Undergrad Antipodal points and temperature and other angles

  • Thread starter Thread starter srfriggen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles Temperature
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical concept that two antipodal points on Earth can have the same temperature at any given moment, as demonstrated through the Borsuk-Ulam Theorem. This theorem asserts that for any continuous function mapping from an n-sphere to real numbers, there exists a point where the function values at antipodal points are equal. The conversation explores extending this idea to points separated by different angles, such as 90 degrees, and discusses the implications of periodic functions in proving these results. The participants confirm that the original problem can be generalized and that the proof for angles other than 180 degrees is straightforward.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Borsuk-Ulam Theorem
  • Familiarity with continuous functions and periodic functions
  • Basic knowledge of spherical geometry
  • Proficiency in mathematical proof techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Borsuk-Ulam Theorem and its applications in topology
  • Explore periodic functions and their properties in mathematical analysis
  • Investigate the implications of antipodal points in various mathematical contexts
  • Study graphical methods for visualizing temperature distributions on spherical surfaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics educators, students studying topology, researchers in mathematical analysis, and anyone interested in the applications of the Borsuk-Ulam Theorem in real-world scenarios.

srfriggen
Messages
304
Reaction score
7
TL;DR
Can this popular problem be generalized to all angles?
Hello,

I am a high school math teacher and recently presented my students with an intriguing problem: "At any given moment, there are two antipodal points on Earth (180 degrees apart) that have the same temperature." This can be demonstrated using one great circle with two opposite points. If we assume they begin at differing temperatures and rotate them around the circle at the same rate, they will have encountered all intermediate temperatures by the time they've completed 180 degrees. Since they remain 180 degrees apart and the temperature changes continuously, they will have identical temperatures simultaneously at least once.

One of my students proposed extending this idea to points separated by different angles, such as 90 degrees, using a graphical approach, and it appears to be valid. I'm curious if this is a known extension or if anyone has explored similar generalizations.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, a stronger result than your original can be proved. The Borsuk-Ulam Theorem says that if ##f: S^n\to \Bbb R^n## (where ##S^n## is the ##n##-sphere) is a continuous map, then there exists a point ##x\in S^n## such that ##f(-x)=f(x)##. In the case ##n=2##, an example is that at any given moment, there are two antipodal points on Earth that have not just the same temperature, but at the same time the same air pressure, provided that temperature and air pressure vary continuously on the Earth's surface.

For your original problem, the theorem (for ##n=1##) implies that the conclusion (about temperature only) holds when restricted to any great circle on the Earth. As you noted, this is simple to prove. It is much harder to prove the theorem for ##n=2## and in general.

I don't know if the result (for ##n=1##) for other angles than 180 degrees has been studied. But it is easy to prove that this is true. The simplest is to extend the function to a periodic function (going several laps around the circle):

Claim: Let ##f:\Bbb R\to \Bbb R## be a continuous periodic function, with period ##2\pi## (so that ##f(x+2\pi)=f(x)##, for all ##x\in \Bbb R##).
Then, for every ##a\in \Bbb R##, there is an ##x\in [0,2\pi]## such that ##f(x+a)=f(x)##.

Proof: ##f(x)## attains its maximum at some ##c\in[0,2\pi]##. Because of the periodicity, ##f(c)## is the maximum of ##f(x)## on all of ##\Bbb R##.
Put ##g(x)=f(x+a)-f(a)##. Then ##g(c-a)=f(c)-f(c-a)\ge 0## and ##g(c)=f(c+a)-f(c)\le 0##. Since ##g## is continuous on ##[c-a,c]##, the Intermediate Value Theorem gives an ##x\in [c-a,c]## such that ##g(x)=0##. Hence, ##f(x+a)=f(x)##, so such an ##x## exists, Q. E. D.
 
Typo, I think:
Erland said:
g(x)=f(x+a)−f(a).
meant to say ##g(x)=f(x+a)-f(x)##.
 
Hill said:
Typo, I think:

meant to say ##g(x)=f(x+a)-f(x)##.
Yes of course. Thank you and sorry for the mistake!
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K