Applying S_ operator on composite state |5/2 3/2>

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying the S_- operator on a composite spin state |5/2 3/2> formed from two particles with spins 3/2 and 1. The original poster successfully constructed the total spin state using Clebsch-Gordon coefficients and is now exploring how to apply the S_- operator to this state.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the S_- operator on the composite state, questioning how the values of s and m change as a result. There are attempts to clarify the action of individual S_- operators on the respective components of the state.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing insights into the application of the S_- operator and discussing the necessary steps to expand the equation correctly. There is a recognition of the need to keep coefficients and the importance of correctly applying the operators to the respective parts of the state.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding the proper expansion of the equation and the roles of the individual S_- operators, indicating a need for clarification on the application of these operators in the context of composite states.

vwishndaetr
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Original question:

A system contains two particles: the spin of particle 1 is 3/2 and the spin of particle 2 is 1. Motion of particles can be ignored.

Part A asked to find the total spin state |5/2 3/2> using Clebsch-Gordon coefficients.

I did so, and came up with,

[tex]\mid 5/2\ \ \ 3/2\ \rangle = \sqrt{2/5} \mid 3/2\ \ \ 3/2\ \rangle\mid 1\ \ \ 0\ \rangle + \sqrt{3/5} \mid 3/2\ \ \ 1/2\ \rangle\mid 1\ \ \ 1\ \rangle[/tex]

Had no trouble with that.

Part D asks to apply the operator:

[tex]S_- = S_-^{(1)} + S_-^{(2)}[/tex],

on the composite state constructed in part A.

Now I have,

[tex]S_-\mid s\ \ m \rangle = \sqrt{s(s+1) - m(m-1)}\ \hbar\mid s\ \ m-1 \rangle[/tex]

and

[tex]S_- = S_x - iS_y[/tex]

Kinda don't know where to go from here. I understand that since we are using minus operator, spin will be decreasing. But how do values of s and m change accordingly?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The individual S- operators act on the respective parts of the state. If |s m>=|s1 m1>|s2 m2>, you'd have

[tex]S_-|s\ m\rangle = (S_-^{(1)}|s_1\ m_1\rangle)|s_2\ m_2\rangle+|s_1\ m_1\rangle(S_-^{(2)}|s_2\ m_2\rangle)[/tex]
 
vela said:
The individual S- operators act on the respective parts of the state. If |s m>=|s1 m1>|s2 m2>, you'd have

So for,

[tex]S_-|s\ m\rangle = (S_-^{(1)}|s_1\ m_1\rangle)|s_2\ m_2\rangle+|s_1\ m_1\rangle(S_-^{(2)}|s_2\ m_2\rangle)[/tex]

it would be,

[tex]S_-|5/2\ \ 3/2\rangle = (S_-^{(1)}|3/2\ \ 3/2\rangle)|1\ \ 0\rangle+|3/2\ \ 1/2\rangle(S_-^{(2)}|1\ \ 1\rangle)[/tex]
 
hi! I'm a new member. just got a problem of getting the integral of e to the negative x squared from a to b. not the typical error function from 0 to infinity. please help me out with this. thank you.
 
angie_liamzon said:
hi! I'm a new member. just got a problem of getting the integral of e to the negative x squared from a to b. not the typical error function from 0 to infinity. please help me out with this. thank you.

Try the homework help forum, for calculus.
 
And if my above attempt is true, do I keep the sqrt(2/5) and sqrt(3/5)?
 
Yes, you have to keep the coefficients. Sorry, I should have included them in the line I wrote above.
 
vela said:
Yes, you have to keep the coefficients. Sorry, I should have included them in the line I wrote above.

Awesome! I will post my result in a few min, if you can just check it that'd be great!
 
So,

[tex]S_-|s\ m\rangle = (S_-^{(1)}|s_1\ m_1\rangle)|s_2\ m_2\rangle+|s_1\ m_1\rangle(S_-^{(2)}|s_2\ m_2\rangle)[/tex]

so,

[tex]S_-|5/2\ \ 3/2\rangle = \sqrt{2/5}\ (S_-^{(1)}|3/2\ \ 3/2\rangle)|1\ \ 0\rangle+\sqrt{3/5}\ |3/2\ \ 1/2\rangle(S_-^{(2)}|1\ \ 1\rangle)[/tex]

where,

[tex](S_-^{(1)}|3/2\ \ 3/2\rangle) = \sqrt{3/2(3/2+1) - 3/2(3/2-1)}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ 3/2-1 \rangle = \sqrt{3}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ 1/2 \rangle[/tex]

and,

[tex](S_-^{(2)}|1\ \ 1\rangle) = \sqrt{1(1+1) - 1(1-1)}\ \hbar\mid 1\ \ 1-1 \rangle = \sqrt{2}\ \hbar\mid 1\ \ 0 \rangle[/tex]

Substituting in the previous two, we get:

[tex]S_-|5/2\ \ 3/2\rangle = \sqrt{2/5}\ \sqrt{3}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ 1/2 \rangle|1\ \ 0\rangle+\sqrt{3/5}\ |3/2\ \ 1/2\rangle\sqrt{2}\ \hbar\mid 1\ \ 0 \rangle[/tex]

which equals:

[tex]S_-|5/2\ \ 3/2\rangle = \sqrt{2/5}\ \sqrt{3}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ 1/2 \rangle|1\ \ 0\rangle+\sqrt{3/5}\sqrt{2}\ \hbar\ |3/2\ \ 1/2\rangle\mid 1\ \ 0 \rangle[/tex]

To conclude:

[tex]S_-|5/2\ \ 3/2\rangle = (\sqrt{2/5}\ \sqrt{3}+\sqrt{3/5}\sqrt{2}\ )\ \hbar\\ \mid 3/2\ \ 1/2 \rangle|1\ \ 0\rangle[/tex]

Done correctly ? :)
 
  • #10
vwishndaetr said:
So for,

[tex]S_-|s\ m\rangle = (S_-^{(1)}|s_1\ m_1\rangle)|s_2\ m_2\rangle+|s_1\ m_1\rangle(S_-^{(2)}|s_2\ m_2\rangle)[/tex]

it would be,

[tex]S_-|5/2\ \ 3/2\rangle = (S_-^{(1)}|3/2\ \ 3/2\rangle)|1\ \ 0\rangle+|3/2\ \ 1/2\rangle(S_-^{(2)}|1\ \ 1\rangle)[/tex]

You are forgetting to expand the whole equation out. It is similar to:

(s1+s2)*(v1+v2) = s1*v1+s1*v2+s2*v1+s2*v2

So you should have 4 parts and not just 2.
 
  • #11
OK. I get what you're saying, but little los at the same time.

In this case, what would my "v1" and "v2" be?
 
  • #12
They'd be [itex]\sqrt{2/5} \mid 3/2\ \ \ 3/2\ \rangle\mid 1\ \ \ 0\ \rangle[/itex] and [itex]\sqrt{3/5} \mid 3/2\ \ \ 1/2\ \rangle\mid 1\ \ \ 1\ \rangle[/itex].
 
  • #13
So you have:

[tex]S_{-}\mid 5/2\ \ \ 3/2\ \rangle = \left( S_{-}^{1}+S_{-}^{2}\right) \cdot \left( \sqrt{2/5} \mid 3/2\ \ \ 3/2\ \rangle\mid 1\ \ \ 0\ \rangle + \sqrt{3/5} \mid 3/2\ \ \ 1/2\ \rangle\mid 1\ \ \ 1\ \rangle \right)[/tex]

[tex]= \sqrt{2/5}(S_{-}^{1}\mid 3/2\ \ \ 3/2\ \rangle)\mid 1\ \ \ 0\ \rangle+\sqrt{3/5}(S_{-}^{1}\mid 3/2\ \ \ 1/2\ \rangle)\mid 1\ \ \ 1\ \rangle+...[/tex]
 
  • #14
Oooo. For some reason when I saw (s1+s2)*(v1+v2) = s1*v1+s1*v2+s2*v1+s2*v2, I was thinking s1*(v1+s1)*(v2+s2)*(v1+s2)*v2 and it made me think in circles. Silly mistake on my part.

Thanks to the both of you! I will be back in a couple to make sure I got it! :)
 
  • #15
Continuing with this,

[tex]S_{-}\mid 5/2\ \ \ 3/2\ \rangle = \left( S_{-}^{1}+S_{-}^{2}\right) \cdot \left( \sqrt{2/5} \mid 3/2\ \ \ 3/2\ \rangle\mid 1\ \ \ 0\ \rangle + \sqrt{3/5} \mid 3/2\ \ \ 1/2\ \rangle\mid 1\ \ \ 1\ \rangle \right)[/tex]

[tex]= \sqrt{2/5}(S_{-}^{1}\mid 3/2\ \ \ 3/2\ \rangle)\mid 1\ \ \ 0\ \rangle+\sqrt{3/5}(S_{-}^{1}\mid 3/2\ \ \ 1/2\ \rangle)\mid 1\ \ \ 1\ \rangle+ \sqrt{2/5}(S_{-}^{2}\mid 3/2\ \ \ 3/2\ \rangle)\mid 1\ \ \ 0\ \rangle+\sqrt{3/5}(S_{-}^{2}\mid 3/2\ \ \ 1/2\ \rangle)\mid 1\ \ \ 1\ \rangle[/tex]

Now applying:

[tex]S_-\mid s\ \ m \rangle = \sqrt{s(s+1) - m(m-1)}\ \hbar\mid s\ \ m-1 \rangle[/tex]

First,

[tex]S_-\mid 3/2\ \ 3/2 \rangle = \sqrt{3/2(3/2+1) - 3/2(3/2-1)}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ 3/2-1 \rangle = \sqrt{3}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ 1/2 \rangle[/tex]

second,

[tex]S_-\mid 3/2\ \ 1/2 \rangle = \sqrt{3/2(3/2+1) - 1/2(1/2-1)}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ 1/2-1 \rangle = \sqrt{4}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ -1/2 \rangle[/tex]

Substituiting:[tex]S_{-}\mid 5/2\ \ \ 3/2\ \rangle = \sqrt{2/5}(\sqrt{3}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ 1/2 \rangle)\mid 1\ \ \ 0\ \rangle+\sqrt{3/5}(\sqrt{4}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ -1/2 \rangle)\mid 1\ \ \ 1\ \rangle+ \sqrt{2/5}\sqrt{3}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ 1/2 \rangle)\mid 1\ \ \ 0\ \rangle+\sqrt{3/5}(\sqrt{4}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ -1/2 \rangle)\mid 1\ \ \ 1\ \rangle[/tex]

Now, simplifying, I want to combine to two terms:

[tex]S_{-}\mid 5/2\ \ \ 3/2\ \rangle = 2\sqrt{6/5}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ 1/2 \rangle\mid 1\ \ \ 0\ \rangle+2\sqrt{3/5}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ -1/2 \rangle\mid 1\ \ \ 1\ \rangle[/tex]

Crossing my fingers. . .
 
  • #16
You don't have [itex]S_-^{(2)}[/itex] acting on the right part of the states.
 
  • #17
Yes and no.

Don't S_^1 |3/2 3/2> and S_^2 |3/2 3/2> essentially equal the same thing?
 
  • #18
Wait are you saying that I am not acting on |1 0> for say in the first term?
 
  • #19
Yeah. S1 only acts on the first ket in a product, while S2 only acts on the second ket.
 
  • #20
vela said:
Yeah. S1 only acts on the first ket in a product, while S2 only acts on the second ket.

Ok. So let me get this. . .

S1 acts on the |3/2 3/2> and |3/2 1/2> and the S2 acts on the |1 0> and |1 1>.
 
  • #21
Going for a correct attempt:

[tex]S_{-}\mid 5/2\ \ \ 3/2\ \rangle = \left( S_{-}^{1}+S_{-}^{2}\right) \cdot \left( \sqrt{2/5} \mid 3/2\ \ \ 3/2\ \rangle\mid 1\ \ \ 0\ \rangle + \sqrt{3/5} \mid 3/2\ \ \ 1/2\ \rangle\mid 1\ \ \ 1\ \rangle \right)[/tex]

[tex]= \sqrt{2/5}(S_{-}^{1}\mid 3/2\ \ \ 3/2\ \rangle)\mid 1\ \ \ 0\ \rangle+\sqrt{3/5}(S_{-}^{1}\mid 3/2\ \ \ 1/2\ \rangle)\mid 1\ \ \ 1\ \rangle+ \sqrt{2/5}\mid 3/2\ \ \ 3/2\ \rangle(S_{-}^{2}\mid 1\ \ \ 0\ \rangle)+\sqrt{3/5}\mid 3/2\ \ \ 1/2\ \rangle(S_{-}^{2}\mid 1\ \ \ 1\ \rangle)[/tex]

Now applying:

[tex]S_-\mid s\ \ m \rangle = \sqrt{s(s+1) - m(m-1)}\ \hbar\mid s\ \ m-1 \rangle[/tex]

First,

[tex]S_-^{(1)}\mid 3/2\ \ 3/2 \rangle = \sqrt{3/2(3/2+1) - 3/2(3/2-1)}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ 3/2-1 \rangle = \sqrt{3}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ 1/2 \rangle[/tex]

second,

[tex]S_-^{(1)}\mid 3/2\ \ 1/2 \rangle = \sqrt{3/2(3/2+1) - 1/2(1/2-1)}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ 1/2-1 \rangle = \sqrt{4}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ -1/2 \rangle[/tex]

third,

[tex]S_-^{(2)}\mid 1\ \ 0 \rangle = \sqrt{1(1+1) - 0(0-1)}\ \hbar\mid 1\ \ 0-1 \rangle = \sqrt{2}\ \hbar\mid 1\ \ -1\rangle[/tex]

fourth,

[tex]S_-^{(2)}\mid 1\ \ 1 \rangle = \sqrt{1(1+1) - 1(1-1)}\ \hbar\mid 1\ \ 1-1 \rangle = \sqrt{2}\ \hbar\mid 1\ \ 0\rangle[/tex]

Substituiting:

[tex]= \sqrt{2/5}(\sqrt{3}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ 1/2 \rangle)\mid 1\ \ \ 0\ \rangle+\sqrt{3/5}(\sqrt{4}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ -1/2 \rangle)\mid 1\ \ \ 1\ \rangle+ \sqrt{2/5}\mid 3/2\ \ \ 3/2\ \rangle(\sqrt{2}\ \hbar\mid 1\ \ -1\rangle)+\sqrt{3/5}\mid 3/2\ \ \ 1/2\ \rangle(\sqrt{2}\ \hbar\mid 1\ \ 0\rangle)[/tex]

Now, simplifying,

[tex]= \sqrt{6/5}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ 1/2 \rangle\mid 1\ \ \ 0\ \rangle+\2sqrt{3/5}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ -1/2 \rangle\mid 1\ \ \ 1\ \rangle+ \sqrt{4/5}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ \ 3/2\ \rangle\mid 1\ \ -1\rangle+\sqrt{6/5}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ \ 1/2\ \rangle\mid 1\ \ 0\rangle[/tex]

Combining first and fourth,

[tex]= 2\sqrt{6/5}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ 1/2 \rangle\mid 1\ \ \ 0\ \rangle+\2\sqrt{3/5}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ -1/2 \rangle\mid 1\ \ \ 1\ \rangle+ \sqrt{4/5}\ \hbar\mid 3/2\ \ \ 3/2\ \rangle\mid 1\ \ -1\rangle[/tex]

I am eager to say there is no room for mistakes, but I thought I had it 3 hrs ago. Can I get a "You got it!" ?
 
  • #22
I didn't check all the details, but your set-up looks fine. As long as you didn't make any arithmetic mistakes, I'd say you got it!
 
  • #23
Fantastic.

Thanks so much for the prompt responses! I can now go to sleep!

Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K