Applying the Kutzbach Gruebler criterion to a pantograph

  • Thread starter Thread starter amrbekhit
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the Kutzbach Gruebler criterion to various mechanical mechanisms, specifically focusing on the analysis of degrees of freedom (DOF) in pantographs and other linkages. Participants explore the challenges of identifying joints and calculating DOFs in more complex mechanisms.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant, Amr, describes difficulties in applying the Kutzbach Gruebler equation to mechanisms beyond simple cases, specifically a pantograph and another mechanism.
  • Amr calculates the DOFs for a pantograph as 4, based on 6 moving links and 7 joints, but notes that the correct answer is 2 according to a reference.
  • Another participant suggests that Amr may be overlooking the need to count certain joints multiple times when they connect more than two links, specifically mentioning the pantograph's joint connecting links 2, 4, and 5.
  • Amr acknowledges this clarification and connects it to the concept of ternary and quaternary joints.
  • Amr presents a new mechanism and calculates it as 1 DOF, but finds a discrepancy in the number of joints, leading to a conclusion that the mechanism appears overconstrained.
  • Amr lists 7 moving links and 11 joints, resulting in a calculation of 21 total DOFs and 22 constrained DOFs, raising questions about the mechanism's constraints.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the identification and counting of joints in complex mechanisms. While there is some agreement on the necessity of counting certain joints multiple times, the overall discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct identification of joints and the resulting calculations of DOFs in the new mechanism presented by Amr.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully resolved the assumptions regarding joint counting, particularly in mechanisms with multiple links connected by a single joint. There is also uncertainty about the classification of the new mechanism presented by Amr and its constraints.

amrbekhit
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
Hello all,

I'm having trouble understanding how to apply the Kutzbach Gruebler equation to all but the simplest of mechanisms.

As I understand it, the DOFs of a mechanism is a sum of the DOFs of all the moving links minus the sum of the all the DOFs constrained by the joints. For a planar four bar linkage with one link grounded, there are 3 moving links (so total DOFs = 3 links * 3 DOF = 9) and 4 rotary joints (constrained DOFs = 4 joints * 2 DOF = 8). The total DOF = 9 - 8 = 1.

Now consider the pantograph mechanism shown in the attached picture. I can see that there are a total of 7 links (including the base), 6 of which are moving (total DOFs = 6 links * 3 DOF = 18). However, I can only identify 7 joints (5 rotary, 2 prismatic), which would constrain a total of 7 * 2 = 14 DOF, giving the total DOFs as 18 - 14 = 4, which I know is incorrect. According to the book I got the picture out of, there are actually 8 joints, which gives the correct answer of 2 DOF.

Likewise, I also have a problem with the mechanism on the left hand side of the following image:

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~rapidproto/mechanisms/figures/dcacu.gif

I can see 5 moving links (15 DOF) but only 6 joints (5 rotary and 1 prismatic: 12 DOF) instead of 7, giving a total DOF = 3, whereas the correct answer (according to the site) is 1.

So, for some reason, there always seems to be an extra joint that I'm unable to identify. What am I missing?

Thanks

Amr
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0412.jpg
    IMAG0412.jpg
    22.2 KB · Views: 1,113
Engineering news on Phys.org
It seems you're forgetting to count the joint multiple times on the mechanism that joins more than 2 links. On the pantograph, you have to count the joint that joins links 2, 4, and 5 twice. On the left hand side of the image you linked to, joint C needs to be counted twice because it joins links 2, 3, and 4. Any time N links are constrained by the same pin joint, you count that joint N-1 times.
 
Ah that's it, thanks. That explains what the book meant when it was describing ternary and quaternary joints.
 
I've attached a photo for another mechanism that is keeping me scratching my head.

As far as I can tell, this is a 1DOF mechanism, with a single linear actuator allowing the fingers to rotate together about a certain point.

I've highlighted in the image where I think the moving links are. I reckon that each pinion and adjoining link are rigidly linked, and connected to ground via a pin joint.

The list of moving links is:
  • 1 x Linear actuator/rack (dark green).
  • 2 x Pinion/inside link (blue, magenta).
  • 2 x Outside link (red, lime).
  • 2 x Finger (brown, black).

Resulting in 7 links and a total of 7 * 3 = 21 DOF.

The list of joints is:
  • 1 x prismatic joint.
  • 2 x rack/pinion joint.
  • 8 x revolute joint.

Resulting in 11 joints a total of 11 * 2 = 22 constrained DOF.

Unfortunately, this would imply that the mechanism is overconstrained, which it isn't. What am I missing?

Amr
 

Attachments

  • parallel gripper.jpg
    parallel gripper.jpg
    44.7 KB · Views: 1,145

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K