Approximate diagonalisation of (3,3) hermitian matrix

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the diagonalization of a complex 3x3 Hermitian matrix K using a unitary matrix S, specifically seeking approximate expressions for S's entries in terms of K's entries. The user, Susy, inquires about methods to derive S from K, particularly when K's entries are expressed as a power series in a small parameter ε. Participants confirm that simultaneous diagonalization of K0 and Kε is feasible, with K0 typically being diagonal and Kε serving as a correction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hermitian matrices and their properties
  • Familiarity with unitary matrices and their role in diagonalization
  • Knowledge of power series expansions and perturbation theory
  • Experience with Mathematica for symbolic computation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for approximate diagonalization of Hermitian matrices
  • Learn about perturbation theory in quantum mechanics
  • Explore symbolic computation techniques in Mathematica
  • Investigate generalized eigenvalue problems and their numerical solutions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and computational scientists involved in matrix analysis, particularly those working with Hermitian matrices and seeking efficient diagonalization techniques.

SUSY
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a 3 by 3 hermitian matrix K that I need to diagonalise. More accurately, I am searching for a unitary matrix S such that S^{\dagger} K S is diagonal.

The problem is that K is very complicated and the expression for S in mathematica takes up quiiiiiet a lot of space.

Is it possible to find approximate expressions for the entries of S in terms of entries in K? What I am looking for is something like (as an example) S_{ij}=K_{ij} + K_{ji} bla bla
Or is it maybe possible to decompose S into matrices which I can then approximate by such expressions (they can, of course, be more complicated than the example given above).

Since the entries in K are given as a power series of some small parameter ε K_{ij}=a_0 + a_1 \epsilon + ... and I am only interested in the lowest non-vanishing order anyway, it would be nice to have expressions for the entries in S in terms of the entries in K. Then, I could easily evaluate the entries in S to lowest non-vanishing order in ε (so I am only interested in an approximate S anyway).

Does anybody know of such a method?

Thanks,
Susy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you can write ##K = K_0 + \epsilon K_\epsilon##, can you diagonalize ##K_0## and ##K_\epsilon## simultaneously? This is routinely done numerically, as a generalized eigenproblem, but I don't know about doing it symbolically.
 
Yes, you should be able to diagonalize both simultaneously. In all cases I can think of, $K_0$ will already be a diagonal matrix and $K_{\epsilon}$ is a correction ($K_{\epsilon}$ can in principle be an arbitrary hermitian matrix).
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K