Applying the Kutzbach Gruebler criterion to a pantograph

  • Thread starter Thread starter amrbekhit
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on applying the Kutzbach Gruebler criterion to analyze the degrees of freedom (DOF) in various mechanical linkages, specifically a pantograph mechanism and another unspecified mechanism. The user initially miscounts the joints and fails to recognize the need to account for joints that connect multiple links multiple times. The correct application of the criterion reveals that the pantograph has 2 DOF, while the other mechanism is identified as 1 DOF. Key insights include the importance of accurately counting joints that connect more than two links.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Kutzbach Gruebler equation
  • Familiarity with degrees of freedom (DOF) in mechanical systems
  • Knowledge of joint types: rotary and prismatic
  • Basic concepts of planar mechanisms and linkages
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Kutzbach Gruebler criterion in detail
  • Learn about ternary and quaternary joints in mechanical systems
  • Explore examples of complex mechanisms to practice DOF calculations
  • Investigate the implications of overconstrained mechanisms in design
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, robotics designers, and students studying kinematics who seek to deepen their understanding of mechanism analysis and degrees of freedom calculations.

amrbekhit
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
Hello all,

I'm having trouble understanding how to apply the Kutzbach Gruebler equation to all but the simplest of mechanisms.

As I understand it, the DOFs of a mechanism is a sum of the DOFs of all the moving links minus the sum of the all the DOFs constrained by the joints. For a planar four bar linkage with one link grounded, there are 3 moving links (so total DOFs = 3 links * 3 DOF = 9) and 4 rotary joints (constrained DOFs = 4 joints * 2 DOF = 8). The total DOF = 9 - 8 = 1.

Now consider the pantograph mechanism shown in the attached picture. I can see that there are a total of 7 links (including the base), 6 of which are moving (total DOFs = 6 links * 3 DOF = 18). However, I can only identify 7 joints (5 rotary, 2 prismatic), which would constrain a total of 7 * 2 = 14 DOF, giving the total DOFs as 18 - 14 = 4, which I know is incorrect. According to the book I got the picture out of, there are actually 8 joints, which gives the correct answer of 2 DOF.

Likewise, I also have a problem with the mechanism on the left hand side of the following image:

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~rapidproto/mechanisms/figures/dcacu.gif

I can see 5 moving links (15 DOF) but only 6 joints (5 rotary and 1 prismatic: 12 DOF) instead of 7, giving a total DOF = 3, whereas the correct answer (according to the site) is 1.

So, for some reason, there always seems to be an extra joint that I'm unable to identify. What am I missing?

Thanks

Amr
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0412.jpg
    IMAG0412.jpg
    22.2 KB · Views: 1,096
Engineering news on Phys.org
It seems you're forgetting to count the joint multiple times on the mechanism that joins more than 2 links. On the pantograph, you have to count the joint that joins links 2, 4, and 5 twice. On the left hand side of the image you linked to, joint C needs to be counted twice because it joins links 2, 3, and 4. Any time N links are constrained by the same pin joint, you count that joint N-1 times.
 
Ah that's it, thanks. That explains what the book meant when it was describing ternary and quaternary joints.
 
I've attached a photo for another mechanism that is keeping me scratching my head.

As far as I can tell, this is a 1DOF mechanism, with a single linear actuator allowing the fingers to rotate together about a certain point.

I've highlighted in the image where I think the moving links are. I reckon that each pinion and adjoining link are rigidly linked, and connected to ground via a pin joint.

The list of moving links is:
  • 1 x Linear actuator/rack (dark green).
  • 2 x Pinion/inside link (blue, magenta).
  • 2 x Outside link (red, lime).
  • 2 x Finger (brown, black).

Resulting in 7 links and a total of 7 * 3 = 21 DOF.

The list of joints is:
  • 1 x prismatic joint.
  • 2 x rack/pinion joint.
  • 8 x revolute joint.

Resulting in 11 joints a total of 11 * 2 = 22 constrained DOF.

Unfortunately, this would imply that the mechanism is overconstrained, which it isn't. What am I missing?

Amr
 

Attachments

  • parallel gripper.jpg
    parallel gripper.jpg
    44.7 KB · Views: 1,141

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K