Applying time reversal to the free particle wavefunction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of time reversal to the wavefunction of a free particle, specifically examining the transformation of the wavefunction under time reversal and its implications for momentum and energy.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the correct application of time reversal to the wavefunction, questioning the implications of simply flipping the sign of time and momentum. There is a discussion about the properties of the resulting wavefunction and its agreement with established literature.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the necessary conditions for a time-reversed wavefunction, noting that simply replacing time may not yield the correct state. There is an acknowledgment of differing results between the original poster's calculations and those found in a referenced text, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of time reversal in quantum mechanics, including the need for complex conjugation in certain cases and the nature of the time reversal operator. There is an underlying assumption that the Hamiltonian is invariant under time reversal.

Hypersquare
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi there!

I have tried to apply time reversal (which makes t -> -t) to a free particle wavefunction:

Exp[i(p.r-Et)/[itex]\hbar[/itex]]

and got:

Exp[-i(p.r-Et)/[itex]\hbar[/itex]]

I got this by flipping the sign of p since it has a d/dt part, and flipping the t in the Et part. However I think this is wrong since in B.R. Martin's Nuclear and particle physics (page 12) he gets:

Exp[-i(p.r+Et)/[itex]\hbar[/itex]]

What have I missed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Hypersquare. We would like the time reversed wavefunction to represent another free particle with opposite momentum but with the same energy. Apply the momentum and energy operators to your function and see if it has both of these properties. Then try the function given in Martin's book.
 
Thanks TSny. I did both of those and it seems that BR Martin was correct! My energy comes out negative and his positive. The solutions agree on application of the momentum operator though. This means that I have misunderstood something entirely then. I am not sure what though.
 
The key point is that just replacing t by -t in a wavefunction does not yield the wavefunction that would describe the "time-reversed" state. For spinless particles, you get the time-reversed state by replacing t by -t and also taking the complex conjugate of the wavefunction. You can check this for Martin's example. For particles with spin, it's more complicated.

If you inspect the Schrödinger equation, you can see that if ψ(r, t) satisfies the equation, then ψ(r, -t) does not satisfy the equation, whereas ψ*(r,-t) does. (This assumes a Hamiltonian which is invariant under time reversal.)

In general, a time reversal operator in quantum mechanics is not a linear operator, but an "antilinear" operator. This is discussed in some of the standard texts.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K