Applying Cauchy-Schwarz to a sum(Have I understood this correctly?)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cauchy1789
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that the vector space M, consisting of real-valued sequences {x_j} where the sum of squares, ∑_{j=1}^{∞} x_j^2, is finite, possesses an inner product defined by ⟨{x_j}, {y_j}⟩ = ∑_{j=1}^∞ x_j · y_j. Participants emphasize the necessity of proving that the inner product conditions are satisfied individually, rather than making assertions. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between the sum of squared elements and the inner product, particularly in the context of Hilbert spaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inner product spaces in Linear Algebra
  • Familiarity with sequences and series convergence
  • Knowledge of Hilbert spaces and their properties
  • Ability to manipulate and interpret mathematical notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of inner products in vector spaces
  • Learn about the convergence of series and sequences in real analysis
  • Explore the definition and characteristics of Hilbert spaces
  • Investigate the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying Linear Algebra and Real Analysis, as well as educators seeking to clarify the concepts of inner products and vector spaces.

Cauchy1789
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given the vectorspace consisting of a realvalued sequences [tex]\{x_j\}[/tex] where [tex]\sum_{j=1}^{\infty} x_j^2 < \infty[/tex]. Show that M the vectorspace has an innerproduct given by

[tex]\langle \{x_j\}, \{y_j\}\rangle = \sum_{j=1}^\infty x_j \cdot y_j[/tex]

Homework Equations



Since [tex]\{x_j\}[/tex] defines every possible vector component in M, then isn't that equal to that the square sum of every possible realvalued vectorcomponent of the M can be written as [tex]\sum_{j=1}^{\infty} x_j^2 \leq \infty (\mathrm{max} |x_j|)^2 = \infty, j = 1, \ldots, \infty[/tex].?

The Attempt at a Solution



All possible vector of either [tex]\{x_j\}[/tex]or [tex]\{y_j\}[/tex] are considered to be real valued, thus the definition of the inner product from Linear Algebra is true, hence by condition (1) of the innerproduct

[tex]\langle \{x_j\} \cdot \{x_j\} \rangle = x_j ^2[/tex] and thus the innerproduct of every component in either x or y can be written as

[tex]\langle {x_j \} \cdot \{y_j \} \rangle = x_j \cdot y_j, j = 1, \ldots, \infty[/tex]

Have I covered all what is required of me in showing the above?

Sincerely
Cauchy
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Cauchy1789 said:

Homework Statement



Given the vectorspace consisting of a realvalued sequences [tex]\{x_j\}[/tex] where [tex]\sum_{j=1}^{\infty} x_j^2 < \infty[/tex]. Show that M the vectorspace has an innerproduct given by

[tex]\langle \{x_j\}, \{y_j\}\rangle = \sum_{j=1}^\infty x_j \cdot y_j[/tex]

Homework Equations



Since [tex]\{x_j\}[/tex] defines every possible vector component in M, then isn't that equal to that the square sum of every possible realvalued vectorcomponent of the M can be written as [tex]\sum_{j=1}^{\infty} x_j^2 \leq \infty (\mathrm{max} |x_j|)^2 = \infty, j = 1, \ldots, \infty[/tex].?
Why would you say that? You are given that the sum is finite. Why would you then prove that sum is either finite or infinite?:

The Attempt at a Solution



All possible vector of either [tex]\{x_j\}[/tex]or [tex]\{y_j\}[/tex] are considered to be real valued, thus the definition of the inner product from Linear Algebra is true, hence by condition (1) of the innerproduct
I don't know what you mean by this. An inner product is an operator, it is neither true nor false. If you mean the conditions defining an inner product are satisfied, you should show them individually, not just assert it.

[tex]\langle \{x_j\} \cdot \{x_j\} \rangle = x_j ^2[/tex] and thus the innerproduct of every component in either x or y can be written as

[tex]\langle {x_j \} \cdot \{y_j \} \rangle = x_j \cdot y_j, j = 1, \ldots, \infty[/tex]
I have no idea what you are trying to say here. It makes no sense to talk about "the innerproduct of every component". Components are numbers, not vectors and so have no innerproduct.

Have I covered all what is required of me in showing the above?

Sincerely
Cauchy
Have you shown that, if [tex]\sum_{j=1}^{\infty} x_j^2 < \infty[/tex] and [tex]\sum_{j=1}^{\infty} y_j^2 < \infty[/tex], then [tex][tex]\sum_{j=1}^{\infty} x_j^2 < \infty[/tex]?<br /> <br /> Have you shown that [tex]\langle {x_i}, {y_i}\rangle= \sum_{j=1}^{\infty} x_j^2 < \infty[/tex] satisfies the conditions for an inner product?[/tex]
 
HallsofIvy said:
Why would you say that? You are given that the sum is finite. Why would you then prove that sum is either finite or infinite?:

I was simply trying to understand why this sum of squared elements of the series {x_j}
is put into the assigment? And why its less than infinity? I understand that maybe this square respresents that the inner product between elements in the above series.
Isn't the series the same as [tex]\langle x_j, x_j \rangle = \sum_{j=1}^{\infty} x_j^2 = \| x \| ^2 \leq \infty \cdot (\mathrm{max}_{j=1}^{\infty}|x_j|) ^2 = \cdots ? \cdots < \infty[/tex]? Don't I need to understand what should be placed at the questionmark in order to understand how show that the Vectorspace M has an definable innerproduct the sequences x_j and y_j?
Because connection between the sum of sequared real numbers of x_j and the inner product isn't that that my teacher is applying the first definition of inner product of Vectorspace? and then its my job to show that if the above definition hold then to show that definition part 2 and part 3 of the inner product also holds?


I have no idea what you are trying to say here. It makes no sense to talk about "the innerproduct of every component". Components are numbers, not vectors and so have no innerproduct.

What I was trying to say here is that the "component's" be elements of the sequences

x_j and y_j.

Have you shown that, if [tex]\sum_{j=1}^{\infty} x_j^2 < \infty[/tex] and [tex]\sum_{j=1}^{\infty} y_j^2 < \infty[/tex], then [tex]\sum_{j=1}^{\infty} x_j^2 < \infty[/tex]?

Have you shown that [tex]\langle {x_i}, {y_i}\rangle= \sum_{j=1}^{\infty} x_j^2 < \infty[/tex] satisfies the conditions for an inner product?


Because if that is true then [tex]\langle \{x_j\}, \{x_j\} \rangle = \sum_{j =1}^{\infty} x_j^2 = x_1 \cdot x_1 + x_2 \cdot x_2 + \cdots + x_\infty \cdot x_\infty < \infty[/tex]

I will try to go to that :) But its possible to give me a hint on why this sum is less than infinity?

Because a vectorspace M where the above is happening can that be found other place than in sequenced Hilbert spaces? But is that key understand why [tex]\sum x_j < \infty[/tex] where [tex]j = 1,\ldots, \infty[/tex]

Best Regards
Cauchy
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K