Anti-commutation of parity operator

  • Thread starter Thread starter sydfloyd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator Parity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves the parity operator and its anti-commutation with the momentum operator in quantum mechanics. The original poster seeks to demonstrate that the parity operator \( P \) and the momentum operator \( p_x \) anti-commute, specifically that \( \{ P, p_x \} = 0 \).

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to manipulate the expression \( \{ P, p_x \} \psi(x) \) to show it equals zero, questioning the validity of their steps regarding the application of the parity operator on derivatives.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the validity of the original poster's reasoning, with one participant suggesting a partial agreement and another noting the need for confirmation from others.
  • There are repeated assertions about the transformation properties of the parity operator, particularly regarding how it affects functions of \( x \) and derivatives.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the implications of the parity operator's action on derivatives. Some guidance has been offered regarding the transformation properties, but there is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the original poster's reasoning.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can share or the conclusions they can draw. There is an emphasis on verifying assumptions and interpretations of the operators involved.

sydfloyd
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The parity operator is defined as [tex]P \psi (x) = \psi (-x)[/tex]. Show that [tex]P[/tex] and [tex]p_x[/tex] anti-commute, that is, [tex]\{ P,p_x \} = Pp_x + p_xP = 0[/tex].


Homework Equations


[tex]P \psi (x) = \psi (-x)[/tex]
[tex]p_x = - i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution


[tex]\{ P,p_x \} \psi(x) = ( Pp_x + p_xP ) \psi(x) = -i \hbar \left[ P \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \psi (x) + \frac{\partial}{\partial x} [ P \psi (x) ]\right] = -i \hbar \left[ \frac{\partial}{\partial (-x)} \psi (-x) + \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \psi (-x) \right] = -i \hbar \left[ - \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \psi (-x) + \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \psi (-x) \right] = 0[/tex]

Is it valid to say that [tex]P \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \psi (x) = \frac{\partial}{\partial (-x)} \psi (-x)[/tex] ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
for the part where you found (pxP) this one is correct ..

as for your question, I won't say that I am 100% sure that it is valid .. but I would say that I am 80% agree with what you suggested in order to get your answer ..

what I know about the parity operator is that when you apply it on psi(x) you get psi(-x), so whenever you have x you simply change it to -x and vice versa (that would be applied to other things such as velocity and force) ..
 
I'm under the impression that the parity operator transforms [tex]x \rightarrow -x[/tex].

Let's say that [tex]f(x) = \frac{\partial \psi (x) }{\partial x}[/tex] .

Then [tex]P f(x) = f(-x) = \frac{\partial \psi (-x) }{\partial (-x)} = - \frac{\partial \psi (-x) }{\partial x}[/tex] , right?

I feel that something is wrong here.
 
sydfloyd said:
I'm under the impression that the parity operator transforms [tex]x \rightarrow -x[/tex].

Let's say that [tex]f(x) = \frac{\partial \psi (x) }{\partial x}[/tex] .

Then [tex]P f(x) = f(-x) = \frac{\partial \psi (-x) }{\partial (-x)} = - \frac{\partial \psi (-x) }{\partial x}[/tex] , right?

I feel that something is wrong here.

I told you I am not 100% sure .. but i still think it is right the way you did ..

hopefully there would be someone else to confirm what I think ..
 
sydfloyd said:
I'm under the impression that the parity operator transforms [tex]x \rightarrow -x[/tex].

Let's say that [tex]f(x) = \frac{\partial \psi (x) }{\partial x}[/tex] .

Then [tex]P f(x) = f(-x) = \frac{\partial \psi (-x) }{\partial (-x)} = - \frac{\partial \psi (-x) }{\partial x}[/tex] , right?
Right. I don't see anything wrong. Use a trial function of x, like a few terms of a polynomial, that doesn't have definite parity and see how it works.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
687
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K