Arbitrary function of a matrix - power-series representation

bjnartowt
Messages
265
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



I am trying to evaluate exp(i*f(A)), where A is a matrix whose eigenvalues are known and real.

Homework Equations


You can expand functions of a matrix in a power-series. I think that's the way to get started on this problem. I foresee the exponential of a power-series expansion of f(A) suddenly becoming a product of exponentials of a matrix, which, themselves, are power-series. It sounds ugly, but perhaps some pleasant collapse will happen.

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay, let's try finding power-series expansion of f(A):
[tex]f(A) = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{n \to \infty } {\frac{{{f^{(n)}}(0)}}{{n!}}{A^n}} = {\rm{oh dear}}...{\rm{unaware of derivatives of f at 0}}{\rm{.}}[/tex]

Hmmm...maybe my idea above is not so great.

I think I am thwarted by the arbitrariness of the function "f(A)". Prior experience suggests arbitrariness is nothing to be afraid of...just an opportunity for higher generality...which is neato.

When you, dear reader, peruse this cry for help, do any suggestions come to your mind for a starting point to evaluating exp(i*f(A))? I just can't seem to bring "A" outside of "f" in order to take advantage of the fact that we know its eigenvalues.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
do you know anything about f?

otherwise I would just expand the exponential as
[tex]e^{i f(A)} = \sum_{k=0} \frac{(if(A))^k}{k!}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
not sure this helps but playing with stuff

start by making the assumption A is diagonalisable - is it...? may lead to somthing interesting...

then there exists some S such that
[tex]S^{-1}AS = \lambda[/tex]
where lambda is diagonal, with main entries the eigenvalues of A

then
[tex]f(A) <br /> = f(S \lambda S^{-1}) <br /> = \sum_{n = 0} {\frac{f^{(n)}(0)}{n!}{(S \lambda S^{-1})^n}} <br /> = \sum_{n = 0} {\frac{f^{(n)}(0)}{n!}{(S \lambda^n S^{-1})}} <br /> = S \left( \sum_{n = 0} {\frac{f^{(n)}(0)}{n!}{( \lambda^n )}} \right)S^{-1}<br /> = Sf(\lambda)S^{-1}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
then applying same idea in the exponential
[tex]e^{i f(A)} = e^{i Sf(\lambda)S^{-1} }<br /> = \sum_{k=0} \frac{(i S f(\lambda)S^{-1} )^k}{k!}<br /> = S \left( \sum_{k=0} \frac{(if(\lambda))^k}{k!} \right) S^{-1}<br /> = S e^{i f(\lambda)}S^{-1}[/tex]

and I'm not sure whether that's helpful...
 
Last edited:
then you could also note for a diagonal matrix lambda
[tex]f(\lambda) = \begin{pmatrix}<br /> f(\lambda_1) & 0 & ... \\<br /> 0 & f(\lambda_2) & ... \\<br /> ... & ... & ... \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

which should be apparent from post #3
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K