How Does Mining Affect the Gravity of a Hollowed-Out Planet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Khatti
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Gravity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the effects of mining on the gravity of a hollowed-out, earth-sized planet that has been extensively mined, particularly focusing on the implications of removing a significant portion of its mass from the core. Participants consider theoretical models and assumptions regarding gravity, structural integrity, and the physical consequences of such mining activities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario where a sixth of the planet's mass has been removed, questioning how this would affect gravity.
  • Another participant references Gauss's law, suggesting that if the tunnels are evenly dispersed and the planet remains radially symmetric, gravity would be proportional to the radial distance from the core, leading to a zero net gravitational force within the hollow core.
  • A different viewpoint posits that while gravity would decrease due to the mass removal, the relationship is not straightforward, as the planet's radius would also change, complicating the calculation of gravity reduction.
  • Concerns are raised about the structural integrity of the planet, with some suggesting that uneven mass distribution could lead to collapse and surface devastation, rather than a uniform hollowing out.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the density profile and internal pressure would significantly influence the planet's behavior, indicating that a "swiss-cheese" structure might be unrealistic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of mass removal on gravity, with some suggesting a straightforward reduction while others argue for a more complex relationship involving structural changes and density profiles. No consensus is reached on the exact effects or the feasibility of the hollowed-out structure.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about uniform density, the distribution of tunnels, and the structural integrity of the planet, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

Khatti
Messages
281
Reaction score
35
I'm working on a planet that is earth-sized, but has been essentially a dead stone for millions of years: no volcanic activity, the core has completely cooled down, the atmosphere has long since drifted off. In turn it has been mined for so long that a sixth of its mass has been dug up and shipped off. Much of that mass has actually come from the core. Does anyone have any thoughts how hollowing out an earth-sized planet would effect its gravity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks to Gauss's law...

Assuming these tunnels are more or less evenly dispersed throughout the planet, and assuming that the planet is more or less uniformly dense, then the force due to gravity is proportional to the radial distance from the core.

If the core is hollowed out, but the the rest of the planet is more or less still radially symmetric, then throughout the hollow core, the net gravitational force will be zero, and you'll be able to float throughout the hollowed core (assuming the mass of air in the core is negligible).
 
Khatti said:
I'm working on a planet that is earth-sized, but has been essentially a dead stone for millions of years: no volcanic activity, the core has completely cooled down, the atmosphere has long since drifted off. In turn it has been mined for so long that a sixth of its mass has been dug up and shipped off. Much of that mass has actually come from the core. Does anyone have any thoughts how hollowing out an earth-sized planet would effect its gravity?
simple, since a sixth of the mass has been removed, and from the core, the gravity at the surface will be reduced by a sixth.
 
It is highly unlikely that the cored planet would remain structurally intact, unless the coring is perfectly distributed as @jfizzix notes. But more likely, slight mass unbalances would cause it to collapse in parts, with obvious devastation to the surface as thousands of kms of depth subside. This is going to take some time, and will likely be in parts, not all at once. It will eventually be pretty much spherical, with some massive craters that remain because there is no continental shift to recycle the mantle and no air to erode the surface features.

It's gravity would decrease, obviously, but because the radius would as well, it might not be as straightforward as being exactly one sixth less as @greswd notes, but that's probably close enough.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Khatti
Tghu Verd said:
It is highly unlikely that the cored planet would remain structurally intact, unless the coring is perfectly distributed as @jfizzix notes. But more likely, slight mass unbalances would cause it to collapse in parts, with obvious devastation to the surface as thousands of kms of depth subside. This is going to take some time, and will likely be in parts, not all at once. It will eventually be pretty much spherical, with some massive craters that remain because there is no continental shift to recycle the mantle and no air to erode the surface features.

It's gravity would decrease, obviously, but because the radius would as well, it might not be as straightforward as being exactly one sixth less as @greswd notes, but that's probably close enough.
yeah, it would actually shrink a lot, and the size would depend on the density profile, which itself is dependent on the internal pressure, which is dependent on the internal gravitational field, and which is dependent on the density profile!

it'll also depend on the strength of the planet's composition. Realistically a swiss-cheese planet would be super unlikely to be possible.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K