I Antipodal points and temperature and other angles

  • Thread starter Thread starter srfriggen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles Temperature
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the concept that antipodal points on Earth can have the same temperature at any moment, a principle illustrated using a great circle. This idea is supported by the Borsuk-Ulam Theorem, which states that continuous functions on a sphere will have points that are equal at antipodal locations, extending to other variables like air pressure. A student proposed exploring similar properties for points separated by angles other than 180 degrees, which appears to hold validity. The conversation also touches on proving these concepts through periodic functions and the Intermediate Value Theorem. Overall, the discussion highlights intriguing mathematical relationships between temperature, pressure, and spatial geometry on Earth.
srfriggen
Messages
304
Reaction score
7
TL;DR
Can this popular problem be generalized to all angles?
Hello,

I am a high school math teacher and recently presented my students with an intriguing problem: "At any given moment, there are two antipodal points on Earth (180 degrees apart) that have the same temperature." This can be demonstrated using one great circle with two opposite points. If we assume they begin at differing temperatures and rotate them around the circle at the same rate, they will have encountered all intermediate temperatures by the time they've completed 180 degrees. Since they remain 180 degrees apart and the temperature changes continuously, they will have identical temperatures simultaneously at least once.

One of my students proposed extending this idea to points separated by different angles, such as 90 degrees, using a graphical approach, and it appears to be valid. I'm curious if this is a known extension or if anyone has explored similar generalizations.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, a stronger result than your original can be proved. The Borsuk-Ulam Theorem says that if ##f: S^n\to \Bbb R^n## (where ##S^n## is the ##n##-sphere) is a continuous map, then there exists a point ##x\in S^n## such that ##f(-x)=f(x)##. In the case ##n=2##, an example is that at any given moment, there are two antipodal points on Earth that have not just the same temperature, but at the same time the same air pressure, provided that temperature and air pressure vary continuously on the Earth's surface.

For your original problem, the theorem (for ##n=1##) implies that the conclusion (about temperature only) holds when restricted to any great circle on the Earth. As you noted, this is simple to prove. It is much harder to prove the theorem for ##n=2## and in general.

I don't know if the result (for ##n=1##) for other angles than 180 degrees has been studied. But it is easy to prove that this is true. The simplest is to extend the function to a periodic function (going several laps around the circle):

Claim: Let ##f:\Bbb R\to \Bbb R## be a continuous periodic function, with period ##2\pi## (so that ##f(x+2\pi)=f(x)##, for all ##x\in \Bbb R##).
Then, for every ##a\in \Bbb R##, there is an ##x\in [0,2\pi]## such that ##f(x+a)=f(x)##.

Proof: ##f(x)## attains its maximum at some ##c\in[0,2\pi]##. Because of the periodicity, ##f(c)## is the maximum of ##f(x)## on all of ##\Bbb R##.
Put ##g(x)=f(x+a)-f(a)##. Then ##g(c-a)=f(c)-f(c-a)\ge 0## and ##g(c)=f(c+a)-f(c)\le 0##. Since ##g## is continuous on ##[c-a,c]##, the Intermediate Value Theorem gives an ##x\in [c-a,c]## such that ##g(x)=0##. Hence, ##f(x+a)=f(x)##, so such an ##x## exists, Q. E. D.
 
Typo, I think:
Erland said:
g(x)=f(x+a)−f(a).
meant to say ##g(x)=f(x+a)-f(x)##.
 
Hill said:
Typo, I think:

meant to say ##g(x)=f(x+a)-f(x)##.
Yes of course. Thank you and sorry for the mistake!
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K