APS Physics view of pre-inflation cosmology article

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The APS Physics article discusses advancements in pre-inflation cosmology, specifically through the work of Agullo, Ashtekar, and Nelson, published in Physical Review Letters. This research extends conventional inflation analysis back to the pre-inflation era, addressing limitations of classical space-time models. The findings utilize loop quantum gravity techniques to refine the understanding of cosmological perturbations during the Planck era. The article is featured in APS Physics and is accessible for free, along with detailed preprints available on arXiv.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of loop quantum gravity concepts
  • Familiarity with cosmological perturbation theory
  • Knowledge of classical space-time models in physics
  • Awareness of the significance of the Planck era in cosmology
NEXT STEPS
  • Read the featured article on APS Physics: "An Extension of the Quantum Theory of Cosmological Perturbations to the Planck Era"
  • Explore the preprint on arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.1609
  • Investigate the implications of loop quantum gravity on cosmological models
  • Review the January 2013 Scientific American article by Davide Castelvecchi for broader context
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in theoretical physics, cosmologists, and science communicators interested in the latest developments in pre-inflation cosmology and quantum gravity theories.

marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,752
Reaction score
795
"APS Physics" view of pre-inflation cosmology article

The APS has an online periodical that publishes "Viewpoints" on current research, for instance http://physics.aps.org/articles/v5/142
is an interpretive explanatory viewpoint, written for non-specialists,
on the article by Agullo Ashtekar Nelson published last month in Physical Review Letters.

This is on geometry&matter fluctuations in the PRE-INFLATION era. Basically it extends the conventional inflation analysis back further in time, where the conventional analysis is not valid because it is set on a (singular) classical space-time.

There is also a write-up of the Agullo et al work in the January 2013 SciAm
by Davide Castelvecchi.

Here's the PRL article (they made it a "featured article" with free access)
http://physics.aps.org/featured-article-pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.251301
It is also available on arxiv, along with a 50 page paper giving technical detail on which the PRL Letter is based.
short PRL article preprint: http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.1609
50 page article: http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.1354
==quote 1211.1354==
An Extension of the Quantum Theory of Cosmological Perturbations to the Planck Era
Ivan Agullo, Abhay Ashtekar, William Nelson
(Submitted on 6 Nov 2012)
Cosmological perturbations are generally described by quantum fields on (curved but) classical space-times. While this strategy has a large domain of validity, it can not be justified in the quantum gravity era where curvature and matter densities are of Planck scale. Using techniques from loop quantum gravity, the standard theory of cosmological perturbations is extended to overcome this limitation. The new framework sharpens conceptual issues by distinguishing between the true and apparent trans-Planckian difficulties and provides sufficient conditions under which the true difficulties can be overcome within a quantum gravity theory. In a companion paper, this framework is applied to the standard inflationary model, with interesting implications to theory as well as observations.
Comments: 50 pages, no figures. This is first of the two detailed papers on which arXiv 1209.1609 (PRL at press) is based
==endquote==

It's nice to see pre-inflation cosmology becoming increasingly visible in science media.

In case anyone wants, here's the SciAm link:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/a...-einsteins-relativity-universes-first-moments
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
10K