Antiparticles vs virtual particles

In summary: They have a positive charge and can only transport positive energy. If you have a bunch of them in a room, they will all repel each other and the room will be negative energy. But if you put them in a container, they will all collect together and the container will be positive energy.
  • #1
sadeghi94
2
0
Im a grade 12 student and I just started reading black holes aint so black in the brief history of time. However, I'm having a hard time distinguishing a difference between these two particles. What is a difference?
thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'm not exactly confidant on all matters concerning this subject, but I do know that if two particles; one of virtual and one of anti matter, they would each be destroyed in a release of cosmic energy. Also an item (like a space ship) made of anti matter could exist in the vacuum of space, only as long as it doesn't come in contact with any virtual particles.
 
  • #3
Virtual particles have a formal meaning to quantum field experts (though they debate what that meaning ought to be), of which I am not one, but it sounds like you are interested in a much more informal meaning of the term, as appears in some explanations of Hawking radiation. Antiparticles are real particles, established in the laboratory, that have positive energy (despite the "anti"), so can only transport positive energy from place to place. But the energy of virtual particles does not show up in the final tally at the end of whatever process is under study, because virtual particles are never there at the end, so they can transport negative energy (temporarily). So if an object gains energy, we can say it absorbed a virtual particle that gave it positive energy, or we can say it sent out a virtual particle that contained negative energy, so long as that virtual particle is not still around at the end (so it must give up that negative energy to something real that ends up with less positive energy). That's the picture used in Hawking radiation-- two virtual particles are produced (generally virtual photons), and one goes out and becomes a real photon with positive energy, and the other transports negative energy into the black hole before it blinks out of existence. It doesn't matter which is the particle and which is the antiparticle-- it could be either. What matters is that the particle that comes out must turn into a real particle, so must have positive energy, but the one that goes in is lost into the black hole, so it does not need to become a real particle and can transport the negative energy that allows the energy budget to work out when its entangled pair particle becomes real.

I should also mention that few experts hold that this is a formally correct explanation of Hawking radiation-- it is more like a useful picture of uncertain reliability that is thought to be more suitable than giving a bunch of detailed equations.
 
  • #4
Virtual particles are the effect of quantum theory being applied to the vacuum. They pop into and out of existence in pairs, so there is no change in conservation laws. They may be a particle antiparticle pair or a pair of photons.

Antiparticles are real. The most common in ordinary usage are in PET scanners.
 

What are antiparticles?

Antiparticles are particles that have the same mass and spin as their corresponding particles, but have opposite electric charge and other quantum numbers. They are the mirror image of their corresponding particles and can be created in high-energy collisions.

What are virtual particles?

Virtual particles are particles that exist for a very short amount of time, typically on the order of 10^-24 seconds. They are constantly popping in and out of existence due to the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics. They cannot be directly observed, but their effects can be measured.

How are antiparticles and virtual particles different?

Antiparticles and virtual particles are fundamentally different in that antiparticles have a corresponding real particle with opposite properties, while virtual particles do not have a corresponding real particle. Additionally, antiparticles can be created and detected in high-energy collisions, while virtual particles cannot be directly observed.

Do antiparticles and virtual particles have any practical applications?

Antiparticles have practical applications in medical imaging (such as in PET scans) and in particle accelerators for high-energy experiments. Virtual particles are important in understanding and predicting the behavior of particles in quantum field theory, but they do not have any direct practical applications.

Are antiparticles and virtual particles related in any way?

Antiparticles and virtual particles are related in that they both exist as a result of quantum mechanics and they both have opposite properties to their corresponding particles. However, they are fundamentally different in terms of their existence and applications.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
878
Replies
21
Views
2K
Back
Top