The Correct Arc Length Formula for Finding a Function F(x)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a function F(x) whose arc length L(x) from the point (1,1/2) to (x,F(x)) is given by the expression (1/2)x^2 + (1/4)Ln(x). Participants explore the arc length formula and its implications, addressing potential discrepancies and assumptions involved in the calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines the arc length formula and derives a function f(x) based on it, leading to a potential discrepancy with an extra -(1/2) in the results.
  • Another participant agrees with the initial findings but notes a similar issue with the integration process, suggesting a failure after applying the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (FTC).
  • A different participant raises a concern about the arc length formula yielding a discontinuity at x=1, questioning the validity of the arc length function L(x) at that point.
  • One participant claims they do not encounter the extra -(1/2) and provides their own derivation, which appears consistent with the original function.
  • Another participant points out that subtracting the result of plugging in the lower limit (1) leads to -1/2, indicating a potential issue with the integration limits.
  • A suggestion is made that the initial point might be (1,0) instead of (1,1/2), which could resolve the discrepancies in the arc length calculation.
  • One participant challenges the correctness of the arc length formula used, emphasizing the importance of the initial conditions in the integration process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correctness of the arc length formula and the implications of the initial conditions. There is no consensus on the resolution of the discrepancies, and multiple competing interpretations of the problem remain.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations related to the assumptions about the initial point and the integration limits, which may affect the results. The discussion highlights the dependence on the definitions and the potential for discontinuities in the arc length function.

Townsend
Messages
240
Reaction score
0
Find a function F(x) whose arc length L(x) from (1,1/2) to (x,F(x)), x>1 is (1/2)x^2 + (1/4)Ln(x).

First some short hand notation.

Int[f(x),dx], means the indefinite integral of the function f(x).

Int[f(x),dx,a,b], means the definite integral where a is the lower bound and b is the upper bound.

d/(dx)[f(x)], is the derivate of f(x).

Sqrt[f(x)], is the square root of f(x).

Basically I am trying to follow Mathematica conventions and adding a touch of Leibniz to it.

Ok, now here is what I have done and where I am at thus far.

Arc length formula is Int[Sqrt[1+(d/dt)[f(t)]^2],dt,a,x]

So I have Int[Sqrt[1+((d/dt)[f(t)])^2],dt,1,x] = (1/2)x^2 + (1/4)Ln(x)

So by the FTC I can say that

d/(dx)[(1/2)x^2 + (1/4)Ln(x)] = Sqrt[1+(d/dt)[f(t)]^2]

Which is

x + 1/(4x) = Sqrt[1+(d/dt)[f(t)]^2]

Squaring both sides I have

(x + 1/(4x))^2 = abs[1+(d/dt)[f(t)]^2]

I drop the absolute value here so I have.

(x + 1/(4x))^2 = 1+(d/dt)[f(t)]^2

x^2 + 1/2 + (1/(4x))^2 = 1+(d/dt)[f(t)]^2

Subtracting 1 from both sides and factoring the RHS

(x - 1/(4x))^2 = ((d/dt)[f(t)])^2

Taking square root of both sides and discarding the absolute value I have.

(d/dt)[f(t)] = x - 1/(4x)

Integrating both sides I get.

f(x) =(1/2)x^2 - (1/4)Ln(x) +c

I use the point (1,(1/2)) that is given to find c. Thus c = 0.

Seems ok, right?

Well that means that if I put f(x) back into my arc length formula I should get back to the given function.

Ok... Did that and now I have an extra -(1/2) on my function? What am I missing here? One thing to notice is

Int[Sqrt[1+((d/dt)[f(t)])^2],dt,1,x] = (1/2)x^2 + (1/4)Ln(x)

When x=1 you have 0 = 1/2

Of course the restriction was x>1

Any help would be great, thanks.

cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Interesting. I'm getting the same thing.

You'll notice that the method fails right after applying the FTCs. You get an expression for Sqrt[1+f'[t]^2] that, if you integrate from 1 to x with respect to t, has the extra -1/2. Additionally, maybe I just can't use my calculator, but whenever I asked it to find the arclength numerically between two finite points for x^2/2 + 1/(4x), the answer did not agree with x + Log[x]/4 - 1/2.

Sorry I'm not more help, but mathematical rigor is most definitely not my strong point.

cookiemonster
 
i'm tempted to think there is no solution because if x=1, the arc length formula would give 1/2. the restriction x>1 may be the resolution to that little dilemma. seems odd though that the arc length function L(x) is discontinuous at x=1, jumping from 0 to 1/2. L(1) should be 0.
 
I don't see the problem, I don't get an extra 1/2 at the end. I get the same result as you do finding the function but I don't have any problem inputing back into the equation.

f(x) = x^2 - \frac{ln|x|}{4}

\frac{df(x)}{dx} = x - \frac{1}{4x}

\frac{df(x)}{dx}^2 = x^2 - \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{16x^2}

\frac{df(x)}{dx}^2 + 1 = x^2 + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{16x^2} = (x + \frac{1}{4x})^2

L = \int_{1}^{x} \sqrt(x + \frac{1}{4x})^2 dx = \int_{1}^{x} (x + \frac{1}{4x}) dx

L = [ \frac{x^2}{2} + \frac{ln|x|}{4} ]_{1}^{x}

Like I said, unless I missed something in your post, I don't see any problem.
 
in L = [ \frac{x^2}{2} + \frac{ln|x|}{4} ]_{1}^{x}, when you subtract off the result of plugging in the 1, you get -1/2.
 
Oh, I see. That's odd. Are you sure that in the text they didn't mean that the result from the arclength formula should be x^2/2 + lnx/4 before you put in the limits?
 
or that the initial point might be (1,0)? if it were (1,0), then x^2/2+(logx)/4 would work.

kinda neat, actually. if A(f)(x) gives the arc length of f as a function of x and the initial point was (1,0), then this particular function x^2/2+(logx)/4 is a fixed "point" of the operator A.
 
Your arclength formula is wrong. Starting with the derivative of the arclength, you have:
dL/dx=sqrt(1+f'(x)^(2)).
Integrating from 1 to x yields:
L(x)=L(1)+int^(x)_(1)sqrt(1+f'(t)^(2))dt
When L(1) is non-zero, as in your case, it simply means that the graph (t,f(t)) (on 1<t<x) represents a segment of a curve starting at some point (x0,y0) such that the arclength from (x0,y0) to (1,1/2) is L(1)..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K