Anyone remember how to solve 0^0?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kings_gambit
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The expression 0^0 is often left undefined in basic mathematics, but under specific conditions, it can be defined as 1. This conclusion arises from evaluating the limit of x^x as x approaches 0 from the positive side, which simplifies to e^(x log x) and ultimately converges to e^0, equating to 1. It is crucial to note that this function is not defined for negative real numbers unless one delves into multivalued complex functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and logarithms
  • Basic knowledge of real and complex number systems
  • Concept of continuity and undefined expressions in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of limits in calculus, specifically focusing on indeterminate forms
  • Study the properties of exponential functions and their behavior near zero
  • Explore the implications of defining functions over complex numbers
  • Investigate the historical context and mathematical debates surrounding 0^0
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus, educators teaching mathematical concepts, and anyone interested in the nuances of mathematical definitions and limits.

kings_gambit
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I remember it was 'one', but it's been a while...basically we want to find

lim (as x-->0) of (x^x), or not? Any takers?

Cheers,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kings_gambit said:
I remember it was 'one', but it's been a while...basically we want to find

lim (as x-->0) of (x^x), or not? Any takers?

Cheers,


There's nothing "to solve". This is a problematic expression which in basic maths is almost always left undefined, and

sometimes, under some usually rather astringent conditions, it is defined as 1 because certainly
[tex]x^x=e^{x\log x}\xrightarrow [x\to 0^+]{} e^0=1[/tex]

Play attention to the fact the function isn't defined over the negative reals, unless you'd be wishing to get into multivalued complex functions and stuff.

DonAntonio
 
Please read https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=530207
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K