Angular momentum in cartesian coordinates (Lagrangian)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on deriving the expressions for the Cartesian components and magnitude of angular momentum for a particle in cylindrical coordinates (r, φ, z). The key equations used include the momentum equation p_i = mx_i and the angular momentum equation L = r × p. The participant, Julien, successfully derives the angular momentum components, concluding that L_z = mr²ω, where ω is the angular velocity. Julien also clarifies the confusion between using r and ρ in cylindrical coordinates and addresses the implications of setting the z-component to zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cylindrical coordinates (r, φ, z)
  • Familiarity with vector cross products
  • Knowledge of angular momentum concepts in classical mechanics
  • Proficiency in calculus, particularly derivatives and trigonometric identities
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation of angular momentum in spherical coordinates
  • Study the relationship between angular momentum and rotational inertia (Iω)
  • Learn about the implications of coordinate transformations on physical quantities
  • Investigate the use of Lagrangian mechanics in analyzing particle motion
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics, as well as educators looking for examples of angular momentum derivations in different coordinate systems.

JulienB
Messages
408
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



Hi everybody! I would like to discuss with you a problem that I am wondering if I understand it correctly:

Find expressions for the cartesian components and for the magnitude of the angular momentum of a particle in cylindrical coordinates ##(r,\varphi,z)##.

Homework Equations



##p_i = mx_i##, ##\vec{L} = \vec{r} \times \vec{p}##

The Attempt at a Solution



The ##r## confuses me a lot, since we normally use ##\rho## in cylindrical coordinates. I've set up ##\vec{r}## laying in the ##x,y##-plane (i.e. ##z=0##) and ##z## as the rotation axis, but am I allowed to do that? If so, the rest seemed pretty simple:

##x = r \cos \varphi##
##y = r \sin \varphi##
##z = 0##

##\dot{x} = \dot{r} \cos \varphi - r \dot{\varphi} \sin \varphi##
##\dot{y} = \dot{r} \sin \varphi + r \dot{\varphi} \cos \varphi##
##\dot{z} = 0##

##p_x = m\dot{x} = m(\dot{r} \cos \varphi - r \dot{\varphi} \sin \varphi)##
##p_y = m\dot{y} = m(\dot{r} \sin \varphi + r \dot{\varphi} \cos \varphi)##
##p_z = m\dot{z} = 0##

##\vec{L} = \vec{r} \times \vec{p}##

##L_x = y p_z - z p_y = 0##
##L_y = z p_x - x p_z = 0##
##L_z = x p_y - y p_x = mx (\dot{r} \sin \varphi + r \dot{\varphi} \cos \varphi) - my(\dot{r} \cos \varphi - r \dot{\varphi} \sin \varphi)##

As expected from my initial conditions, the angular momentum vector points in the z-direction, and after simplification I get the well-known expression:

##L_z = mr^2\dot{\varphi}##

But I find it strange to set up the ##z## component to ##0##, and if it was not the case the angular momentum vector could be pointing basically any direction depending on what angle ##\theta## it is leaning (in spherical coordinates). I've tried to solve the problem that way, but I can't get my hands on a proper expression for ##x##,##y## and ##z## that does not involve ##\theta## or a very unpractical arctan or I don't know what. Any suggestion?Julien.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually I just found in other pages that apparently for many people the ##r## refers to the ##\rho## I was mentioning. Then my ##x_i## and ##\dot{x}_i## stay the same as before (except with ##\rho## instead of ##r##), and I get those expression for ##\vec{L}##:

##L_x = m[\dot{z}y - z(\dot{\rho} \sin \varphi + \rho \dot{\varphi} \cos \varphi)]##
##L_y = m[z(\dot{\rho} \cos \varphi - \rho \dot{\varphi} \sin \varphi) - \dot{z}x]##
##L_z = mr^2 \dot{\varphi}##

And the magnitude is very long:

##|\vec{L}| = m \sqrt{\dot{z}^2\rho^2 - 2 z\dot{z} \bigg[x\big(\dot{\rho} \cos \varphi - \rho \dot{\varphi} \sin \varphi\big) + y\big(\dot{\rho} \sin \varphi + \rho \dot{\varphi} \cos \varphi\big) \bigg] + z^2 (\dot{\rho}^2 + \rho^2 \dot{\varphi}^2) + \rho^4 \dot{\varphi}^2}##

Could that be? I really thought it was going to be something of the form ##I \omega##, maybe I cannot see it because of the cylindrical coordinates.

EDIT: I just saw I posted in "Advanced Physics" by mistake. I hope it's not too bad, sorry for that.Julien.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K