Anti-reflective coating optimum index of refraction

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The optimum index of refraction for an anti-reflective coating on glass is determined by the equation n1 = sqrt(n0 * ns), where n1 is the coating's index, n0 is the index of air, and ns is the index of glass. This relationship aims to achieve zero reflection at normal incidence. However, users have reported difficulties in deriving this equation mathematically, with some sources indicating that the condition n0 = ns is necessary for achieving zero reflection. The textbook "Optics" by Hecht provides a complex derivation on page 375, which may not be easily applicable to simplified scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of optical physics principles
  • Familiarity with indices of refraction
  • Basic mathematical skills for manipulating equations
  • Access to "Optics" by Hecht for reference
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the anti-reflective coating formula in "Optics" by Hecht
  • Research the effects of angle of incidence on reflection and refraction
  • Explore practical applications of anti-reflective coatings in optics
  • Learn about different materials and their indices of refraction for coatings
USEFUL FOR

Optical engineers, physicists, and students studying optics who are interested in anti-reflective coating applications and their mathematical foundations.

reb30
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello

I'm trying to solve a problem where I'm asked to find the optimum index of refraction for an antireflective coating on a piece of glass. In trying to derive an equation for it I keep coming across this in the internet (where 1,0, and s should be subscripts)

n1=sqrt(n0ns)

where n1 is the index of refraction of the coating, n0 is that of the air, and ns is the glass (see here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antireflection_coating) . I can't work out how this was derived for the life of me and can't find it anywhere in books or the internet. Does anyone have any ideas?

Thanks a lot

Robert
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I also have found this near impossible, despite spending hours working on it. My books quote that the relation given above should give zero reflection, but the only way I can make that happen is if n0 = ns.

I understand theoretically how and why this should work, I just can't get it to work mathematically..
 
@reb30:

I don't know if you own a copy of the textbook "Optics" by Hecht's but there's a derivation on page 375. Unfortuanatly it's very complicated and is done for general angle of incidence, rather than normal incidence. I couldn't make it work for simplified start conditions..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K