Arc length/ surface area with integrals

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the formulas for arc length and surface area in calculus, specifically when revolving functions around axes. The integral for arc length, s = ∫cd√(1 + [g'(y)]²)dy, can be adapted for functions expressed as y = g(x) by substituting g'(y) with dy/dx and adjusting the bounds accordingly. The surface area of a solid of revolution can be calculated using A = 2πr * l, where r is the radius and l is the arc length. The choice of integrating with respect to x or y depends on the axis of revolution and the orientation of the function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus, specifically arc length and surface area formulas.
  • Familiarity with functions and their derivatives, particularly in the context of rotation.
  • Knowledge of the Pythagorean theorem as it applies to calculus.
  • Ability to manipulate integrals and change variables effectively.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the arc length formula for different functions.
  • Learn how to apply the surface area formula for solids of revolution around various axes.
  • Explore the concept of parametric equations and their application in arc length calculations.
  • Investigate the use of Riemann sums in approximating surface area integrals.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians focusing on geometric applications, and anyone involved in advanced mathematics or engineering requiring a solid understanding of integrals and their applications in real-world scenarios.

lLovePhysics
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
I have a question on the formulas for arc length and surface area.

Do you use the formula: s= \int_{c}^{d}\sqrt{1+[g'(y)]^2}dy only when you are provided with a function x=g(y)?? Can you convert that to y=g(x) and solve it by replacing g'(y) with y(x), changing the bounds and the dy to dx?

Like for example if you wanted to solve:
Find the area of the surface formed by revolving the graph of f(x)=x^2 on the interval [0,2] about the y-axis.

How would you know whether to find the surface area with respect to x or y? Are these independent on the axis of revolution? Why does the book give the Surface area formula with respect to x and y?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Before finding the surface area, you will need to find the arc length that is traced out on that interval, and then rotate it (ie, pretend it is a cylinder with radius = f(x)). Then you can probably use the equation A = 2*pi*r*l with some help from the calculus. Perhaps the easiest way to find the correct arc length formula is to make it yourself imagining you have a series of small triangles with lengths dx and df (this can be dy too but this might be easier) (and you can add dz if you're doing it in 3d), with the pythagorian theorem giving you
<br /> ds = \sqrt{dx^{2}+df^{2}}<br />
now, you want to turn this into something that you can integrate. So you know what f(x) is, so you will want to integrate with respect to x. So you pull the dx out:
<br /> ds = \sqrt{1 + (\frac{df}{dx})^{2}}dx<br />
Once you have found this on your interval, you can rotate it. Its been a while since I've done these, but I believe this is a workable method.
 
lLovePhysics said:
I have a question on the formulas for arc length and surface area.

Do you use the formula: s= \int_{c}^{d}\sqrt{1+[g&#039;(y)]^2}dy only when you are provided with a function x=g(y)?? Can you convert that to y=g(x) and solve it by replacing g'(y) with y(x), changing the bounds and the dy to dx?
Yes, you can. In fact, if you have both x and y as functions of some parameter t, say x= f(t), y= g(t) then s= \int \sqrt{f&#039;(t)^2+ g&#039;(t)^2}dt. That reduces your first integral if x= t, y= g(t) and to your second if x= f(t), y= t.

Like for example if you wanted to solve:
Find the area of the surface formed by revolving the graph of f(x)=x^2 on the interval [0,2] about the y-axis.

How would you know whether to find the surface area with respect to x or y? Are these independent on the axis of revolution? Why does the book give the Surface area formula with respect to x and y?
I'm not sure I understand your last question- you don't say what formula you are talking about.

If, for example, you had a straight line x= a, rotated around the y-axis, you would get a circular cylindar of radius a. Its surface area would be the circumference of the circle, 2\pi x= 2 \pi a time the height (measured in the y direction) h. For a curved figure rotated around the y-axis, you would, of course, imagine very thin "layers", each a very short cylinder, stacked on top of one another. In each cylinder, since x does not change MUCH, you can approximate the surface area by 2\pi x dy where "dy" is the height. The total surface area can be approximated by the Riemann sum \Sum (2\pi x dy) and can be made exact by the limit process that gives the integral 2\pi\int x dy. Of course, in the case that x= g(y) that becomes 2\pi\int g(y)dy. If the graph y= f(x) is rotated about the x-axis, that would, of course, just swap x and y ("of course" because you can just swap x and y in the "Riemann sum" argument): 2\pi\int ydx= 2\pi\int f(x)dx.

In both of those, the curve is rotated around the x or y axis. But you can use the same argument for any axis. Suppose you have the curve x= g(y) rotated around an axis x= a rather than the x-axis, x= 0. First you would draw a picture and decide whether the graph is on the left or right of x= a. That's important because the radius of the circle formed has to be positive: r= |x- a| which is either x- a or a- x depending upon whether x is larger than or less than a. (If the graph x= g(y) crosses the line x= a, you will need to do separate integrals for g(y)< a and g(y)> a.) If x> a, then the circle has radius x- a rather than just x and so the circumference is 2\pi (x- a) and the surface area integral becomes
\int 2\pi (x-a) dy= 2\pi \int (g(y)-a)dy.

Again, if you are given y= f(x) rotated around the line y= b, you just swap x and y: 2\pi\int |f(x)- b|dx.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K