Any Good Resources for Non-Technical, Non- Popular Physics Videos?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the search for physics videos that are accessible yet not overly simplistic or filled with misleading metaphors. The original poster expresses admiration for Richard Feynman's lectures, which effectively communicate complex ideas without resorting to technical jargon or trivial comparisons. Participants acknowledge the challenge of finding resources that strike a balance between technical depth and layperson accessibility. There is a consensus that true understanding can be conveyed without requiring advanced mathematical knowledge. The thread concludes with an emphasis on the importance of clear explanations for intelligent, non-technical audiences.
RJMooreII
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Any Good Resources for Non-Technical, Non-"Popular" Physics Videos?

I am a huge fan of Richard Feynman, because he would often give lectures which were not directed at a technical-mathematical audience yet which nonetheless didn't 'fake' elements or resort to goofy comparisons such as billiard balls and so forth. Yet I find it is quite difficult to locate any other video lectures that replicate that same sort of 'cusp' level of explanations, there are plenty of lectures on the technical aspects which I simply do not have the training to follow; but the majority of videos aimed at laypersons always seem to make extremely false metaphors like comparing string theories to literal vibrations or using every topic of quantum physics as an excuse to bring up alternate dimensions (and no, not the nuclear voids or other possible uninhabitable universes, always ones where you have nine toes, etc).

Does anyone know what I mean? I want something aimed at something other than the general television audience, but which doesn't require calculus to follow.

Thanks, Ricky.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Mathematics is really the only way to appreciate what something actually means.
 


Kevin_Axion said:
Mathematics is really the only way to appreciate what something actually means.

X2

There is no such thing as ""Non technical and Non popular science":cool:
 


RJmooreII, I understand what you mean. And I believe its possible to explain things like you said.
Actually true understanding of principles doesn't mean being able to Integrate an expression and arrive at the other; Only the best can explain it flawlessly to the Non-technical but intelligent people (like yourself)

Cheers:
I hope that , it helped. :)
 
I'm not a student or graduate in Astrophysics.. Wish i were though... I was playing with distances between planets... I found that Mars, Ceres, Jupiter and Saturn have somthing in common... They are in a kind of ratio with another.. They all got a difference about 1,84 to 1,88x the distance from the previous planet, sub-planet. On average 1,845x. I thought this can be coincidential. So i took the big moons of Jupiter and Saturn to do the same thing jupiter; Io, Europa and Ganymede have a...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K