Another Question About Angular Momentum in QM

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the Hamiltonian \( H = \frac{p^2}{2m} + V \) commutes with the angular momentum operator \( L_z \) when the potential \( V \) is a function of the radial distance \( r \). The user derives the commutation relation \( [L_z, H] \) and simplifies it to \( [L_z, H] = \frac{1}{2m}[L_z, p^2] + [L_z, V] \). The conclusion drawn is that for the commutation to hold, \( V \) must depend solely on \( r \), as indicated by the structure of the Hamiltonian.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically angular momentum operators
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics and the form of the Hamiltonian
  • Knowledge of commutation relations in quantum mechanics
  • Basic calculus and differential operators in the context of quantum physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of angular momentum in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the role of radial potentials in quantum systems
  • Explore the derivation of commutation relations for various operators
  • Investigate the significance of the Hamiltonian in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on angular momentum and Hamiltonian systems, will benefit from this discussion.

Bobbo Snap
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the Hamiltonian H = (p^2/2m)+V commutes with all three components of L, provided that V depends only on r.

Homework Equations


In previous parts of the problem, I've worked out the following relations:
[L_z,x] = i\hbar y, \quad [L_z,y] = -i\hbar x, \quad [L_z, z] = 0,\\<br /> [L_z, p_x] = i\hbar p_y, \quad [L_z, p_y] = -i\hbar p_x, \quad [L_z, p_z] = 0,\\<br /> [L_z, L_x] = i \hbar L_y, \quad [L_z, r^2] = xy(xp_x - yp_y), \quad [L_z, p^2] = (xp_x -yp_y)p_xp_y

where
p_i = \frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial i}, \quad r^2 = x^2 + y^2 + z^2,\\<br /> p^2 = p_x^2 + p_y^2 + p_z^2, \quad L_z = yp_z - zp_y

The Attempt at a Solution


I started with [L_z, H], expanded it, canceled a bunch of stuff and wound up with,
[L_z, H] = \frac{1}{2m}(xp_yp_x^2 - yp_xp_y^2) + xp_yV - yp_xV + Vxp_y - Vyp_X.
Assuming I did everything right, I need this equation to equal 0 to show L_z commutes with H and the problem suggests that this can only be the case if V is a function of r, but I don't see how to get there. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, so I can simplify that last equation to get
[L_z, H] = \frac{1}{2m}[L_z, p^2] + [L_z, V] =\frac{i\hbar}{2m}(p_y^2 -p_x^2) + [L_z, V]

How does this imply V must be a function of r?
(I guess I should have seen this from the form of the Hamiltonian).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
20K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K