Another work-energy theorem problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a work-energy theorem problem involving an automobile's stopping distance under varying initial speeds. The original poster presents a scenario where an automobile traveling at 45 km/h stops in 60 m, and they seek to determine the stopping distance at 90 km/h and the initial speed required for a stopping distance of 100 m.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between work, kinetic energy, and stopping distance, with the original poster attempting to apply the work-energy principle. They express confusion regarding the mass of the automobile and how to manipulate the equations without it. Others suggest that since the friction force and mass are constant, these can be canceled out in the equations.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different approaches to the problem, with some providing hints about using ratios derived from the work-energy principle. There is a recognition that the original poster's attempts to calculate acceleration and stopping distances may not be necessary, and guidance has been offered to simplify the problem by focusing on proportional relationships.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is facing challenges due to missing information and the need to apply the work-energy theorem correctly. They are also grappling with the implications of constant mass and friction force in their calculations.

aquamarine08
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Another work-energy theorem problem...

Homework Statement



An automobile traveling at 45 km/h is brought to a stop in 60 m. Assuming that the same conditions (same braking force, neglect reaction time) hold for all cases, (a) what would be the stopping distance for an initial speed of 90 km/h? (b) What would be the initial speed for a stopping distance of 100 m?


Homework Equations



w=[tex]\Delta[/tex]K

K= [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]m[tex]v^{2}[/tex]

w=Fd

The Attempt at a Solution



For (a):
Using the equation w=[tex]\Delta[/tex]K, I was substituting Fd in for w and [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]m[tex]v^{2}[/tex] , making the equation Fd= [tex]\Delta[/tex][tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]m[tex]v^{2}[/tex]. I was going to plug in the given information and then solve for d...but I came across a problem because I don't know what the mass is and I don't know how to use [tex]\Delta[/tex] while solving either.

For (b):
I was going to use the same method to solve for v in the equation Fd= [tex]\Delta[/tex][tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]m[tex]v^{2}[/tex] but I encountered the same problems as before.

Thank you for your help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Make use of the fact that the friction force (and the mass) is the same for all cases.
 
Doc Al said:
Make use of the fact that the friction force (and the mass) is the same for all cases.

Oh ok, so I could cancel out the mass because it's constant?
 
Yes, you end up not needing to know the actual mass.
 
ok, cool, I'll try it out...hopefully it'll work! Thanks so much!
 
Doc Al, I tried what you told me, and this is what I got...

(a)



At first, I didn't have the acceleration but I used a kinematic equation for figure it out:

[tex]d_{1}[/tex]=[tex]d_{0}[/tex]+[tex]V_{0}[/tex]t+[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]a[tex]t^{2}[/tex]

60= 0+90+[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]a
30=90+a
-60 m/[tex]s^{2}[/tex]=a

The negative made sense to me since the car was slowing down and then I used this to find the distance.

w=[tex]\Delta[/tex]k
Fd=[tex]\Delta[/tex]([tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]m[tex]v^{2}[/tex])

ma(d)=[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]m[tex]v_{1}^{2}[/tex]-[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]m[tex]v_{0}^{2}[/tex]

*cancel all "m"s*

a(d)= [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex][tex]v_{1}^{2}[/tex]-[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex][tex]v_{0}^{2}[/tex]

d= [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex][tex](0)^{2}[/tex]-[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex][tex](60)^{2}[/tex] / -60

d=[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex][tex](60)^{2}[/tex] / -60

d=30m

Unfortunately, my answer is wrong...the correct answer is supposed to be 240m.


(b)

w=[tex]\Delta[/tex]k
Fd=[tex]\Delta[/tex]([tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]m[tex]v^{2}[/tex])

ma(d)=[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]m[tex]v_{1}^{2}[/tex]-[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]m[tex]v_{0}^{2}[/tex]

a(d)= [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex][tex]v_{1}^{2}[/tex]-[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex][tex]v_{0}^{2}[/tex]

a(100)= [tex]\frac{1}{2}0^{2}[/tex]-[tex]\frac{1}{2}V_{0}^{2}[/tex]


For this question, I applied the same method as part a but I (again) didn't have the acceleration so I was trying to use a kinematic equation to solve it but all of the equations have to have the value for initial speed, which is what I am solving for. The correct answer for this part is 58km/h.

Please help! I'm lost!:cry:
 
Last edited:
aquamarine08 said:
At first, I didn't have the acceleration but I used a kinematic equation for figure it out:

[tex]d_{1}[/tex]=[tex]d_{0}[/tex]+[tex]V_{0}[/tex]t+[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]a[tex]t^{2}[/tex]

60= 0+90+[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]a
30=90+a
-60 m/[tex]s^{2}[/tex]=a

The negative made sense to me since the car was slowing down and then I used this to find the distance.
You can't use that particular kinematic equation to find the acceleration, since you don't have the time. But you don't need to find the acceleration.

w=[tex]\Delta[/tex]k
Fd=[tex]\Delta[/tex]([tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]m[tex]v^{2}[/tex])
This is all you need. Now make use of the fact that the friction force (F) and the mass (m) are constant. Hint: That tells you that stopping distance (d) is proportional to [itex]\Delta v^2[/itex].

Putting all the constants to one side:

[tex]\frac{2F}{m} = \frac{\Delta v^2}{d}[/tex]

You can use that constant ratio to solve all parts of this problem.
 
sorry for being so annoying... what i understood from your last post was that since F and m are constant, they don't have to included in the equation so after solving the ratio...

[tex]\frac{2F}{m}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{[tex]\Delta[/tex][tex]v^{2}[/tex]}{d}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{2}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{-90^{2}}{d}[/tex]

2= [tex]\frac{-8100}{d}[/tex]

-4050 km= d

-4.05 m= d

am i doing something wrong?? (i surely am...but could you explain some more... thank you SO much! )
 
Since this is constant:

[tex]\frac{2F}{m} = \frac{\Delta v^2}{d}[/tex]

You can set up the ratio like this:

[tex]\frac{(\Delta v^2)_1}{d_1} = \frac{(\Delta v^2)_2}{d_2}[/tex]

Using the first set of data gives you:

[tex]\frac{(\Delta v^2)_1}{d_1} = \frac{(45 km/h)^2}{(60 m)}[/tex]

The second set of data gives you:

[tex]\frac{(\Delta v^2)_2}{d_2} = \frac{(90 km/h)^2}{(d_2)}[/tex]

Set those ratios equal and solve for [itex]d_2[/itex].
 
Last edited:
  • #10
alright...thanks a lot for all your help! :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K