due to the influence of the rod, which induces a negative charge. When a finger touches the top, it provides positive charges, causing the leaves to collapse. Upon removing the finger, the leaves separate again, but not as much as initially, indicating a complex interaction of charges. The confusion arises from the grounding of the finger and the sequence of events described in the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and charge interactions
  • Familiarity with the concept of grounding in electrical circuits
  • Knowledge of the behavior of electroscopes
  • Basic principles of charge induction and conduction
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of charge induction using an electroscope
  • Study the effects of grounding on charge distribution
  • Explore real-world applications of electrostatic principles, such as Van de Graaff generators
  • Learn about the behavior of charged objects in electrostatic equilibrium
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching electrostatics, and anyone interested in the practical applications of electrical charge behavior.

kiplings01
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


set up:(they three are all connected)

l (referred to as top)
/\ (the bottom two called "leaves")

- two leaves are separated when negatively charged rod touches the top of the (vertical thing that connects the two leaves at the bottom)

- when rod is taken away, and a finger is put on the top, the leaves collapse and touch each other.

- when hand is taken away, the leaves separate a little (not as much as the first step)

Q: what are the charges on the two leaves?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I guessed that that both leaves are negatively charged.. because they repel at the last step. the finger charges by contact? providing positive charges.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is something wrong with this question. Are you sure you are correct with the transcription? Usually the order is this:

rod approaches top but does not touch, leaves separate
finger touches, leaves drop
finger is removed, leaves still together
rod is taken away, leaves separate.It's possible that the person whose finger touched the electroscope had a net charge on him, but it is usually considered that the touching finger is "grounded." If the question is stated correctly, then the finger is not grounded (the leaves would remain at net zero charge).

But if the finger had a net charge, positive or negative, and it was touching the electroscope, then the leaves would not have dropped fully as long as the finger was in contact with the scope.

This scenario actually does happen often in the real world, but this is due to the influence of other net charges nearby (thank you Van der Graaff).
 
Sorry, you were right with the rod not touching. And the rod is still there when the finger touches the electroscope. But the question does not say that the leaves were still together when the finger was put on.. (because i was describing the three pictures that the question gave me to describee the process)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K