Antenna Resistance: Complex Implications in Real Life

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Seanskahn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antenna Resistance
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the complex nature of antenna impedance as described in the book "Antennas" by Kraus and Marhefka. The impedance is represented as Z = R + jX, where R is resistance and X is reactance. The complex part of impedance indicates the phase shift between voltage and current, which is crucial for understanding oscillating currents at a frequency ω. The use of complex notation simplifies calculations in circuit analysis, allowing for efficient manipulation of voltage and current relationships.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their representation in electrical engineering.
  • Familiarity with Ohm's Law and its application in AC circuits.
  • Knowledge of oscillating current and its mathematical representation.
  • Basic concepts of impedance in electrical circuits.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of complex impedance in AC circuit analysis.
  • Learn about the role of phase shift in electrical engineering applications.
  • Explore the mathematical foundations of complex numbers in circuit theory.
  • Investigate advanced techniques for simplifying circuit calculations using phasors.
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, students studying circuit theory, and professionals working with antenna design and analysis will benefit from this discussion.

Seanskahn
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hello community

Sorry if this is a repost, but I don't find what i am looking for.

I am reading the book "anntenas", by Kraus and Marhefka

In page 30, says the antenna impedances are complex. Z{\tau} = +
R{\tau} + jX{\tau} ..

Could anyone please tell me what does the complex part imply in real life, and why is it regarded as complex.
Thank you

edit: the tau is supposed to be subscripted, but it is appearing as superscript :s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Impedance is used with complex notation for oscillation current. Suppose you have current oscillation at frequency ω and amplitude I0. Then the current is given by:

I = Re(I_0 e^{i \omega t}) = I_0 cos(\omega t)

The complex voltage is related to complex current using analog of Ohm's law.

V = Re(Z I_0 e^{i \omega t})

If Z is real, this is no different from Ohm's Law. But let's substitute your complex form in.

V = Re((R + iX) I_0 e^{i \omega t})

V = I_0 Re(R e^{i \omega t} + X e^{i (\omega t + \frac{\pi}{2})})

V = I_0 R cos(\omega t) - I_0 X sin(\omega t)

The first term is still just IR, but second term is phase-shifted by 90°. This expression can also be re-written using a single cosine function.

V = I_0 \sqrt{R^2 + X^2} cos(\omega t + \tan^{-1}(\frac{X}{R}))

In other words, the norm of Z gives you the ratio of peak voltage to peak current, and so plays a role of effective resistance, while the angle of Z in complex plane gives you the phase shift between voltage and current.
 
hi K2

Thanks you for the reply

then let me ask the next obvious question.
why don't we then just use any 2 dimensional plane for the Z vector?

etheta is still sin(theta) + cos(theta), albeit the sin and cos part is summed, and not distinguishable
 
Because then you can't write V = ZI. Multiplication is not defined in vector spaces, but is defined in complex space.

It's just a convenience, though. You can solve any circuit using ordinary voltage and current by breaking up each into sin and cos components. It just gets a little messy. Once you know a few tricks, working with impedances is very fast.
 
hi K2

thank you very much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
947
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
503K