# Approximating the gamma function near x=-3

1. Aug 3, 2013

### theumbrellaman

I've just started self studying James Nearing's "Mathematical Tools for Physicists" (available at http://www.physics.miami.edu/~nearing/mathmethods/mathematical_methods-three.pdf), and I'm having trouble with problem 1.16 about the gamma function, defined for positive x as $$\Gamma(x)= \int_0^\infty t^{x-1}e^{-t}\,dt.$$

The problem asks
The problem also suggests to make use of the identity $x\Gamma(x)= \Gamma(x+1)$. Earlier in the text he mentions how, since $\Gamma(1)=0!=1$, using the identity above we can make the approximation for x near 0: $\Gamma(x)≈\frac{\Gamma(1)}{x}=\frac{1}{x}$.

I've tried to replicate this technique by approximating $\Gamma(x)$ near -1 as $\Gamma(x)=\frac{\Gamma(x+1)}{x}≈\frac{1/(x+1)}{x}=\frac{1}{x(x+1)}.$ Continuing in this manner leads to $\Gamma(x)≈1/(x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3))$ for x near -3, which doesn't agree with his answer. Thanks in advance for the help!

2. Aug 3, 2013

### Staff: Mentor

You are on the right track, and nearly done:
Close to -3, what is x(x+1)(x+2) approximately?

3. Aug 3, 2013

It agrees !

File size:
6.2 KB
Views:
95
4. Aug 3, 2013

### theumbrellaman

haha wow can't believe I didn't notice that. thanks!

Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook