Approaching vehicles with acceleration

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
JohnnyGui
Messages
802
Reaction score
51

Homework Statement


Two vehicles, A and B, are approaching each other. Vehicle A has a constant velocity of ##v_A##. Vehicle B has a constant acceleration ##a## with an initial velocity of ##v_B##. The starting distance at ##t=0## between them is ##D##.

Is there a way to solve at what time ##t## they'd meet?

Homework Equations



##D = v_At + v_Bt + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a \cdot t^2##

The Attempt at a Solution


I deduced the equation above but I can't find a way to solve for t. Simplifying gives:

##\frac{D}{t} = v_A + v_B + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a \cdot t##

Is there a way to solve for t without plotting these two equations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JohnnyGui said:

Homework Statement


Two vehicles, A and B, are approaching each other. Vehicle A has a constant velocity of ##v_A##. Vehicle B has a constant acceleration ##a## with an initial velocity of ##v_B##. The starting distance at ##t=0## between them is ##D##.

Is there a way to solve at what time ##t## they'd meet?

Homework Equations



##D = v_At + v_Bt + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a \cdot t^2##

The Attempt at a Solution


I deduced the equation above but I can't find a way to solve for t. Simplifying gives:

##\frac{D}{t} = v_A + v_B + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a \cdot t##

Is there a way to solve for t without plotting these two equations?

It is just a quadratic equation in ##t##, so is easily solved using the standard quadratic-solution formulas.
 
PeroK said:
Your equation looks very like a quadratic in ttt to me!

Ray Vickson said:
It is just a quadratic equation in ttt, so is easily solved using the standard quadratic-solution formulas.

Ah, for some reason I thought this wasn't possible because there are two parameters with either a ##t## or a ##\frac{1}{t}## in it. But after looking at it I noticed it could be written as:

##\frac{1}{2} \cdot at^2 + (v_A + v_B)t - D = 0##

And then use the abc-formula in which ##a=\frac{1}{2}\cdot a## and ##b=(v_A + v_B)## and ##c = D##. Is this correct?
 
JohnnyGui said:
Ah, for some reason I thought this wasn't possible because there are two parameters with either a ##t## or a ##\frac{1}{t}## in it. But after looking at it I noticed it could be written as:

##\frac{1}{2} \cdot at^2 + (v_A + v_B)t - D = 0##

And then use the abc-formula in which ##a=\frac{1}{2}\cdot a## and ##b=(v_A + v_B)## and ##c = D##. Is this correct?

You already had the quadratic in section 2 of your original post.

I guess you mean ##c = -D##?

You may like to think what difference it makes if vehicle A is at rest and vehicle B is initially moving at the combined speed ##v_a + v_b##.
 
PeroK said:
You already had the quadratic in section 2 of your original post.

I guess you mean ##c = -D##?

You may like to think what difference it makes if vehicle A is at rest and vehicle B is initially moving at the combined speed ##v_a + v_b##.
Apologies, I did mean ##c = -D##. I take it you mean that I could just put the equation in section 2 in parentheses? My initial target was to use the abc-formula to only give the positive solution of ##t##.