Is an Internship the Right Path for Grad School in Applied Physics?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the pathways to graduate education in applied physics and the potential role of internships in that journey. Participants explore the implications of pursuing a Master's versus a Ph.D., the definitions of applied physics, and the relationship between physics and engineering.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses excitement about the possibility of internships as a path to applied physics, suggesting a preference for practical experience over traditional academic routes.
  • Another participant questions the advisor's assertion, noting that applied physics can encompass academic research and Ph.D. programs, highlighting the ambiguity of the term "applied physics."
  • A participant emphasizes the distinction between pursuing a Master's and a Ph.D., indicating that the latter may involve more academic research rather than solely internships.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for "pushing paper" in a career, with a desire for hands-on work and practical applications of physics.
  • Some participants suggest that the interests expressed may align more closely with engineering rather than pure physics, prompting a discussion about the appropriateness of majoring in engineering physics.
  • There is uncertainty regarding the best field to pursue, with a participant seeking literature to better understand career options in physics and engineering.
  • One participant confirms that it is possible to pursue a Master's in Engineering after obtaining a B.S. in Physics.
  • Suggestions are made to consider transferring to a school that offers an engineering physics program or to create a special degree program with an advisor.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best path forward, with multiple competing views on the relationship between applied physics and engineering, as well as the role of internships in graduate education.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of applied physics and engineering, as well as the specific offerings at different universities. Participants express varying degrees of uncertainty about their career paths and the implications of their educational choices.

Poop-Loops
Messages
732
Reaction score
1
I just transferred over to a university (UW) and my advisor said that if I am planning on going into applied physics after my B.S., my grad school will probably just be an intership or something like that.

Is that right? That would be pretty awesome. I have a short attention span, so going out and actually doing something would be a lot cooler than staying in school.

Unless it's pushing paper.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hm. I'm not sure if I necessarily buy that. If you're interested in doing engineering ("physics that is applied"), then yes, I suppose an internship may be the next step in your career just as grad school would be the next step in the career of somebody interested in going to academia.

However, there are Applied Physics departments at universities that do academic research. ("Applied Physics" is something of a nebulous term to me in this context though.) I.e. if you're interested in doing a PhD and becoming a professor or researcher in the field, then there are Applied Physics (AP) gradaute programs out there (at Stanford for example).

So don't misunderstand what your advisor is telling you and assume that an internship after undergrad in physics-y engineering is the same as a PhD program in Applied Physics. This isn't to say that one path is preferable over the other--that's something that you should decide on your own based on what intersts you.

As a side note, there is a graduate fellowship from the National Physical Science Consortium that works very closely with industry. It funds a graduate student's PhD research while they spend summers working in industry (essentially doing internships). The website is: http://www.npsc.org/"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Poop-Loops said:
I just transferred over to a university (UW) and my advisor said that if I am planning on going into applied physics after my B.S., my grad school will probably just be an intership or something like that.

Is that right? That would be pretty awesome. I have a short attention span, so going out and actually doing something would be a lot cooler than staying in school.

Unless it's pushing paper.

That is a very strange advice. Ask your advisor how he would explain, for example, the "Applied Physics" dept. at Stanford. It is actually a physics department, with a heavy concentration on condensed matter, both theoretical and experimental. Applied physics doesn't necessary just mean "engineering".

Zz.
 
Well, she ;) did say that it was for a Master's. I want to go for a Ph.D. I dind't bring that up because I had been in my orientation day thing for like 8 hours already and was just exhausted from it all. And it's not like it's important now.

My career goal is to be something between a physicist and an engineer. I assumed that applied physics would cover that. I know there is also an engineering physics program at some schools, but not at the one I am at.

I want to know all the cool theory, but work with it and put it to use. You know, build stuff, make stuff happen, etc. Instead of the theorist route of calculating or the experimantalists route of doing experiments and lab reports (unless I am mistaken. I only know what I read here and in other places).

My advisor from my community college said that even though he was working a lot with optics and such (instead of "applied physics"), he still built prototypes of machines and stuff like that, so he said it's really vague and open. I just want to make sure I don't end up pushing paper.
 
Poop-Loops said:
I want to know all the cool theory, but work with it and put it to use. You know, build stuff, make stuff happen, etc. Instead of the theorist route of calculating or the experimantalists route of doing experiments and lab reports (unless I am mistaken. I only know what I read here and in other places).

You're mistaken, especially on "experimentalist". Besides, when you go into engineering, you don't think writing "lab reports" is involved?

What you've described you want to do more closely resemble engineering than physics. So maybe you should major in it.

Zz.
 
But that's the thing. I also want to know all the theory that goes behind it all. I want to know why engineering works the way it does.

You know, I'm not really sure what field I need to go to. I've really tried to do my research, but it all comes out really vague in the end.

Yeah, I am probably mistaken on both the theorist and experimentalist. I'm sorry, I don't have much information.

It's not writing up lab reports that I dread, it's just doing run of the mill stuff and pushing paper. I want to work with new technologies and really push research and technology further. I don't know what field. Frankly, I don't care. It's ALL interesting to me.

Do you have any literature I can read up on or something regarding what people do in their professions?

And, if I get my B.S. in physics now, I can still go ahead and get a master's or Ph.D. in engineering later, right?
 
Yes you can get a Masters in Engineering after a BS in Physics. Why not try an Engineering Physics degree?
 
Not offered at my school. Otherwise I probably would have gone for it.
 
transfer to a different school that has an engineering physics degree program or set up a special degree program with your advisor.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K