Arbitrary function of a matrix - power-series representation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the expression exp(i*f(A)), where A is a matrix with known real eigenvalues. The original poster is exploring the power-series representation of functions of matrices as a potential approach to this problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the expansion of the exponential function as a power series and consider the implications of A being diagonalizable. There are attempts to express f(A) in terms of its eigenvalues and to manipulate the expression for exp(i*f(A)). Questions arise regarding the nature of the function f and how to handle its arbitrary nature.

Discussion Status

Several participants have contributed ideas on how to approach the problem, particularly through the diagonalization of A and the implications for f(A). There is an ongoing exploration of how to express the exponential of the function in terms of its eigenvalues, but no consensus has been reached on a definitive method.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the specifics of the function f, which affects the ability to proceed with the evaluation. The discussion reflects a mix of assumptions and explorations of generality in the context of matrix functions.

bjnartowt
Messages
265
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



I am trying to evaluate exp(i*f(A)), where A is a matrix whose eigenvalues are known and real.

Homework Equations


You can expand functions of a matrix in a power-series. I think that's the way to get started on this problem. I foresee the exponential of a power-series expansion of f(A) suddenly becoming a product of exponentials of a matrix, which, themselves, are power-series. It sounds ugly, but perhaps some pleasant collapse will happen.

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay, let's try finding power-series expansion of f(A):
f(A) = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{n \to \infty } {\frac{{{f^{(n)}}(0)}}{{n!}}{A^n}} = {\rm{oh dear}}...{\rm{unaware of derivatives of f at 0}}{\rm{.}}

Hmmm...maybe my idea above is not so great.

I think I am thwarted by the arbitrariness of the function "f(A)". Prior experience suggests arbitrariness is nothing to be afraid of...just an opportunity for higher generality...which is neato.

When you, dear reader, peruse this cry for help, do any suggestions come to your mind for a starting point to evaluating exp(i*f(A))? I just can't seem to bring "A" outside of "f" in order to take advantage of the fact that we know its eigenvalues.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
do you know anything about f?

otherwise I would just expand the exponential as
e^{i f(A)} = \sum_{k=0} \frac{(if(A))^k}{k!}
 
Last edited:
not sure this helps but playing with stuff

start by making the assumption A is diagonalisable - is it...? may lead to somthing interesting...

then there exists some S such that
S^{-1}AS = \lambda
where lambda is diagonal, with main entries the eigenvalues of A

then
f(A) <br /> = f(S \lambda S^{-1}) <br /> = \sum_{n = 0} {\frac{f^{(n)}(0)}{n!}{(S \lambda S^{-1})^n}} <br /> = \sum_{n = 0} {\frac{f^{(n)}(0)}{n!}{(S \lambda^n S^{-1})}} <br /> = S \left( \sum_{n = 0} {\frac{f^{(n)}(0)}{n!}{( \lambda^n )}} \right)S^{-1}<br /> = Sf(\lambda)S^{-1}
 
Last edited:
then applying same idea in the exponential
e^{i f(A)} = e^{i Sf(\lambda)S^{-1} }<br /> = \sum_{k=0} \frac{(i S f(\lambda)S^{-1} )^k}{k!}<br /> = S \left( \sum_{k=0} \frac{(if(\lambda))^k}{k!} \right) S^{-1}<br /> = S e^{i f(\lambda)}S^{-1}

and I'm not sure whether that's helpful...
 
Last edited:
then you could also note for a diagonal matrix lambda
f(\lambda) = \begin{pmatrix}<br /> f(\lambda_1) &amp; 0 &amp; ... \\<br /> 0 &amp; f(\lambda_2) &amp; ... \\<br /> ... &amp; ... &amp; ... \end{pmatrix}

which should be apparent from post #3
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K