Anyone thought of combining solar water heater with Stirling generator?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential integration of solar water heating systems with Stirling engines to generate electricity. Participants explore the efficiency of solar water heaters, the mechanics of Stirling engines, and the feasibility of combining these technologies for energy production, particularly in the context of renewable energy applications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that solar water heating is highly efficient, converting nearly all solar radiation into heat, while Stirling engines also exhibit efficiency but are not as effective as solar water heaters.
  • One participant mentions existing experimental sites using concentrating solar arrays with vapor compression cycles and steam turbines, suggesting they are efficient but limited in operation after sunset.
  • Another participant asserts that while it is possible to combine these technologies, the power output may be low due to the low power-to-surface area ratio of sunlight and the specific power limitations of Stirling engines.
  • A participant shares personal experience with a Stirling engine, indicating that while it can operate with high-temperature water, the energy output is minimal compared to solar panels, which are more effective and cost-efficient in the long run.
  • Questions arise about the definition of specific power, with some clarification provided regarding its meaning in relation to physical size and mass.
  • Several links to external resources and products related to solar technology and Stirling engines are shared, indicating interest in further exploration of these technologies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the feasibility and efficiency of combining solar water heaters with Stirling engines. While some affirm the possibility of such integration, others highlight significant limitations and challenges, leading to an unresolved discussion on the practicality of the concept.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific conditions such as sunlight intensity, the efficiency of the Stirling engine, and the potential energy losses in mechanical transmission. The discussion does not resolve these technical uncertainties.

Ulysees
Messages
515
Reaction score
0
I've heard that solar water heating is very efficient, almost all the radiation of the sun on the panel is turned into heat.

Also heard Stirling cycle generators (where heat flow from hot to cold is turned into mechanical motion and hence into electricity) are also quite efficient. Though by no means as efficient as solar water heaters.

So what happens if you put the two together to produce electricity? You could use the stored hot water in the night too. It must be quite low-cost, certainly the solar panels and water tanks are mass-produced already, the cost is in the Stirling engine.

Anyone thought about this?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Although it isn't exactly like what you describe there are some experimental sites across the world, a couple in the Western deserts, that use the following concentrating solar arrays.

http://www.nrel.gov/csp/"

They generally run in a vapor compression cycle (a form of a Rankine cycle), however, and use steam turbines to capture the energy and convert it to mechanical work.

Everything I have read says that they work pretty well and are quite efficient but can only run a couple of hours after the sun has set. As far as the use of the Stirling engine I cannot comment.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Also, check this out:
http://www.tfot.info/news/1101/the-rise-of-the-solar-tower.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It certainly works. You just don't get very much power out of it, due to the relatively low power/surface area ratio of incident sunlight, and the low specific power of a Sterling engine.
 
Can you just remind me what specific power is? Output power per kg of mass or something?
 
I meant power relative to physical size, but your definition is better. :smile:
 
Check this out

This will provide 3 KW of electric power in bright sunlight plus all the hot water you need.

http://www.infiniacorp.com/applications/Prod_Spec.pdf


Hubert
 
You can also visit http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~artin and take a look at Artin Der Minassians' dissertation and publications.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It sure is possible
you can get motion out of a flate plate collector i used a flate plate collector + LTD stirling engine, it runs. Check it out on video google under solar engine or link to
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6257236920067550362
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Sounds like a good idea, but here is my experience:

My father has a stirling engine, I made an experiment with this stuff back in high school. The water was really hot, like 90°C almost. Even the striling started to move, the real turn was when the motor was exposed to direct flame. And with the loss of energy of the mechanical transmission from the stirling engine to a generator the current that could be obtained was minimal.

I compared this result later when I was working with alarm systems using solar panels. Using a solar panel is more effective and cheaper in the long run compared to what can be obtained of the solar panel. And as you can consider using batteries you can use the obtained energy anytimne you want to. I don't know if now a more efficient stirling engine can be obtained to compare with what's available nowadays.
 
  • #11
Where can one acquire a large sterling engine or an engine using the same concepts (a waste heat engine)? I am interested in focusing large/many fresnel lenses and using the heat from the focused beams into electricity and work.

Here is a cool company but I cannot seem to find out if any of their products are for sale. http://cyclonepower.com/waste_heat_engine.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K