Another Notation Thing: Del^2 V

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Swapnil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the notation of the Laplace operator, specifically the use of subscripts such as (\theta, \phi) in the expression {\nabla}^2 V_{(\theta, \phi)}. Participants clarify that the subscript indicates the coordinates of the function V on which the Laplace operator operates, with a consensus that the variables should be associated with the operator rather than the potential itself. The notation {{\nabla}^2}_{(\theta, \phi)} V is confirmed to denote variables held constant during integration, particularly in spherical coordinates, while {{\nabla}^2}_r V indicates the variables being integrated over.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Laplace operator and its notation
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates in mathematical physics
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and their applications
  • Basic concepts of vector calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the Laplace operator in spherical coordinates
  • Learn about the implications of subscripts in differential operators
  • Explore the integration of potentials over surfaces in physics
  • Review vector calculus, focusing on partial derivatives and their notation
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying vector calculus and differential equations, particularly those interested in the applications of the Laplace operator in various coordinate systems.

Swapnil
Messages
459
Reaction score
6
What does the subscript (\theta, \phi) mean on the laplace operator? i.e.

{\nabla}^2 V_{(\theta, \phi)}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you provide the context of this notation?
 
hmm, the lapace operator is normally just the nabla^2, perhaps the subscipt specifies the variables/co-ordinates of the function V on which the laplace operator is operating
 
I think the variables should be on the operator, and not on the potential. I've seen it most commonly like this:

\nabla^2_{r'} V(r-r')

where the subscript is to remind us that, as CPL.Luke says, that we are differentiating with respect to the dashed variables (or undashed, as it is in your example)
 
masudr said:
I think the variables should be on the operator, and not on the potential. I've seen it most commonly like this:

\nabla^2_{r'} V(r-r')

where the subscript is to remind us that, as CPL.Luke says, that we are differentiating with respect to the dashed variables (or undashed, as it is in your example)
Ooops..:blushing: I meant to put the subscript on the operator not on the function. Sorry about that.
 
In response to the context of my question, the author who used this notation was integrating the potential on the surface of the sphere. So I guess the notation {{\nabla}^2}_{(\theta, \phi)} V is used to denote the variables which are held constant while the notation {{\nabla}^2}_r V is used to denote the variable(s) which are being integrated over.
 
I've seen \nabla^2_{xy} to mean

\nabla^2_{xy}=\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2}
 
quasar987 said:
I've seen \nabla^2_{xy} to mean

\nabla^2_{xy}=\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2}

This is what i would say. i believe the theta and phi in the subscript in the original post imply spherical coordinates.
 
without the radial derivatives.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
866
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K