Applying the Chain Rule to y=(2x2+4x)5

  • Thread starter Thread starter anthonyk2013
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chain Chain rule
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around differentiating the function y=(2x²+4x)⁵ using the chain rule, a topic within calculus. Participants explore the application of the chain rule and the algebraic manipulations involved in the differentiation process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the chain rule and the differentiation steps, questioning the correctness of expressions and the need for parentheses in the calculations. There are inquiries about simplifying the resulting expression and factoring terms.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes attempts to clarify algebraic errors and the proper application of the chain rule. Some participants provide guidance on factoring and suggest reviewing algebra to improve understanding. Multiple interpretations of the differentiation steps are being explored, with no explicit consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention constraints related to balancing study with personal responsibilities, which may impact their ability to focus on algebra skills necessary for calculus. There is an acknowledgment of the importance of algebra proficiency in successfully applying calculus concepts.

anthonyk2013
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
Differentiate the following by rule y=(2x2+4x)5

Is the chain rule the right rule to use?

dy/dx=dy/du*du/dx

Let U=2x2+4x

du/dx=4x+4

y=(u)5 → dy/du=5(u)4

dy/dx=5(u)4*4x+4

dy/dx=5(2x2+4x)4*4x+4

dy/dx= 30(2x2+4x)44x

dy/dx= 30(2x216x)4

I'm wondering if I am on the right track?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anthonyk, your questions should be posted in the Homework & Coursework sections (Calculus & Beyond) - not in the technical math sections.
 
Mark44 said:
Anthonyk, your questions should be posted in the Homework & Coursework sections (Calculus & Beyond) - not in the technical math sections.

ok no problem
 
anthonyk2013 said:
Differentiate the following by rule y=(2x2+4x)5

Is the chain rule the right rule to use?

dy/dx=dy/du*du/dx

Let U=2x2+4x

du/dx=4x+4

y=(u)5 → dy/du=5(u)4

dy/dx=5(u)4*4x+4

dy/dx=5(2x2+4x)4*4x+4

dy/dx= 30(2x2+4x)44x

dy/dx= 30(2x216x)4

I'm wondering if I am on the right track?

I hope you did not mean what you wrote, which was
[tex]\frac{dy}{dx} = 5(x^2 + 4x)^4 4x + 4, \text{ which } = 4 +5(x^2 + 4x)^4 4x[/tex]
I hope you meant
[tex]\frac{dy}{dx} = 5(x^2 + 4x)^4 (4x + 4)[/tex]
If that is what you did mean, that is what you should write; note the parentheses.
 
anthonyk2013 said:
Differentiate the following by rule y=(2x2+4x)5

Is the chain rule the right rule to use?

dy/dx=dy/du*du/dx

Let U=2x2+4x

du/dx=4x+4

y=(u)5 → dy/du=5(u)4

dy/dx=5(u)4*4x+4
Use parentheses where they are needed.
The right side should be 5u4 * (4x + 4)
anthonyk2013 said:
dy/dx=5(2x2+4x)4*4x+4
That last factor should be (4x + 4)
anthonyk2013 said:
dy/dx= 30(2x2+4x)44x
No. I can't tell what you did here. How did you get 30 at the beginning of the right side?
anthonyk2013 said:
dy/dx= 30(2x216x)4

I'm wondering if I am on the right track?
 
anthonyk2013 said:
dy/dx=5(2x2+4x)4*4x+4

dy/dx= 30(2x2+4x)44x

dy/dx= 30(2x216x)4
In addition to what Ray noted, I can't figure out what you did to get the last two lines. You need to go back and review algebra.
 
Ray Vickson said:
I hope you did not mean what you wrote, which was
[tex]\frac{dy}{dx} = 5(x^2 + 4x)^4 4x + 4, \text{ which } = 4 +5(x^2 + 4x)^4 4x[/tex]
I hope you meant
[tex]\frac{dy}{dx} = 5(x^2 + 4x)^4 (4x + 4)[/tex]
If that is what you did mean, that is what you should write; note the parentheses.

Ya sorry that is what I meant.

can I simplify this further or can I leave it like that?
 
Ray Vickson said:
I hope you did not mean what you wrote, which was
[tex]\frac{dy}{dx} = 5(x^2 + 4x)^4 4x + 4, \text{ which } = 4 +5(x^2 + 4x)^4 4x[/tex]
I hope you meant
[tex]\frac{dy}{dx} = 5(x^2 + 4x)^4 (4x + 4)[/tex]
If that is what you did mean, that is what you should write; note the parentheses.
anthonyk2013 said:
Ya sorry that is what I meant.

can I simplify this further or can I leave it like that?
You can factor 4 out of the 4x + 4 term, and put it with the 5 factor. Otherwise, that's about all you can do. For most purposes, leaving it in factored form is preferable to multiplying everything out.
 
Mark44 said:
You can factor 4 out of the 4x + 4 term, and put it with the 5 factor. Otherwise, that's about all you can do. For most purposes, leaving it in factored form is preferable to multiplying everything out.

dy/dx=20(2x2+4x)*(4x) this what you mean
 
  • #10
anthonyk2013 said:
dy/dx=20(2x2+4x)*(4x) this what you mean
No. Like vela said, you need to take some time to review algebra.

Starting from here:
dy/dx=5(2x2+4x)4 * (4x+4), factor 4 out of the last expression in parentheses, and combine that 4 with the leading 5. You did this, but the problem is that 4x + 4 ≠ 4*x. That seems to be what you're doing.
 
  • #11
Mark44 said:
No. Like vela said, you need to take some time to review algebra.

Starting from here:
dy/dx=5(2x2+4x)4 * (4x+4), factor 4 out of the last expression in parentheses, and combine that 4 with the leading 5. You did this, but the problem is that 4x + 4 ≠ 4*x. That seems to be what you're doing.

dy/dx=5+4(2x2+4x)44x

dy/dx=9(2x2+4x)44x

or

dy/dx=10x2+20x*(4x+4)
 
Last edited:
  • #12
none of those. take your time, just using rules of arithmetic that you are certain about. for example, (4x+4) = 4*(x+1) right? So then what does the equation look like?
 
  • #13
BruceW said:
none of those. take your time, just using rules of arithmetic that you are certain about. for example, (4x+4) = 4*(x+1) right? So then what does the equation look like?

I know this is probably very simple I just can't get it.

dy/dx=5(2x2+4x)*(4x+4)

Do I separate it out and treat 5(2x2+4x) from (4x+4)

5(2x2+4x)*4(x+1)?
 
  • #14
yeah, almost. you forgot the first bit should be to the power of four. so it is 5(2x2+4x)4*4(x+1) And yes, it is fine to 'separate out'. In arithmetic, it is always OK to say a*(b*c)=a*b*c i.e. in this case 5(2x2+4x)4*(4x+4) = 5(2x2+4x)4*4(x+1)
 
  • #15
BruceW said:
yeah, almost. you forgot the first bit should be to the power of four. so it is 5(2x2+4x)4*4(x+1) And yes, it is fine to 'separate out'. In arithmetic, it is always OK to say abc=a(bc) i.e. in this case 5(2x2+4x)4*(4x+4) = 5(2x2+4x)4*4(x+1)

5(2x2+4x)4*4(x+1)

Thanks very much, frustrating that its so simple. thanks again
 
  • #16
glad to have helped! yeah, I'm writing Makefiles at the moment, which should be a simple programming thing to do. But it's taking me ages! haha
 
  • #17
BruceW said:
glad to have helped! yeah, I'm writing Makefiles at the moment, which should be a simple programming thing to do. But it's taking me ages! haha

Best of luck.
 
  • #18
anthonyk2013 said:
Best of luck.
You are really not going to be able to do calculus unless you have good facility with algebra. You did not realize that you could combine the factors 5 and 4 to give 20. Your previous posts had several algebra errors in them. I implore you to please follow Vela's advice and review algebra.

Chet
 
  • #19
Chestermiller said:
You are really not going to be able to do calculus unless you have good facility with algebra. You did not realize that you could combine the factors 5 and 4 to give 20. Your previous posts had several algebra errors in them. I implore you to please follow Vela's advice and review algebra.

Chet


Thanks I have been looking over it today. It's just the work load of study, job and kids I can only do so much.

I can multiply 5*4 to get 20. Can I do anything with what in the bracket?
 
  • #20
anthonyk2013 said:
Thanks I have been looking over it today. It's just the work load of study, job and kids I can only do so much.

I can multiply 5*4 to get 20. Can I do anything with what in the bracket?
Yes, you can factor out a 2, and, when it comes out of the bracket, it becomes 24=16, which, when multiplied by the 20 becomes 320.

Chet
 
  • #21
anthonyk2013 said:
Thanks I have been looking over it today. It's just the work load of study, job and kids I can only do so much.
You'll be much more efficient at studying once you get the algebra down. You don't want to be wasting time struggling with algebra instead of concentrating on the material you're supposed to be learning. I'll note that with this problem, you had the calculus part — applying the chain rule — done correctly; it was only the subsequent algebra that was a problem. It might feel like reviewing algebra is a low priority, but you really should make it a higher one.
 
  • #22
I agree with what vela and Chet have said. I recognize that you have a lot of time constraints at the moment, with kids, job, and school, but a small amount of time spent at bolstering your algebra skills (say, 30 minutes of focused effort a day) will save a lot of time down the road.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #23
I will try and put some time aside for algebra, thanks for advice and help I appreciate it. Cheers and happy st Patrick's day :-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K