Approximate solution to DE - confused

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

This discussion revolves around finding an approximate solution to a second-order differential equation, specifically focusing on the behavior of the solution as x becomes large and positive. The equation in question is y'' - (3/x)y' + (15/(4x^2) + x^(1/2))y = 0.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster expresses confusion regarding the hint to remove the first derivative term and questions the logic behind neglecting certain terms in the equation. Some participants suggest alternative approaches, such as changing variables to t = 1/x for a small-t approximation. Others propose numerical methods to validate assumptions about which terms can be neglected for large x.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various methods to analyze the differential equation. Some have attempted numerical solutions to compare the original equation with simplified versions, while others are still grappling with the implications of the hint provided. There is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet, but productive lines of inquiry are being pursued.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original problem is derived from an exam and that there may be discrepancies in the provided solution, which was authored by a student. The discussion includes considerations of what terms can be neglected based on their relative sizes as x increases.

outhsakotad
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is a problem from an old exam I am reviewing for practice.

Find a good approximation, for x large and positive to the solution of the following equation:

y''-(3/x)y'+(15/(4x^2)+x^(1/2))y=0

Hint: remove first derivative term

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

I'm not sure first of all that I understand the logic behind the hint. After taking this suggestion, my first inclination is to throw away the 15/4x^2 term, leaving y''+sqrt(x)y=0. This is an equation that while it seems simple, I'm ashamed to say I can't figure out how to solve.

Also, according to the problem's solution, you actually throw away just the x^(1/2)y term. This leaves an easily solvable homogeneous Cauchy-Euler DE. But the logic doesn't seem to make sense to me. The solution says that x^(1/2)y and (3/x)y' are negligible at large x. However, isn't the 15/4x^2 term much smaller than these terms?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would it help to set t=1/x, then look for a small-t approximation? I haven't tried it and have no access to a computer at the moment.

RGV
 
Tell you what, how might you confirm your suspicions? I mean what would you do to figure this out on your own? What about just running the DEs and checking for yourself? How about start with x0=10 000 say for y(x0)=1 and y'(x0)=1. That's large enought huh? Now, run them numerically, first the original DE, then run versions of the DE without one or more of the other terms and then see how well the simplified versions approximate the original equation. Here's what I would do in Mathematica. At least at x=10,000, it's pretty convincing to me what's important and not important to leave in for large x.

Code:
x0 = 10000; 
y0 = 1; 
y1 = 1; 

mysol = NDSolve[{Derivative[2][y][x] - (3/x)*Derivative[1][y][x] + (15/(4*x^2) + Sqrt[x])*y[x] == 0, y[x0] == y0, 
    Derivative[1][y][x0] == y1}, y, {x, x0, x0 + 10}]

p1 = Plot[y[x] /. mysol, {x, x0, x0 + 10}]

mysol2 = NDSolve[{Derivative[2][y][x] - (3/x)*Derivative[1][y][x] + (15/(4*x^2))*y[x] == 0, y[x0] == y0, 
    Derivative[1][y][x0] == y1}, y, {x, x0, x0 + 10}]

p2 = Plot[y[x] /. mysol2, {x, x0, x0 + 10}]

mysol3 = NDSolve[{Derivative[2][y][x] + Sqrt[x]*y[x] == 0, y[x0] == y0, Derivative[1][y][x0] == y1}, y, 
   {x, x0, x0 + 10}]

p3 = Plot[y[x] /. mysol3, {x, x0, x0 + 10}]

Show[{p1, p3}]
 
I'm not sure I follow. I'll keep looking, but I'm somewhat new to Mathematica.
 
Ah, so I am correct, and it is a mistake in the solution (which was actually written by a student) ? I ran it in mathematica, and it appears to be so. I should be able to solve my approximate equation by hand but can't think of how. Any suggestions? Thanks so much for taking time to look at this.
 
I'm not entirely sure about all this but seems to me based on the numerical results that for large x, we can neglect the terms with x in the denominator and we get as a good approximation:

y''+\sqrt{x}y=0

. . . well that ain't easy neither but I think we can solve it manually by making a change of independent variable by letting u=x^{5/4}. I ran through this substitution quick and got it close to the solution reported by Mathematica in terms of Bessel functions. I'm basing this substitution on the results reported by Mathematica for the code:

DSolve[y''[x]+x^(1/n) y[x]==0,y,x]
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K