Anti-Gravity Logistics: Pinned to Planet or Beyond?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of an object losing its gravitational force and its subsequent behavior in relation to Earth and the Sun. Participants assert that without gravity, an object would continue in a straight line, influenced by its initial velocity and the rotation of the Earth. They reference the concept of cavorite from H.G. Wells' "First Men on the Moon," which illustrates fictional anti-gravity effects but also highlights misconceptions about gravity's nature. The consensus emphasizes that gravity is a fundamental force, and any hypothetical scenarios involving its absence must consider the laws of physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newtonian physics and gravitational forces
  • Familiarity with the concept of reference frames in physics
  • Knowledge of fundamental forces in physics, including gravity, electromagnetism, and buoyancy
  • Awareness of science fiction concepts, particularly anti-gravity theories
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of Newton's laws of motion and their application to gravitational forces
  • Explore the concept of reference frames in classical mechanics
  • Investigate the role of buoyancy in fluid dynamics and its effects on objects in a gravitational field
  • Read H.G. Wells' "First Men on the Moon" to understand fictional representations of anti-gravity
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, science fiction enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the theoretical implications of gravity and its absence in real-world scenarios.

Frost Dragon
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
If an object was to lose its gravity for any reason, would it lose its reference frame to the planet and sun. Therefore keep going in a straight line? Or is there some other force that would keep it pinned to the planet. Also does this have any application to sci-fi anti gravity would it also fly off the planet?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Frost Dragon said:
If an object was to lose its gravity for any reason, would it lose its reference frame to the planet and sun. Therefore keep going in a straight line? Or is there some other force that would keep it pinned to the planet. Also does this have any application to sci-fi anti gravity would it also fly off the planet?
Your question amounts to "if the laws of physics did not apply then what would the laws of physics say about <insert nonsense of your choice>?"
 
Basically, "no". Of course, there are problems with having a non-positive gravity, and therefore a non-positive mass.
But if we ignore those problems, we still have an object is a normal Sun/Moon/Earth gravitational field that will "fall" in the normal way.

However, having zero rest mass and being at rest, it would not exert a gravitatoinal force on anything else.
 
Ok thanks, I think that helps me.
 
Frost Dragon said:
If an object was to lose its gravity for any reason
It's not a very fruitful approach to learning about Physics of you start off with a statement about Magic.
 
Frost Dragon said:
If an object was to lose its gravity for any reason, would it lose its reference frame to the planet and sun. Therefore keep going in a straight line? Or is there some other force that would keep it pinned to the planet. Also does this have any application to sci-fi anti gravity would it also fly off the planet?

Well, there are still 3 other fundamental forces that apply. You could simply tether the object to the ground if you wanted to. Of course, that assumes that the object just ignores gravity, not that it is repelled by it.
 
It's like asking if time didn't exist, would anything happen?
Time does exist though, and so does gravity.
 
Cavor explained it in First Men on the Moon. Yes, an object that loses its gravity would fly off the Earth in a straight line following Earth rotation... unless additional forces apply, like buoyancy of air causing it to rise even faster.
A problem is that cavorite blocked gravity in straight line. In First Men on the Moon, this caused a house containing a cavorite sheet to blow up as the whole air column above lost weight. Well, that was an error... centre of Earth is not actually a point mass.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
885
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K